Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Serviced Component, distributed transaction s and Custom Exceptions

With control comes responsibility however. Using setcomplete/setabort, you can catch and handle you custom exceptions and do transaction rollback on all other errors with ease. JC Oberholzer Visit us at www.sdt.co.za -Original Message- From: Bill Bassler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Regarding .Net Remoting Proxy

issue, might differ from your scenario. JC Oberholzer Visit us at www.sdt.co.za -Original Message- From: Prasad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 10:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Regarding .Net Remoting Proxy Hello all, I have a

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] COM+ Memory Leak

around with multiple different scenarios etc., but still get exactly the same results. I’ve been hoping to sort this out, but are nearing the project deadline and I am URGENTLY looking for answers Regards JC Oberholzer JC Oberholzer SDT Financial Software Solutions (Pty) Ltd Phone +27(0)12

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Unanswered - Mail Merging within an applica tion - best approach?

tc, (which comes standard with MS Word), in XSL Julian - Don't know Hot Docs, but will check it out. Got a link to a site somewhere? JC Oberholzer -Original Message- From: Joshua Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Unanswered - Mail Merging within an applica tion - best approach?

e points with there marketing dept Alternatively: Inside MS Word, (in word 2002, not earlier) you have events which fire before, during and after mailmerging, and with the macros in Word you can do quite a lot. We have a current solution which uses this. HTH JC Oberholzer www.sdt.co.za

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaini ng a connection from t he pool.

anges to the COM+ setup however, and should be ready for testing again later today. Will keep you posted if we find the issue JC Oberholzer -Original Message- From: Heath Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADV

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaini ng a connection from t he pool.

s/application after about 2000 queries. Any ideas? JC Oberholzer The views expressed in this e-mail are, unless otherwise stated, those of the author and not of SDT or its management. The information is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. All reasonable steps are tak

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] COM+ Context Question

Stoyan Thx for your reply. I'll try it, but can you shed some more light on why this will make a difference? JC Oberholzer -Original Message- From: Stoyan Damov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 August 2003 04:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess the answer is in your que

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] COM+ Context Question

texts? Thanks JC Oberholzer === This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in: 2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet Guerrilla ASP.NET, 13 Oct 2003, in Boston

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting on the new Framework

blisherSVR.soap"; /> ------- Thx JC Oberholzer -Original Message- From: Chris Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 July 2003 12:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you provide a simplified version of your app + .config files? Setting impersonate=true is okay unless you want an

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting on the new Framework

ebRequest.GetRequestStream and then HttpWebRequest.CheckFinalStatus. So, it gets a connection to IIS, but some security setting hijacks it? MSDN is of little help, so to all the Gurus: Please help Thx JC Oberholzer

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Process Isolation in ASP.NET : sample imple mentation

s2.UserID = 2 'If running in the same appdomain, S1.userid will always be equal to S2.userid: now it aint lint = s1.UserID lint = s2.UserID --- Comments appreciated JC Oberholzer |-Original Message- |From: Ravi Pazhani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Process Isolation in ASP.NET

appdomains, but my solutions are not very ellegant, adn I reckon I can surely not be the only guy to have run into this issue. ? Is there any way to just "configure" my way out of this? (would be the first prize), or any other relatively easy way to get around this issue? Thx JC

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Name of MenuItem through Reflection

bles on the form (to compare it to the Sender object in the click event) Thanks JC Oberholzer You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Hosting COM+ component in IIS

identify why I cannot use IIS to host components with ActivationOption.Server. Microsoft’s samples are no help at all, MSDN articles on this are very scarce and uses ActivationOption.Library, but does not care to explain why. Thanks JC Oberholzer You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET a