e part which makes you post on a .NET Mailing list with prolems that
are related purely to your choice of NOT using .NET.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®
Ryan, no clue what you talk about.
Frans referred to the ASP.NET intrinsic output cache that - to my
knowledge - works together with the IIS 6 output caching mechanism.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original
a lock - it will modify the object, and boom.
Which means, in short, that you should not expose the object through
remoting, but a wrapper that makes sure that the necessary locks are
obeyed.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
=
We need more infor for this.
Can you publicsh the relevant method signatures?
I can confirm that the object SHOULD not be serialized - that is, unelss
you reference the object anywhere in the event parameters, naturally.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/
Sure.
Our EntityBeroker and EVERY O/R-Mapper that is not total bullshit do
habve their own query subsystems, you know :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of adv
.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Softare & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> SUBSCRIBE DOTNET-CLR Girikrishna Tirumala
> Sent: Mont
But it DOES cut down the LOC count you have to manually
handle.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O
text from the word
document?
Thomas Tomiczek
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ushanta Mooloo
> Sent: Dienstag, 28. September 2004 14:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [
s when say you have no clue
how to extract them to upload them to the database?
Lots of questions, and basically I do not see enough information to
answer your original question, thanks to basically none (in number:
zero) information you give.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(
What good would this be, given that methods are not evaluated by the
XmlSerializer?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL
o you everyone was taklking of the current 1.1 version of the .net
framework. Which - is something we all would love to be pushed out
further by Microsoft and which is NOT beta software.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stevens
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 10:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Large solutions and references
>
> so based on a working mont
mment with a response.
The nice think is that you do not have to dignify this. This is a fact.
The US, according to it's own criteria, is a terrorist state. Nd I mean this list that
president bush has published once.
Thomas
>
>
> Andrew Baudouin
> Applications Programmer
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
> Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 17:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and
> SQL Server
>
> > So what?
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Baudouin, Andrew
> Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 17:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and
> SQL Server
>
> Right,
nough so that we don't need to automatically assume he can't
> tell a bit from a byte.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Tomiczek
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 5:05
--
>
> |--Clustered Index
> Scan(OBJECT:(..[dbo].[InventoryState].[PK_InventoryState]))
>
> (1 row(s) affected)
>
> StmtText
> ---
>
>
> SET STATISTICS PROFILE OFF
>
> (1 row(s)
ion
to the end user, where this may be still wrong).
As you said, Latin1_General_CI_AS seems to be about the best you can get
your hands on. Be happy you have not to present anything to the user at
the same time.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO
such an attitude, but I think I will rather skip the
> enumeration given that this is a public forum.
>
> -cv
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Tomiczek
> Sent: Mo
I would say he means the windows scheduler. This is apart of the
operating system, you know.
http://www.iopus.com/guides/winscheduler.htm for a beginner intro into
this part of Windows XP.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes
rder in your query? This
is pretty simple, and you do not have to resort on the client then. It
just is not automatic.
Note: SQL is SET ORIENTED. Sets do not have an intrinsic sort order.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
>
You need to return a HTML page that then has a request string in an IMG
element.
This way you force this to be opened in the browser.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated dis
ed" as described in
> the knowledgeable.
This solves keepalives. It does NOT solve the "10 requests concurrent"
issue. In any real stress test you WILL hit this.
> Is there any way to get a decent stress test going?
No per definition. Use a server.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Softw
Well, this is your error then, isn't it?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Puneet Jain
Can it rech the asp.net .js file? Or dies it get an error doing so
(especially an access denied error?)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Srihari Angaluri
> Sent: Samstag, 22. Mai 2004
Taken
But in this particular case, being heavy matrix opreations in 3d, this
kills your performance.
Purity is nice, but here we talk of criticals, too.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
optimizations (that are also not really wanted).
Has anyone a clue whether there may be a reason they are not defined as ref?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [
It is a value type.
