So T just dropped one of these 3903x units on a new circuit we ordered,
even though we have two spares of their 3930 units on the wall currently.
Nice thing with the 3930s is dual power supplies and 220V input. This 3903x
has a fkin 12VDC wallwart.
Short of throwing a fit with T and tell them we'r
I received some spam on my email address on file with the FCC wanting to
know if I wanted to sell my license but I'm actively using it, so
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Maybe Michael Anderson isn't using WQHV410. Interesting the 2017
> expiration. That's a remin
we felt it not worthy of
> certifying versus the other alternatives available.
>
> Jaime
>
> On Jul 25, 2016, at 8:09 PM, ccie4526 wrote:
>
> Just the B5c? Or is the B5 certified as well? We might need to change an
> order... I just received our 4.9GHz license a couple weeks a
PFsense does a pretty good job if you follow these directions:
http://www.squidworks.net/2012/08/pfsense-2-0-limiting-users-upload-and-download-speeds-by-limiting-bandwidth/
I'm using it to limit public hotspot users up/down speeds per IP.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
>
Just the B5c? Or is the B5 certified as well? We might need to change an
order... I just received our 4.9GHz license a couple weeks ago.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Jaime Fink wrote:
> B5c in 4.9 GHz is Part 90 Subpart Y certified, should get you 200 Mbps+
> aggregate in it’s max allowable
Some days I really hate the gmail interface. That email really was intended
to be sent directly to Matt, not to the whole group. My apologies. /facepalm
...Ron
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:07 PM, ccie4526 wrote:
> Howdy Matt,
>
> Completely unrelated to the 13.4.1 stuff above, I was just
Howdy Matt,
Completely unrelated to the 13.4.1 stuff above, I was just trying to find
an email you had sent so I could reply to it.
I am working on a PMP design for a customer (NDA material right now, but
something you'll want to brag about when it's done, given where it's going
to be), that will
