] Primary disk pool volume limit
On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
...
When I do a show thread there is a line that is Thread table size. I
am assuming that is a thread limit of some sort. Do you know if
this is
correct?
It would seem to be TSM's personal choice for a table which
On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
...
When I do a show thread there is a line that is Thread table size. I
am assuming that is a thread limit of some sort. Do you know if
this is
correct?
It would seem to be TSM's personal choice for a table which manages
thread information.
On Jan 6, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
How would I determine what the per-process thread limit is? Your
suggestion of a thread limitation seems to fit the known facts.
Andy - Here's some info from my AIX notes...
Threads, maximum number The programming limits are
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 9:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Primary disk pool volume limit
On Jan 6, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
How would I determine what the per-process thread limit
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:38:04 -0600, Andy Huebner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I do not understand the hard to manage argument, I use scripts to do
all of that sort of work. It is nice to be able to fine tune the
disk pool sizes.
I have found that keeping one volume per RAID (lun, perhaps, in
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical
question.
Are 1800 volumes too many? We have been experiencing TCP connection
failures since reaching this number. ...
Andy - You obviously need to look for ANR messages in the TSM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Primary disk pool volume limit
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical
question.
Are 1800 volumes too many? We have been experiencing TCP connection
failures since reaching
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:29:26 -0600, Andy Huebner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical question.
Are 1800 volumes too many?
I would say 'Hell yes!', but not from a technical-constraint
perspective; I'd emphasize the management overhead involved
] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:17 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Primary disk pool volume limit
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:29:26 -0600, Andy Huebner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical
question.
Are 1800
One thing to keep in mind: If you ever have to restore your TSM
database from backup, you will need to audit all of your [random
access] disk storage pool volumes. The more you have, the longer
this will take.
At 12:16 AM 1/5/2006, Andy Huebner wrote:
Is there or what is the practical limit
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Zarnowski
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:37 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Primary disk pool volume limit
One thing to keep in mind: If you ever have to restore your TSM
database
Is there or what is the practical limit on the number of disk pool
volumes and the total size of a disk pool? I am running 5.2.2.4 on AIX
5.1.
Andy Huebner
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an
12 matches
Mail list logo