But I think MS assumes that the function calls will be inlined anyway,
and the no copy ends up on the stack.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated dis
Copy, unless the parameter is passed by reference.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.nET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arlie
Isn't there a WMI integration where you can see the queue and it's
parameters?
Should be.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topic
gt; and windows-based application.
>
> Thomas Tomiczek wrote:
>
> >>This would speed things a lot, especially for enterprise
> development.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Possibly.
> >
> >But only if you like extremely idiotic surfaces.
> >
> >
the worst of both worlds. Just will not work.
Wishfull thinking.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Hmpf.
::I assume that this works since the enum value is boxed and unboxed to
an int.
Wrong. It works because enums CAN be cast to their primitive type.
Boxing never enters the equation here.
What you ask for is legal - by design.
Reference: Language specification.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA
for :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Marek Malowidzki
> Sent: Sonntag, 21. März 2004
Hm, but this would totally take out the integral sort, right?
I mean, the IBindingList sort mechanisms have no provisions for multi column sort (at
least none I am aware of).
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
> -Original
There is no cleaner or different way for one simple reason:
Compatibility with ActiveX components.
They require STA and they limit the whole thing to this type of message
pump.
Now, dropping them is not an option, too. A lot depends on this model.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consul
INVOKE the message call back onto the STA thread :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dave Foderick
> Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2004 02:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Call STA
forget
that you work in .NET - you have a TON of nice methods of making sure
that the busienss logic is correct, distributed, up to the corerct
version etc. In case of what we build into the EntityBroker, the Data
Access Layer (or: ObjectServer) can serve you a list of DLL's that need
t
Don't books have a UPC (Universal Product Code), too?
This would be a little more detailed than an ISDN.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[E
must do
something with the data on the transfer.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dotnetminer
Sent: Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2003 06:3
ow me to say
Int I = Enumname.ToGenericInt(enumvalue)
:-) Just in case someone at MS reads this. Right now I have to put all
these little methods into external utility methods.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated disc
Look at how ASP.NET works.
ASP.NET also has only a limited number of threads, and still it manages
to handl way more connnected clients.
The same principles apply with remoting.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET
> -Original Message-
go it, his arguments are more
than valid.
But I would say: fix the infrastructure, isntead of working around the
symptoms.
We do it because we need it for our business object infrastructure and
O/R mapper - basically providing this as a service.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consuling Ltd.
(
code for us.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damien Guard
> Sent: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 12:36
> To: [EMAIL
do already have. This makes
the object rooted again :-) Works like a charm. You "unique" the object
when thre is a cached instance. And this the weak reference tells you.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consuting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can not know. The GC does not know either, until it runs. Rooting
information is not tracked during program execution.
What do you try to achieve?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated
s:
* News sites
* Online shops (catalog part)
* Search engines
Etc.
Don't assume he does not care about scalability JUST becase he optimises
one computer scenarios.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
The obvious was much niver (and we talk of winforms here).
The "obvious" was this:
The inner control existed TWO TIMES, and another instance was sitting on
top. Someone happily had ungled the code. The reason I did not see
anything was that I saw the empty one.
Thomas
>
> -Original Messag
Anyone has an idea for this?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
Does not totally fit it. Still, here is our scenario:
* We have one outer class, derived from an abstract base class. NO
commin interface etc. with the contained stuff.
* The outer class contains a ton of stubs.
* For every stub there is a separate class that contains a derived
class.
* There a
plication, if anyone from MS asks (there is
nothing in there besides autogenearated code anyway, and it is trivial).
This is really disturbing.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
- according to normal
inheritance rules, the marker interface would also be visible on the baseclasses.
A STATIC method (which I could find) could work, too, though, now that I think of it.
I could just reflect on whether the static method is available.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd
everywhere starting from As down and this information
is not accessible anymore?
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
Documentation for this anywhere?
