Re: [AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall

2014-09-30 Thread Shayne Lebrun via Af
: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:03 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall Should I define the source address? I often see DHCP server packets with source of 192.168.1.1 or others. For instance in this case the packets the Mikrotik is catching look like this

Re: [AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall

2014-09-30 Thread George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
Oh Canopy, you're so good to me. BootP filter check, save, reboot. Here's what I do on UBNT: On 9/30/2014 11:03 AM, Ty Featherling via Af wrote: Should I define the source address? I often see DHCP server packets with source of 192.168.1.1 or others. For instance in this case the packets the

Re: [AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall

2014-09-30 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Should I define the source address? I often see DHCP server packets with source of 192.168.1.1 or others. For instance in this case the packets the Mikrotik is catching look like this: forward: in:bridgeWAN(ether5) out:bridgeWAN(sfp1), src-mac 00:16:b6:85:26:b8, proto UDP, 192.168.1.1:67->255.255.

Re: [AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall

2014-09-30 Thread Eric Muehleisen via Af
Have you tried adding the src=0.0.0.0, dst=255.255.255.255 ? On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ty Featherling via Af wrote: > Any reason this wouldn't catch DHCP server traffic from the customer? I > just tried it and the packets are still hitting the firewall on the tower > router. > > -Ty >

[AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall

2014-09-30 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Any reason this wouldn't catch DHCP server traffic from the customer? I just tried it and the packets are still hitting the firewall on the tower router. -Ty