You can give 100% of the credit to WISPA. This was not on the FCC
agenda at all. WISPA lobbied the FCC to turn it into an NPRM, how to
expand it, and why. There was plenty of providers that put support
behind it... and of course the HOA lobbying groups fought against it but
we won the day.
It w
turn auto neg off, try flow control on and off. Check your light levels on
all 4 sfp's and make sure they are within spec, if not clean the fibers or
add an attenuator(s)
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:20 PM Josh Baird wrote:
> FWIW - we have a WTM4200 with a CCR2004 on one end and don't have that
>
FWIW - we have a WTM4200 with a CCR2004 on one end and don't have that
issue.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 3:13 PM Joe Novak wrote:
> Test with anything other than a CCR2004. I'd be willing to bet on it being
> the problem.
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:05 PM Jason McKemie <
> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroa
Test with anything other than a CCR2004. I'd be willing to bet on it being
the problem.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:05 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> Are you familiar with the Aviat radios? I cannot seem to find anywhere to
> set flow control on the ethernet interfac
Are you familiar with the Aviat radios? I cannot seem to find anywhere to
set flow control on the ethernet interfaces.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Colin Stanners wrote:
> Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
> link? What model of MT router?
>
> On Thu,
They're both brand new SFPs provided by Aviat. I guess if they have
terrible quality control that could be the issue. That solution would make
a lot more sense to me if it were just one end seeing the issues. I may
have to at least attempt it if nothing else works, however.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021
I have not tried that as of yet. One end is a CCR1009, the other is a
CCR2004. I could try Flow Control on one end to see if it makes a
difference.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Colin Stanners wrote:
> Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
> link? What mo
replace the sfp on both radios
or use the copper port to rule out the latency coming from the rf
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Colin Stanners wrote:
> Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
> link? What model of MT router?
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 1:20 PM J
Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
link? What model of MT router?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 1:20 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> I'm having an issue where about 3-8% of packets going through a WTM4200
> link are seeing a 1-10ms spi
I'm having an issue where about 3-8% of packets going through a WTM4200
link are seeing a 1-10ms spike in latency. Aviat support is not being
particularly helpful, they just say they're seeing CRC errors at one end
and to replace the SFPs and cabling to see if that helps. These have a
fiber conne
But they can say don’t get on the roof for any reason. Don’t dig a hole to
mount a tower. Don’t attach anything to anything.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 6:23 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC and residential antennas (OTARD)
Property is still property.
Property is still property. A landlord can't tell the tenant "no
antenna", but the landlord can say "no holes in my building."
So kind of, but no not really.
On 8/25/2021 5:24 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Am I reading this shit right? Property owners can be forced to be
transmit locations?
On W
12 matches
Mail list logo