Especially on HOW they stop the boxing to happen.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeroen Frijters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Montag, 16. Juni 2003 11:39
> To: [EMA
gIterator iterator;
Object retval = (System.Object) iterator;
> return iterator;
If this also blows - no clue.
BTW - using .NET 1.0 or 1.1?
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bog
Well, no clue about speed, BUT memory wise:
The DataSet (above an XML document) is built on top o fan
XmlDataDocument DOM like presentation, so it uses more memory than the
DOM presentation.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
>
> -Original M
create the XML document manually
(b) use the ObjectXPathNavigator from MS and an XSLT transformation to
put the object down as XML
Bt I do hope you get it working.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
Well, the core thing is: you are using a debugging interface and will run into serious
RIGHTS issues. Nothing I would ever accept in normal software. And, a is a kille - I
need to be able to attach a REAL profiler :-)
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET
to be acceptable.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Schmied Fabian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Montag, 24. März 2003 13:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Adding a custom
Not possible to my knowledge.
What COULD work is that the type implements cutom type and returns an instance of the
attribute when asked for - BUT - the normal mechanism uses reflection, and it is not
possible to add an attribute to this at runtime.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting
a framework works. Frankly, I can not understand why ANYONE
would like o write SQL by hand anymore.
I answer inline starting with
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: Luca Minudel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2
-consulting.com/ is a starting point. Look for the
EntityBroker.
Besides this there area couple of source generators outside.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Luca Minudel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mittwoch, 12. Februar
No bulk insert, sorry.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Scott Prugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2003 19:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Bulk Insert with ADO.Net(IRowsetFastLoad
Speed depends on usage pattern. Basically - it depends on how you use
the objects. With MBR every access goes through remoting, with
MarhalByValue you get local copies - which sometimes is not what you
want.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Origi
There is also the question of how much overhead a TCP connection
imposes. Even localhost, and even not hirtting the wire - will the
stream not be encoded into TCP packets?
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> Fro
), but this does not
work - I get an exception later when baking the type that not everything
is implemented.
My question - do I REALLY have to emit bytecode for tboth, the abstract
class property AND the interface property? Or is there an easier way?
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd
Not to my knowledge - I rembmer having heard in some discussion that
this was left out due to time or resource constraints. Not ure bout .NET
1.1.
Again, this is "hearsay" - not sure either.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Ori
of what is
actually going on.
"Script kiddies" are normally attacking on well known exploits, and can
normally be kept off guard by basically changing a smal implementation
detail and/or having competent administrators.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#
iddies are not too likely to exploit the newest vulnerability -
this is normally left to hackers knowing their stuff).
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Craft, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, Ja
not have
one, is the worst thing that you can actually have - much worse than not
having an algorythm at all, because then you KNOW that you are
unprotected.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hopper [mailto:
e useful.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
Congratulations. You have propably managed to completly destroy the
advantage of salt in your usage. Using a derived salt value means, at
least to my understanding of the maths involved, that you have just
KILLED the effect.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET
The RFC about CHAP is a good place to loop for this :-)
CHAP was built on the premise that you control a device (where users
login), and the database with passwords, but have an untrusted network
in between. They work with hashes etc.
Not perfect, but a good starter to read.
Regards
Thomas
ese around by the hundreds.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
--
Still writing SQL and dealing with DataSets?
Why dont you use our EntityBroker.
The most advanced o/r and business object toolkit in town.
-Original Message-
From: C
ASICALLY - have every reference variable referencing an Idisposable
implementing style call the correct addref/release functions on the
Idisposable method (compiler injection) and you are combining both
advantages.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
--
Still writin
se from some kind of either parameter or embedded
data.
Anyone ever tried something like this in C#? I mean, there is a
mechanism for CRM (Compensating Resource Manager) in the framework, but
real resource pools?
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can re
Inline - and sometimes not funny :-)
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
--
Still writing SQL and dealing with DataSets?
Why dont you use our EntityBroker.
The most advanced o/r and business object toolkit in town.
