What does JMX do?
Thanks,
Shawn Wildermuth
http://adoguy.com
C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kunle Odutola
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 1:57 AM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVEL
Hi,
What, in the .NET space, serves the same function as JMX does in Java space?
Kunle
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
I am amazed that noone has had a thought on the business problem here.
In a perfect world everyone would always use ranged comparisons but
unfortunately we do not live in a perfect world and there is a ton of code
out there that already relies (albeit misguidedly) on operations from
1.xfloating
just to be clear ...
As a note for the people I am sure will say, "don't do this .. use a
precision range or round instead". These are simply examples ... I am fine
with using these solutions (in fact I normally use range checks). The
problem is that code like this crops up regularly and it creat
I agree that epsilons should be used .. I stated this in my post but I
somehow that was missed ...
This does not only apply to == .. it applies to <> as well.
If you prefer as an example ...
float f = 97.09f * 100f;
bool test = f > 97.09f * 99.99f;
Console.WriteLine(test);
My point is t
> The root of this specific problem is breaking the commandments of
> floating-point:
To complement this, I like this article:
"What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point
Arithmetic":
http://docs.sun.com/source/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html
While we're posting links...
Hello,
> The root of this specific problem is breaking the commandments of
> floating-point:
To complement this, I like this article:
"What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point
Arithmetic":
http://docs.sun.com/source/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html
Miguel
==
Lately I have been playing a bit with FP in C# (esp with the new clr float
widenning).
I have put some thoughts for changes to the C# compiler here
http://geekswithblogs.net/gyoung/archive/2006/06/05/80747.aspx and would
like to hear other's thought either for or against those possible changes.
I usually try to avoid cross posting but I thought this was fairly relevant
to advanceddotnet & dotnet-clr
Lately I have been playing a bit with FP in C# (esp with the new clr float
widenning).
I have put some thoughts for changes to the C# compiler here
http://geekswithblogs.net/gyoung/archive/
Thanks Zac, so in short, you're saying that if I pick up my .NET compiled DAL
dlls I can move them over to my Ubuntu installation,
and code some mono code utilizing them without a problem? That would indeed be
great.
Frans
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 10:18 +0200, Frans Bouma wrote:
> > the
I think the post got away from you there. :-)
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 07:30 +, Paul Cowan wrote:
> Just what happened to my original post??
>
> Not once did I mention mono
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:27:54 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> > [AD
Here is a good example.. a little tiny http server i wrote for Windows
users on MS.NET but I didn't have a copy of windows installed at home. I
wrote it and compiled it on Linux using mono but it runs prefectly fine
for the users that used it on Win32:
http://www.polystimulus.com/newshout.zip
(Li
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 10:18 +0200, Frans Bouma wrote:
> the thing is: is Mono 'another platform' or is Mono .NET which runs on
> Linux (and other platforms)? This is significant. If
> it's the latter, you could just develop on .NET, and run the binary on
> Mono. If it's the former, it will take tim
> You're right for yourself, and they're right for themselves.
> Let's stop here.
heh, fine by me Stoyan :)
FB, who will see if he can have Dapper + mono run some
generated .NET 2.0 code today
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® htt
Frans,
You're right for yourself, and they're right for themselves. Let's stop here.
Thanks,
Stoyan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
> A lot of people attacking Mono it seems. It's just silly.
I don't think it was attacking, I think it was being realistic.
> Some argue here that you really shouldn't use mono because of
> the massive investments some are spending on Java in the Linux realm.
> However, throwing money at
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 22:54 -0500, Zac Bowling wrote:
> For
> all the same reasons people are choosing .NET on Windows over Java,
> people are choosing Mono on Linux, FreeBSD, MacOSX, HPUX, OpenBSD,
> NetBSD, (and even Windows where people want a native 64 bit version of
> 1.1) over Java.
I forgot
Just what happened to my original post??
Not once did I mention mono
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:27:54 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Cool open source> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM>
> > > -Original Message-> > From: Disc
18 matches
Mail list logo
