Re: [AFMUG] WAV

thanks From: Ben Royer Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 4:07 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WAV Last I heard, yep. Thank you, Ben Royer, Operations Manager Royell Communications, Inc. 217-965-3699 www.royell.net From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 3:56 PM To:

Re: [AFMUG] McCown Tech surge question

It isn't a technicality, it is a matter of location. If installing in a cabinet where there might be a couple of feet between the entrance and the equipment, I would say you only need one to still be in compliance. If you are installing in a building you should have one at the entrance to short

Re: [AFMUG] WAV

Last I heard, yep. Thank you, Ben Royer, Operations Manager Royell Communications, Inc. 217-965-3699 www.royell.net From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 3:56 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] WAV Is Norm still running WAV?

Re: [AFMUG] McCown Tech surge question

Some surges come in via other routes, most often the power line. So you want to stop those before they hit the equipment. Makes more sense when you have a coax surge arrestor on the outside of the building and an AC surge suppressor on the power input of the same system. A bit redundant when

Re: [AFMUG] McCown Tech surge question

Seems like a technicality. -- Original Message -- From: ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: 12/1/2017 5:02:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] McCown Tech surge question Yes and no. Yes as they will qualify to do both jobs, but you still need two of them to be in compliance with R56.

Re: [AFMUG] McCown Tech surge question

Yes and no. Yes as they will qualify to do both jobs, but you still need two of them to be in compliance with R56. From: Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 3:00 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] McCown Tech surge question This is a question from McCown: I've pasted in a little

[AFMUG] McCown Tech surge question

This is a question from McCown: I've pasted in a little snip from the 2005 Motorola R56 book. With the "belt and suspenders" design approach you've mentioned in the past, would it be fair to say that your products would qualify as both a primary and secondary protection device as defined

[AFMUG] WAV

Is Norm still running WAV?

Re: [AFMUG] welcome to the new normal?

On 12/1/17 10:28 AM, Tim Reichhart wrote: They will be back watch after they hit there monthly caps Well, that's why the big guys want to take all the spectrum for themselves and shut out everyone else.

Re: [AFMUG] handy mib browser

I downloaded this a few weeks ago, about the most no-nonsense one I was able to find as well. On Friday, December 1, 2017, Steve Jones wrote: > im always looking for a quick mib browser thats simple and easy. Half the > time all i want to do is verify the mib and pull

Re: [AFMUG] welcome to the new normal?

They will be back watch after they hit there monthly caps   -Original Message- From: "Joe Novak" To: af@afmug.com Date: 12/01/17 11:58 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] welcome to the new normal? "160GB of Internet usage per month" I usually tell them good luck. On Fri,

Re: [AFMUG] Power a SLAVE PTP230 BH from a syncinjector

Have done it all the time and never even turned sync off. We have pulled almost all PTP230's from network and updated too PTP450's though. Make sure your syncinjector is powered on 24 volt though. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Wireless Administrator wrote: > I have an

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

Install GPS Status on phone and compare findings... Jaime Solorza On Dec 1, 2017 10:21 AM, wrote: > If you could get (borrow) another antenna you might discover it is – or - > is not related to the FM antenna. > > *From:* Eric Muehleisen > *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2017

Re: [AFMUG] Power a SLAVE PTP230 BH from a syncinjector

We have done it. On 12/1/2017 8:48 AM, Wireless Administrator wrote: I have an application where it would be more convenient to power a *_SLAVE _*PTP230 BH from a syncinjector than to use a separate power supply.� I don�t see where this would be a problem and I suppose I could turn sync

Re: [AFMUG] welcome to the new normal?

This type of thing tends to be a marketing positive for us. They leave, they talk their friends who dont have service into getting it, 1-2 years later, they come back with their friend and their cable is still there On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Joe Novak wrote: > "160GB

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

If you could get (borrow) another antenna you might discover it is – or - is not related to the FM antenna. From: Eric Muehleisen Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 10:19 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked We are about 120ft up on a highrise. Mounting

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

We are about 120ft up on a highrise. Mounting options/locations are limited. We plan to move it opposite of the FM antenna and 900mhz noise. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, wrote: > You could temporarily move the antenna. Run a temp cable from the CMM4 > out to the parking

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

You could temporarily move the antenna. Run a temp cable from the CMM4 out to the parking lot or some thing and see if the problem goes away. From: Eric Muehleisen Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 7:51 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked We have a site where we see

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

No ePMP at this site. This is a dedicated GPS antenna off a CMM4. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Andy Trimmell wrote: > I’ve seen this happen when the puck isn’t horizontal. I think that’s why > they made the new ePMP antennas lock that puck in the top so it either

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

That's interesting. The 900mhz noise floor at this location is very loud. State lottery uses a 900mhz MDS radio that is right across the street. We are planning to relocate the GPS antenna to the opposite side of the building next week. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:15 AM, can...@believewireless.net

Re: [AFMUG] welcome to the new normal?

