Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-17 Thread Mark Radabaugh
Just wanted to see if the group already knew the answer before I take the subject up with Cambium. It's also useful to have a conversation about the subject here. Cambium does pay attention to this list, even though they would prefer to steer it all to their captive forum. We deployed our fi

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-17 Thread George Skorup
Those are all very good questions that Matt would need to answer. On 1/17/2016 8:39 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: George, I think you understood the question fine - the issue with having anything other than a 450i SM to be able to use the 5.1 and 2 bands is the problem. The selection of SM’s a

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-17 Thread Joe Novak
I only have a rumor. When I spoke to a traveling sales guy he seemed to think that Cambium would be selling a licensed 450i SM (like the 450 line, licensed by bandwidth) _sometime_ this year. That is all we got out of him.. I think Q2 to Q3 was roadmap for it. Joe On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:39

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-17 Thread Mark Radabaugh
George, I think you understood the question fine - the issue with having anything other than a 450i SM to be able to use the 5.1 and 2 bands is the problem. The selection of SM’s available to use in 5.1/2 is currently limited to only the much higher priced 450i SM’s. Is Cambium planning

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-16 Thread Josh Luthman
Filter or something idk Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 16, 2016 6:55 PM, "Gino Villarini" wrote: > why? > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Josh Luthman > wrote: > >> 450d physically can't, so it'll be only integrated...

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-16 Thread Gino Villarini
why? On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > 450d physically can't, so it'll be only integrated... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jan 16, 2016 5:34 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > >> I believe Matt s

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-16 Thread George Skorup
I guess I didn't understand Mark's question. Yeah, so the regular 450 is locked by hardware filter to 5470-5900. 450i APs and SMs do 4940-5925 or maybe 6050. You'll need a 450i SM to use the 5.1 and 5.2 bands. Then if you have any 450 SMs on the sector, all that is moot. On 1/16/2016 4:35 PM,

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-16 Thread Josh Luthman
450d physically can't, so it'll be only integrated... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 16, 2016 5:34 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > I believe Matt said they're still waiting on FCC approval for the lower > bands. > > On 1/16/2016

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-16 Thread George Skorup
I believe Matt said they're still waiting on FCC approval for the lower bands. On 1/16/2016 10:29 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Nope. Just do 5.7 :( Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 16, 2016 8:19 AM, "Mark Radabaugh"

Re: [AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-16 Thread Josh Luthman
Nope. Just do 5.7 :( Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 16, 2016 8:19 AM, "Mark Radabaugh" wrote: > Has Cambium ever said what the plan is with respect to 450i and the lower > 5.1 and 5.2 bands? The 450i AP can run in them at

[AFMUG] 450 and 5.1/5.2Ghz

2016-01-16 Thread Mark Radabaugh
Has Cambium ever said what the plan is with respect to 450i and the lower 5.1 and 5.2 bands? The 450i AP can run in them at high power, but the only SM’s available are the much higher priced 450i integrated or a AP set to SM mode, which makes it cost prohibitive for residential deployment.