Platform for CPU2TSM:
http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Grant Street [mailto:gra...@al.com.au]
Skickat: den 12 juni 2012 03:25
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: Stopping NDMP backup storage pool
we have a NDMP backup storage pool running and
we have a NDMP backup storage pool running and it is "Waiting for mount
of scratch volume (345071 seconds)."
We have some tapes that are in the library but the checkin process is
waiting even though I used checkl=barcode.
How do I get it to die/recover?
This is the library
: backup storage pool slow - find offending file
We back all of our nightly data up to an SL 500 LTO4 tape library and then
during the day, that cloud of data is also copied to another SL500 LTO4 tape
library at a remote location. The backup storage pool is taking a significantly
long time to run and
We back all of our nightly data up to an SL 500 LTO4 tape library and then
during the day, that cloud of data is also copied to another SL500 LTO4 tape
library at a remote location. The backup storage pool is taking a significantly
long time to run and appears to be running for a long time
y log. I've checked and it doesn't seem to
> be the same tapes each time. Unfortunately this seems to happen several
> times, and often in the middle of the night.
> Is there any way to diagnose why the backup storage pool process is
> stopping/hanging at 1 file? I don'
seems to happen several times, and often in the middle of the night.
Is there any way to diagnose why the backup storage pool process is
stopping/hanging at 1 file? I don't see any errors anywhere, either in the
activity log or in the tape library. If it at all possible,is there a way t
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:50:25 -0500, Andrew Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Is this really a good answer? I know it's "working as designed", as
> IBM is sometimes fond of saying. TSM knows whats on what tapes. It
> seems like, unless the processing required to do it would be
> substantial
Is this really a good answer? I know it's "working as designed", as IBM is
sometimes fond of saying. TSM knows whats on what tapes. It seems like,
unless the processing required to do it would be substantial, TSM could
split the processes so this doesn't occur, at least as often. With
non-coll
Charles - See IBM Technote 1208545.
Hello:
I have two "backup stgpools" running and one of them is waiting for the
tape being used by the other. I have seen this error before and it will
resolve itself eventually when the first one finishes, and the second
one gets the tape it is waiting for. But it does cause a delay. I
thought
Hello
Has anyone seen the likes of the following errors on backup storage pool
processing via virtual volumes?
04/12/2006 05:39:15 ANRD bfcputil.c(655): ThreadId<40> Error
testing
whether bitfile must be backed up. Callchain:
10
nager" wrote on 11/18/2005
04:15:52 AM:
> Hi,
>
> The 'Preview' figures do not correspond with the 'real' figures for
Backup
> Storage Pool
>
> Preview says : 114,162 items and a total of 539,509,750,755 bytes
> Real figures are : 132,398 items and a
Hi,
The 'Preview' figures do not correspond with the 'real' figures for Backup
Storage Pool
Preview says : 114,162 items and a total of 539,509,750,755 bytes
Real figures are : 132,398 items and a total of 607,194,421,718 bytes
Anybody knows an explanation for this ?
See
R1212I Backup process 27020 ended for
storage pool
TAPE
_WINDOWS. (SESSION: 462562, PROCESS: 27020)
06/03/05 07:09:50 ANR0986I Process 27020 for BACKUP STORAGE POOL
running in
the BACKGROUND processed 29312 items for
age pool
TAPE
_WINDOWS. (SESSION: 462562, PROCESS: 27020)
06/03/05 07:09:50 ANR0986I Process 27020 for BACKUP STORAGE POOL
running in
the BACKGROUND processed 29312 items for a total of
14,
130,844,016 bytes with a completion state
: backup storage pool job
Hello everyone!
I was wondering if it is possible to create a script with the following 2
commands:
SCRIPT: BA_STG_DEC
ba stg dec dec-copy wait=yes
ba stg dec-tape dec-copy
Is it possible to use the wait=yes parameter? It states that you cannot use
it from a server
Hello everyone!
I was wondering if it is possible to create a script with the following 2
commands:
SCRIPT: BA_STG_DEC
ba stg dec dec-copy wait=yes
ba stg dec-tape dec-copy
Is it possible to use the wait=yes parameter? It states that you cannot
use it from a server console and I wanted to make
When I look at this output:
tsm: TSMPC1>q pr
Process Process Description Status
Number
-
209 Backup Storage Pool Primary Pool RMT_PRIM_LO, Copy
P
=> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:21:05 -0400, Bill Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> when I am running the backup of my primary disc storage pool to tape, I use a
> max process of 4. I make sure that there are plenty of scratch tapes available
> and that the max scratch value for the copy pool is l
I have a situation that is puzzling me and maybe some one here can enlighten me as to
why it is happening
I am running AIX 4.3.3 TSM 5.1.6.5 with a 3494 library with 4 3590B extended
drives(soon to be replaced with E)
when I am running the backup of my primary disc storage pool to tape, I us
in and HOLD back any "You Should Upgrade
> Your
> Hardware" comments since I am looking for an interim solution till I
> can
> make that purchase.
>
>
>
> If I run a backup storage pool (Disk Pool to Tape Pool) on a storage
> pool
> that contains (roughly) 200
...
> If I run a backup storage pool (Disk Pool to Tape Pool) on a storage pool that
> contains (roughly) 200 GB of backup data that TSM will only allocate 1 process
> per NODE no matter how much data is in the DISK pool to be backed up (up to
> the amount of processes specified b
readings that there is no way around this "feature" (shy of
splitting the
nodes data up). Please refrain and HOLD back any "You Should Upgrade
Your
Hardware" comments since I am looking for an interim solution till I
can
make that purchase.
If I run a backup storage pool (D
an interim solution till I can
make that purchase.
If I run a backup storage pool (Disk Pool to Tape Pool) on a storage pool
that contains (roughly) 200 GB of backup data that TSM will only allocate 1
process per NODE no matter how much data is in the DISK pool to be backed up
(up to the am
www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax: (240)539-7175
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Seay, Paul
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: backup storge pool
Yes, you can cancel the backup storage pool command
ent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/01/2001 02:30 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:How to limit drives used to backup storage pool
I have TSM 4.2 on MVS with 4 assig
I have TSM 4.2 on MVS with 4 assigned 9840 tape drives. Is there a way to limit the
number of
tape drives used by a copy storage pool process? I'm using backup storage pool from my
large
primary pool to a backup pool. The number specified by MAXPRocess is 1, but it doesn't
seem to
re
>I have these 2 tapes which TSM have been
>trying to do a copy of the primary tapes, but the primary tape has been
>brought to an off-site location.
Gene - First off, a TSM rule is that only Copy Storage Pool tapes should
go offsite, not Primary tapes.
I presume you don't have Copy Storage
Hi,
Was wondering if anyone could tell me what I should be doing if I
would like to cancel a backup storage of the below-mentioned tapes (backup
stg dailypool dailycopypool). I have these 2 tapes which TSM have been
trying to do a copy of the primary tapes, but the primary tape has been
b
Hi,
Was wondering if anyone could tell me what I should be doing if I
would like to cancel a backup storage of the below-mentioned tapes (backup
stg dailypool dailycopypool). I have these 2 tapes which TSM have been
trying to do a copy of the primary tapes, but the primary tape has been
b
30 matches
Mail list logo
