Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-02-15 Thread Julius Martinez
e Group, Tivoli Storage (520) 799-5472 (tie line 321-5472) Tucson, Arizona - Message from Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:51:16 +0100 ----- Subject: Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center Orville, Alas the PDF's are gone. What's left is a bloody CD, whic

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-02-11 Thread Richard van Denzel
t it (I've installed the CD). Richard. Orville Lantto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 10-02-2005 19:28 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject: Re: TSM 5.3 Admi

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-02-10 Thread Orville Lantto
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Paul Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 02/10/2005 12:36 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: TSM

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-02-09 Thread Paul Fielding
ot;Kathy Mitton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:19 PM Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3 Administration Center We?ve noticed the recent discussion and concern in this forum surrounding the new TSM 5.3 Administration Center. We are listening to you, and we would like

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-28 Thread Kauffman, Tom
Much appreciated commentary, Mark. I've stayed out of this so far, for the most part -- I'm still waiting for the 5.3 install media to show up. But, based on all the other commentary, and past experience with java in the ESS and SAN switches, I have a question for those who have managed to get th

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread Andrew Raibeck
One question I can address: > >4. Since the Administration Center is accessed via a browser, it is > >accessible from > >any operating system, including XP. Relative to installing the > >Administration Center itself on XP, since XP tends to be a workstation OS > >rather than a server OS, we aren'

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
concern in this forum surrounding the new TSM 5.3 Administration Center. We are listening to you, and we would like to respond to several of the points raised. Thank You for recognizing the problem and taking the time to talk with us. First, we would like to explain why we made these changes. The old

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread TSM_User
Kathy Mitton OM> cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: TSM 5.3 Administration Center Dist Stor Manager" .EDU> 27-01-2005 00:49 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" We?ve noticed the recent discussion and concern in this forum surrounding the new TSM 5.3 Administration Cent

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread Richard van Denzel
EDU OM> cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: TSM 5.3 Administration Center Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU>

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread asr
==> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:49:47 -0700, Kathy Mitton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > We understand that it is hard to give up an interface you know well and > switch to a new one. To help you with this transition, we developed > several Flash tutorials which are available from within the Administrati

Re: AW: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread Rainer Tammer
Hello, Thomas Rupp wrote: Hi Kathy! Another remark from a customer with TSM as the onyl Tivoli application to manage. I'm a bit disappointed that Tivoli drops support for the web interface as soon as it starts with the new Administration Interface. Why couldn't tivoli overlap support for both inter

AW: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread Thomas Rupp
Hi Kathy! Another remark from a customer with TSM as the onyl Tivoli application to manage. I'm a bit disappointed that Tivoli drops support for the web interface as soon as it starts with the new Administration Interface. Why couldn't tivoli overlap support for both interfaces for lets say 1 Vers

Re: TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-27 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Kathy! Please let me reflect on your post: > They not only participated in defining what they were looking > for but also participated in early design reviews. I know, as a matter of fact I was invited by IBM, but my boss didn't allow me to go at that time... I would have definitely advised IBM

TSM 5.3 Administration Center

2005-01-26 Thread Kathy Mitton
We?ve noticed the recent discussion and concern in this forum surrounding the new TSM 5.3 Administration Center. We are listening to you, and we would like to respond to several of the points raised. First, we would like to explain why we made these changes. The old interface had not been