he same policy domain. Could you be more
> specific?
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Don France
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:16 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Don France
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:16 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] backup destination change possible?
You could use management class within the same PD; the same
way you'd use a different MC for incrementals or dif
It's not a policy domain definition but a Management Class Definition.
You could use different Management Class for your nodes.
I think you have to define : "stg_diskpoool_exchange" with next stg
"stg_tape_exchange"
MC_EXCH_DISK=>direct to stg_diskpoool_exchange
MC_EXCH_TAPE => direct to stg_t
You could use management class within the same PD; the same
way you'd use a different MC for incrementals or differentials (ie,
the logs), just add the appropriate INCLUDE statement in their opt file.
Also, consider sending the disk_mc data to a storage pool that migrates
to the same tapepool as
Hi everyone,
Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.
I have 4 TDP Exchange client nodes needs that are currently
backing up directly to tape. Our data outgrew our disk pool so we had to
point these directly to tape. Someone in our team wants to split these
up so 2 nodes will backup di
