Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-31 Thread Jason Nah
> > Jeremy > > -Original Message- > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Byron > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:58 PM > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-31 Thread Jeremy Byron
58 PM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency Hi All, Just wanted to update the list with my test results. I modified my test to offload the blocking process to another server. So the CPU stays low on my test machine (single proc

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-31 Thread Jeremy Byron
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Byron Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:41 PM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency Hi Conrad, Thanks for the email. 1 - I agree completely.

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-26 Thread Richard Blewett
USS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency > > Don't forget that WinForms apps run the event thread in a COM STA, so > that > *may* account for some of the serialization of method calls you're > seeing. > > Shouldn't

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-25 Thread Jeremy Byron
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency Jeremy, If I were you I would eliminate the ThreadPool just to be sure that's not your issue. The reason for this is twofold 1) You probably shouldn't be using the ThreadPool for

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-25 Thread Ted Neward
CED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency > > I've also tried hosting the object in IIS and in a WinForms app. Same > result in both cases. > > Jeremy > > > > -Original Message- > From: Discussi

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-23 Thread Conrad Frix
ther thread while waiting for db to return > (that's my biggest concern. I don't want my machine sitting and waiting for > a long-running db call to return). > > Jeremy > > > > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. on behalf of Stoyan

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-22 Thread Jeremy Byron
20/2008 5:59 PM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency Surely you want SingleCall, not Singleton. Couple of questions: Q1: How many machines you're using for the test (I guess 1 for test client and 1 for server)? If 1, then not sure w

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-20 Thread Stoyan Damov
Surely you want SingleCall, not Singleton. Couple of questions: Q1: How many machines you're using for the test (I guess 1 for test client and 1 for server)? If 1, then not sure what you're testing but maybe Q2 needs an answer. Q2. What's your machine like and particularly how many CPUs? Hint: i

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-20 Thread Jeremy Byron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Byron Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:57 PM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency I've also tried hosting the object in IIS and in a WinForms app. Same result in both cases. Jeremy

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-20 Thread Jeremy Byron
OTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency Is this something to do with the server being a console app? I have a nagging feeling that they are single-threaded somewhere. Phil Wilson -Original Message- From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-20 Thread Wilson, Phil
:44 AM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency Hi, Each button-worker-threads uses the following line to get the proxy: retObj = (T)Activator.GetObject(type, "tcp://" + serverName + ":" + port.ToStr

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-20 Thread Jeremy Byron
Original Message- From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Blewett Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:52 AM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency Are the calls using the same

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-20 Thread Richard Blewett
emy Byron > Sent: 20 March 2008 13:30 > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency > > Hello everyone, > > I have been struggling with this for a few weeks now. I have searched > on the web high and low, purchased &q

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting, Threading and Concurrency

2008-03-20 Thread Jeremy Byron
Hello everyone, I have been struggling with this for a few weeks now. I have searched on the web high and low, purchased "advanced" remoting books, searched newsgroups and these discussion group's archives. I see hints of explanations/solutions, but nothing that seems to work or explain what is