=servername -id=opid -passsword=pwd mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Nick
Laflamme
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] MOVE DRM & CHECKIN LIBVOL
It's fairly well documented that MOVE DRMEDIA will execute CHECKOUT LIBVOLUME
under the cover
It's fairly well documented that MOVE DRMEDIA will execute CHECKOUT LIBVOLUME
under the covers to make "safe" any copypool volumes and DB backup volumes that
are allegedly on their way off-site.
Is it documented anywhere if MOVE DRM will execute CHECKIN LIBVOL commands?
At
Greetings.
We'd like to have an operator do all the moving-tapes-in-and-out stuff.
The Operator privileges are almost sufficient, except for the
CHECKIN LIBVOL command :-(
For that, we seem to need Storage privilege; but that's far too
much for safety. How can we grant our operator th
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: checkin libvol
Hello All!
I know this will seem like a very unintelligent question, but I am in a
rush and I'm a little confused. I'm trying to checkin a library volume
into the TSM server for NDMP backup use. Currently we use ACSLS and
Gresham, but G
ups. What I am
wondering is: Is this the correct syntax for checking in library volume
T00999 into library naslib?
checkin libvol naslib T00999 status=scratch checklabel=yes
Thanks in advance!
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603
Fax:(717)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Checkin libvol
Food for thought (or at least what I have noticed on a 3584) when TSM
mounts
a tape, the libvolume still has the home element id of the slot it came
out
of. Therefore when TSM checks in tapes it will cannot us
e Services
Aquila Networks Services Ltd
> -Original Message-
> From: Otto Schakenbos [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 October 2003 08:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
>
> If that happens (having a tape in slot where another tapes belongs
If that happens (having a tape in slot where another tapes belongs then
tsm will take the drive offline and you will have take the tape out of
the drive by hand. This is probarly not what you want. You could do a q
mount, get a list of the mounted tape and with a query libv see in which
slots these
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:35:43AM -0500, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
> From: Christian Svensson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Search=yes is not picking up the media from the Service port.
> I need to use Search=bulk.
> And and it??s still does??nt work.<
>
> If you're loading tapes into the I/O station,
volumes that are in insert status.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
The PERL script was more portable than an shell script. We do TSM
implementations on both Unix a
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Wilcox, Andy
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
Hiya Ted,
Just out of complete curiosity, why would you want to run such a script from
somewhere other than on the server itself??? We do
Hi Everyone!
Thanks for everyones feedback.
So if I understand everyone right. You can not checkin tapes via our I/O port without
to run reply
So the only way in my case is to write a batch file who does everything for me.
dsmadmc checkin libvol ltolib search=b checkl=yes
dsmadmc q request >
why would you want to run such a script from
somewhere other than on the server itself???
Hi Andy,
Usually the checkin script does run on the server. In some instances, we
also have a set of administrative scripts and programs running from another
system, and we group all of those together to mak
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Byrne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 October 2003 13:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
>
> > >Hi everyone!
> > >Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q
> > request
>Hi everyone!
>Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q
request and reply
>Is it possible to checkin tape without to run a reply ?
Checking in the tapes through an I/O station (search=bulk) does require
that a reply be issued to a request. However, for many of our custome
5.410.8326 (c)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Svensson
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: Checkin libvol
Hi Otto!
Search=yes is not picking up the media from the Service port.
I n
From: Christian Svensson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Search=yes is not picking up the media from the Service port.
I need to use Search=bulk.
And and it´s still does´nt work.<
If you're loading tapes into the I/O station, you'll have to run the request/reply
process to check them. The search=yes
PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: Checkin libvol
we do for our 7337 (you should use your own libname ofcourse)
checkin libv 7337 search=yes checkl=yes stat=scr
and sit back
Christian Svensson wrote:
>Hi everyone!
>Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q request and reply
&g
we do for our 7337 (you should use your own libname ofcourse)
checkin libv 7337 search=yes checkl=yes stat=scr
and sit back
Christian Svensson wrote:
Hi everyone!
Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q request and reply
Is it possible to checkin tape without to run a
Hi everyone!
Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q request and reply
Is it possible to checkin tape without to run a reply ?
TSM Server : 5.1.7.1
OS : Windows 2000 (SP 3)
Library : Qualstar TLS-8222, Barcode Reader, Service port.
Server HW : Dell PowerEdge 2650
Bes
Checkin libvol
was, traditionally, a single-threaded component -- regardless of how many
processes you started; this will probably not be changed, since most
customers use a single library per TSM server (and the libvol must be
serialized during the checkin process).
BTW, checkin will fail if
I just upgraded my test server to TSM 5.1.1. I can't say I ever noticed this
on the V4 server so I don't know if this is the same or different. I checked
in 9 scratch volumes separately so I could watch all 9 processes finish. The
first 6 I purposefully use checkl=yes to force mounts on drives to
PROTECTED]
Subject: Checkin libvol V5.1.1 server
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
07/16/2002 01:07
PM
I have not seen this, but I would assume TSM process in the order which
the command was received.
Sung Y. Lee
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what you're saying is if I start 2 processes to copy 2 disk pools to
separate tapes and both take a separate tape drive the smaller pool that was
started sec
Has anyone tried this?
the vollist=000780 sems to be ignored...
I WAS goin to label an check-in both volumes, but due to previous errors
on these, the plan was to retry one volume at at time.
The HP-library is a Surestore 20/700, scsi-attached.
Server is AIX, 4.2.1.7
11/26/2001 20:33:27 ANR2
The help says, use vollist only with search=yes.
Miles
--
Miles Purdy
System Manager
Farm Income Programs Directorate
Winnipeg, MB, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (204) 984-1602 fax: (204) 983-7557
"If y
26 matches
Mail list logo
