Re: TDP for Domino Performance - redux

2002-08-21 Thread David Stabler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/21/02 08:11AM >>> > I would have thought a 3590E1A on a SAN/FC connection would be > fast enough to keep up with this traffic, other than to rewind the tape. Indeed, that may be the issue. It could be going so fast that the tape drive is having to wait on the next round of

Re: TDP for Domino Performance - redux

2002-08-21 Thread Del Hoobler
> Tape change is not the issue. I was watching it for 5-10 minutes and it > was using the same tape. This was the first thing I checked. However, the > "waiting" messages keep appearing every so-many lines in the log. > > I would have thought a 3590E1A on a SAN/FC connection would be fast enough >

Re: TDP for Domino Performance - redux

2002-08-21 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
pond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TDP for Domino Performance - redux > Waiting for TSM server > Full: 3 Read: 152043520 Written: 148897792 Rate: 473.60 Kb/Sec > Full: 3 Read: 152043520 Writt

Re: TDP for Domino Performance - redux

2002-08-20 Thread Del Hoobler
> Waiting for TSM server > Full: 3 Read: 152043520 Written: 148897792 Rate: 473.60 Kb/Sec > Full: 3 Read: 152043520 Written: 148897792 Rate: 472.07 Kb/Sec > Full: 3 Read: 152043520 Written: 148897792 Rate: 470.54 Kb/Sec > Full: 3 Read: 152043520 Written: 148897792 Rate: 469.02

TDP for Domino Performance - redux

2002-08-20 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Got a user doing TDP for Domino backups... The following is a snippet from her DOMISCH.LOG Full: 3 Read: 149946368 Written: 146800640 Rate: 482.65 Kb/Sec Full: 3 Read: 150994944 Written: 147849216 Rate: 484.47 Kb/Sec Full: 3 Read: 150994944 Written: 147849216 Rate: 4