Hi Stefan,
Could you send over the *Keywords Performance Report* request where you are
seeing zero impression rows with *includeZeroImpressions* set to *false*?
Please also include your customer ID so I can check it from my side. You
can send it only to me by clicking *Reply privately to
sorry, i meant that we get some rows with zero impressions when we
set includeZeroImpressions to *false*, of course.
Stefan
Am Montag, 24. August 2015 13:59:18 UTC+2 schrieb Stefan Kleine Stegemann:
Hi Josh,
today, we noticed the same behavior for keyword performance reports.
Despite
Hi Josh,
today, we noticed the same behavior for keyword performance reports.
Despite setting includeZeroImpressions to true, we got some rows with no
impressions (includeZeroImpressions=true gives much more rows). Filtering
with a predicate works as expected.
Cheers,
Stefan
Am Freitag,
Hi Stefan,
We're working on this one, but I don't have an ETA just yet for when it
will be fixed. I'll let you know as soon as that happens.
Thanks,
Josh, AdWords API Team
On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 6:01:46 AM UTC-4, Stefan Kleine Stegemann
wrote:
Hi Josh,
are there any updates on
Hi Josh,
are there any updates on this issue so far?
Cheers,
Stefan
Am Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2015 22:13:27 UTC+2 schrieb Josh Radcliff (AdWords
API Team):
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for pointing that out -- I hadn't tried setting it to *true* so
didn't notice the difference in behavior. I'll pass
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for sending over the details to Anthony -- with that information I
was able to reproduce the issue you described. We're following up with the
reporting team to see why this particular report seems to be ignoring the
*includeZeroImpressions=false* setting when the *Date* field
Hi Josh,
thanks for the update. As a side note, it does not seem that the report is
ignoring the flag entirely. If I request the same report with
includeZeroImpressions=true, I get a lot more zero-impression rows. We're
already using the predicate now and it works without problems.
Best wishes,
