Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-05-21 Thread Stefan Kleine Stegemann
When downloading a product partition report with includeZeroImpressions=false, we sometimes get rows with zero impressions. For example, we download a product partition report for a month, segmented by day and get some rows with zero impressions (although includeZeroImpressions is false). When

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-05-21 Thread Anthony Madrigal
Hello, You should not be getting zero impression rows if you are including Date as one of your fields and/or setting includeZeroImpressions=false. Could you *Reply privately to author *the report definition with Date and includeZeroImpressions=false along with the campaign ID that produced zero

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-06-04 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi Stefan, Thanks for sending over the details to Anthony -- with that information I was able to reproduce the issue you described. We're following up with the reporting team to see why this particular report seems to be ignoring the *includeZeroImpressions=false* setting when the *Date* field

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-06-04 Thread Stefan Kleine Stegemann
Hi Josh, thanks for the update. As a side note, it does not seem that the report is ignoring the flag entirely. If I request the same report with includeZeroImpressions=true, I get a lot more zero-impression rows. We're already using the predicate now and it works without problems. Best wishes, S

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-06-04 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi Stefan, Thanks for pointing that out -- I hadn't tried setting it to *true* so didn't notice the difference in behavior. I'll pass that info along to the reporting team. Cheers, Josh, AdWords API Team -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Goog

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-08-21 Thread Stefan Kleine Stegemann
Hi Josh, are there any updates on this issue so far? Cheers, Stefan Am Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2015 22:13:27 UTC+2 schrieb Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team): > > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for pointing that out -- I hadn't tried setting it to *true* so > didn't notice the difference in behavior. I'll p

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-08-21 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi Stefan, We're working on this one, but I don't have an ETA just yet for when it will be fixed. I'll let you know as soon as that happens. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 6:01:46 AM UTC-4, Stefan Kleine Stegemann wrote: > > > Hi Josh, > > are there any updates on

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-08-24 Thread Stefan Kleine Stegemann
Hi Josh, today, we noticed the same behavior for keyword performance reports. Despite setting includeZeroImpressions to true, we got some rows with no impressions (includeZeroImpressions=true gives much more rows). Filtering with a predicate works as expected. Cheers, Stefan Am Freitag, 21.

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-08-24 Thread Stefan Kleine Stegemann
sorry, i meant that we get some rows with zero impressions when we set includeZeroImpressions to *false*, of course. Stefan Am Montag, 24. August 2015 13:59:18 UTC+2 schrieb Stefan Kleine Stegemann: > > > Hi Josh, > > today, we noticed the same behavior for keyword performance reports. > Despi

Re: Behavior of includeZeroImpressions-Flag for Product Partition Report

2015-08-24 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi Stefan, Could you send over the *Keywords Performance Report* request where you are seeing zero impression rows with *includeZeroImpressions* set to *false*? Please also include your customer ID so I can check it from my side. You can send it only to me by clicking *Reply privately to author