Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-04-02 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have two objections to backupsets. The first is that API > data is not covered. The second is that you are not supposed > to make new backups for a node whilst the backupset is being > created - this could cause horrendous scheduling difficulti

Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-04-01 Thread Steve Harris
Mark, I have two objections to backupsets. The first is that API data is not covered. The second is that you are not supposed to make new backups for a node whilst the backupset is being created - this could cause horrendous scheduling difficulties in my environment. Is this second restricti

Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-04-01 Thread Steven Pemberton
> >As big a fan of backupsets as I am, I feel the need to point out the > >disadvantage of backupsets: you can't browse through them if you don't > >the name of a desired file or its directory location. You can run Q > >BACKUPSETCONTENTS, but then you'll have to grep through a *very* long > >output

Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-04-01 Thread J M
>On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:16 pm, it was written: >>You could try running monthly incrementals under a >>different nodename (ie: create another dsm.opt file >>eg: dsmmthly.opt) to your TSM (same or even dedicated) >>server. BTW, running monthly incrementals will not facilitate your long-term storage n

Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-03-31 Thread Stapleton, Mark
>On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:16 pm, it was written: >>You could try running monthly incrementals under a >>different nodename (ie: create another dsm.opt file >>eg: dsmmthly.opt) to your TSM (same or even dedicated) >>server. BTW, running monthly incrementals will not facilitate your long-term stora

Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-03-31 Thread Steven Pemberton
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:16 pm, you wrote: > You could try running monthly incrementals under a different nodename (ie: > create another dsm.opt file eg: dsmmthly.opt) to your TSM (same or even > dedicated) server. Have you considered creating a monthly BackupSet tape for each of your file servers?

Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-03-31 Thread Shamim, Rizwan (IDS EMEA)
nal Message- > From: J M [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 1:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: archive failure (continued) > > Hey TSMers- > > We have archive jobs that repeatedly fail or run for long periods of time > on > o

Re: archive failure (continued)

2003-03-30 Thread J M
Hey TSMers- We have archive jobs that repeatedly fail or run for long periods of time on our large file servers (200 GB, NT, TSM 4.2 Client, TSM 4.2 Server). The jobs will not run in parallel with daily backups- so we are looking for a better solution- We are considering moving from 100 Mb to Giga