-Original Message-
From
Not that I know.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Turneral [mailto:Alex@;INSYSTEK.COM]
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 17:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET CLR network limit?
Running a single app with 5
been modified?
I assume it is not trivial - maybe it is simply technical, but IMHO you
get a lot of points where you have the signature as an important part
(like linking into the GAC), and so it might be a LOT of things to
modify.
Let me second this question - anyone has any metrics?
Thomas
pinArray is big enough? I
mean, if I work with my unmanaged code blocks, then he has no choice,
but here - he can hardly know where the stuff is written in the croutine
called.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hopper
something with the array
...
Hope this works (and helps)!
-Andy Hopper
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:ADVANCED-DOTNET@;DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM] On Behalf Of Thomas
Tomiczek
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
HAVE to use weak references for your collection. Thats the way
it is designed.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Christian Schmitz [mailto:csh@;GEDAS.DE]
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Oktober 2002 15:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED
even
with very low security rights, to my knowledge - the resulting code just
needs to pass the verifier.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Clemens F. Vasters [mailto:clemensv@;NEWTELLIGENCE.COM]
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Oktober 2002 14:37
Thats not really an option. I do this right now, enforcing the class to
be abstract and generating a subclass - thats what I want to get rid of
:-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Jason Whittington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
the way to basically use
properties with "some dummy code" and rewrite them during class load to
contain the correct code.
This, though, is dependant on - well - the ability to do so.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanc
Dont worry. It is wrong.
Inline with ***
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Franklin Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2002 15:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Learning to work with
strongly suggest we restart
with a new email after this run :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Healy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Montag, 14. Oktober 2002 21:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Strongly
What about using a REF array, instead of an int?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Richard Birkby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Montag, 14. Oktober 2002 17:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] FW: Interop
One moment :-)
Means that param 0 contains the size, right? Which is correct - param 2 is the number
of objects returned.
Hm, so much for borrowed code :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Mattias Sjögren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
tilities.FilterUtility.GetPin(IBaseFilter
Filter, PinDirection Direction) in
c:\work\thonaconsulting\directshow\thonaconsulting.directshow\utilities\
filterutility.cs:line 29
> Any clues?
>
> Thomas Tomiczek
> THONA Consulting Ltd.
> (Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
Joseph,
Answers inline...
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Healy [mailto:Joseph.Healy@;AVASYS.COM]
Sent: Samstag, 12. Oktober 2002 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Strongly-Typed DataSets vs.
Strongly-Typed Collections
Thomas,
While I get the drift of you code
work is interesting - we go in different directions,
but your steps make PERFECT sense in the context of the way you are
going to :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Kloosterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 10
Well, just one question - how do you handly type inheritance in this
dataset?
I mean, a typed dataset is typed, or? No subtypes per table depending on
data.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Kloosterman [mailto:[EMAIL
ally move one parameter (which? Any way to
find this out without access to the ID`?) to the return type.
*** Thanks.
<...>
For more detail, see "COM Interop Part 1: C# Client Tutorial" in the
MSDN library.
*** Yes, thanks :-) tel me I am a beginner here :-) No, really -
work under the scenes.
c2.ParticleData and c2.ParticleData are actually shortcuts for going two
level deep into storage hierarchy :-) Every container with "data" in it
is actually three tables (with three objects).
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
is an out parameter?
Thanks in advance.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
pproach):
semiautomatic (possible controlled by attributes). DataSet: By hand. You
losse.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
ts a NULL,
then after all inserts, before the original updates, the value is
updates.
As a result (of this which we could not easily do with datasets) we can
automatically store arbitrary object graphs :-)
No, DataSets were decided to be part of the problem.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(
ent Container subtypes (selected by the
ContainerTyp field) that you can then just call functionaltiy in - OO
programming at it's best.
Thats live code, btw., from a CMS that we are just now working on.
The O/R mapper used was planned to go live yesterday - will ahve to wait
some mor
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
