Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

has an RFC1918 IP. Test would have to be run on-net. >>>>> >>>>> I just tried a few ping tests from the (Cisco) tower router. 100 >>>>> pings typically comes back around 4/10/35 for min/avg/max. I ran 1000 >>>>> pings though and got 4/11/48, ran ano

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

isco) tower router. 100 pings >>> typically comes back around 4/10/35 for min/avg/max. I ran 1000 pings >>> though and got 4/11/48, ran another 1000 and got 4/12/248. Zero packet >>> loss, but apparently noise can cause an occasional latency spike, probably >>> due to

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

gt;> >> *From:* Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, December 19, 2015 6:15 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-) >> >> Any chance of running 'mtr' against the CPE IP of house #2 a

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

ter. 100 pings >>>> typically comes back around 4/10/35 for min/avg/max. I ran 1000 pings >>>> though and got 4/11/48, ran another 1000 and got 4/12/248. Zero packet >>>> loss, but apparently noise can cause an occasional latency spike, probably >>>> du

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

gt; wrote: >>>>> SM is bridged and has an RFC1918 IP. Test would have to be run on-net. >>>>> >>>>> I just tried a few ping tests from the (Cisco) tower router. 100 pings >>>>> typically comes back around 4/10/35 for min/avg/max. I ra

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

Any chance of running 'mtr' against the CPE IP of house #2 and leaving it for a few hours? I'm curious what the min/max/average latency looks like. On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > So yesterday I did some tweaking on the sync parameters and was able to >

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

parently noise can cause an occasional latency spike, probably > due to upstream. > > > *From:* Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, December 19, 2015 6:15 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-) > > A

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

That is really nice compared to what the other option is for many 900 MHz-viable-only customers: consumer grade VSAT... I would much rather offer somebody a 2 Mbps downstream x 1 Mbps upstream connection that has consistent latency of 5 to 25ms to its gateway, and <1% packet loss, than the

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

, but apparently noise can cause an occasional latency spike, probably due to upstream. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 6:15 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-) Any chance of running 'mtr' against the CPE IP of house #2

[AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

So yesterday I did some tweaking on the sync parameters and was able to get better results. I'll put the details in a second post, but I wanted to update the grim picture I painted the other day. As initially set up, I was only getting 1X MIMO-A, even on a 5 MHz channel and after trying a

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

That tracks nicely with what I've been told, which is a minimum of 3X over FSK, and up to 7X. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com > On Dec 18, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > So yesterday I

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

Very nice! - Original Message - From: Ken Hohhof To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 11:23 AM Subject: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-) So yesterday I did some tweaking on the sync parameters and was able to get better results. I'll

Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450i update with better results :-)

I'd probably buy that. bp On 12/18/2015 9:23 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: So yesterday I did some tweaking on the sync parameters and was able to get better results. I'll put the details in a second post, but I wanted to update the grim picture I painted the other day.