"160GB of Internet usage per month" I usually tell them good luck. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:56 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote: > > this is the third uninstall on that tower this week... > there are only like 21 customers or so down there > > > - Original Message

Re: [AFMUG] welcome to the new normal?

this is the third uninstall on that tower this week... there are only like 21 customers or so down there - Original Message - From: Matt Hoppes To: CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] welcome to the new normal? $20/month isn't

[AFMUG] welcome to the new normal?

from customer service - Talked to Linda. She has gone to AT fixed wireless, also putting a box off her service and at her mom's house. Cost $20 extra per box.

[AFMUG] handy mib browser

im always looking for a quick mib browser thats simple and easy. Half the time all i want to do is verify the mib and pull the correct OID to put into an NMS This one has turned out to be pretty handy as just a bare mib browser (free) without any of the extra stuff

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

I’ve seen this happen when the puck isn’t horizontal. I think that’s why they made the new ePMP antennas lock that puck in the top so it either doesn’t fall off or the tower climber sticks in to the side of something. Puck must be horizontal at all times. Andy Trimmell Systems

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

Check 900MHz noise. We have two sites with high 900MHz noise and those are the ones that have GPS issues. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Wireless Administrator wrote: > Ok …… > I got it now. This was a test.(Tongue-in-cheek)Answer: “It radiation > from a nearby star”Steve

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Smart Antenna

Thanks Jerry That’s about double the length needed but if I don’t find anything Ill go that route. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Head Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 9:16 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Smart Antenna

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

Ok …… I got it now. This was a test. (Tongue-in-cheek) Answer: “It radiation from a nearby star” Steve B. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Wireless Administrator Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 10:26 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

Is it possible to place duplicate equipment at the site to see if the problem occurs on duplicate? Steve From: Wireless Administrator [mailto:wirel...@htn.net] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 9:55 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: RE: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked I’ve had problems

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Smart Antenna

Check amazon and ebay also. Probably a lot cheaper. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Head Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 7:16 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Smart Antenna

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

Brand new GPS antenna and coax cable. Also hasn't rained in quite some time at this location. I should have mentioned that to start. Sorry. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Wireless Administrator wrote: > I’ve had problems like that caused by water/condensation in the GPS >

Re: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked

I’ve had problems like that caused by water/condensation in the GPS antenna or coax. Steve B. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 9:51 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] GPS visible vs tracked We have a site where we

[AFMUG] Power a SLAVE PTP230 BH from a syncinjector

I have an application where it would be more convenient to power a SLAVE PTP230 BH from a syncinjector than to use a separate power supply. I don't see where this would be a problem and I suppose I could turn sync off on the port using SiteMonitor if needed. Can anyone validate this as an

Re: [AFMUG] NetFlow Analyzers

For as small as our operation I have used cacti-ez recently with netflow and its really nice. I only do a few hours when filtering. On 12/01/2017 08:03 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: The people I know using PRTG have left as it doesn't scale and has several other limitations. They've moved to

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Smart Antenna

http://www.l-com.com/coaxial-rp-sma-plug-to-rp-sma-plug-right-angle-pigtail-19-100-series On 11/30/2017 11:50 AM, Andy Trimmell wrote: They only have 1 right angled one and its SMA on one side and RPSMA on the other. I need reversed polarity on both sides. *From:*Af

Re: [AFMUG] NetFlow Analyzers

The people I know using PRTG have left as it doesn't scale and has several other limitations. They've moved to netXMS. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Daniel Gerlach"

Re: [AFMUG] Our panel on top of tank for measuring water levels

Lol.. Jaime Solorza On Dec 1, 2017 6:23 AM, "Matt Corcoran" wrote: > Testing in the field ...Don’t tell me… the client device mounts on the > horse. > > > > *From: *Af on behalf of Jaime Solorza < > losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > *Reply-To:

Re: [AFMUG] Our panel on top of tank for measuring water levels

Testing in the field ...Don’t tell me… the client device mounts on the horse. From: Af on behalf of Jaime Solorza Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 5:18 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: