No precise technical term survives the marketing department.
PC
Blaze Broadband
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2014 11:38 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK
AT&T calls thei
AT&T calls theirs a microcell, Verizon calls theirs a network extender,
Sprint calls theirs airave.
The generic, non-vendor-specific term is femtocell.
--
bp
On 12/27/2014 7:25 AM, Josh Baird via Af wrote:
They are branded as "Microcells." I have one at my house.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 7:
They are branded as "Microcells." I have one at my house.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af wrote:
> That's a pico cell, micro cells are what you might find carrier-operated
> in a shopping mall.
> On Dec 26, 2014 6:14 PM, "timothy steele via Af" wrote:
>
>> Just ran into a
This is how we fixed it as well.
-Tim
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Vince West via Af
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 10:39 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK
The best way we found to combat this issue was set up the SM in bridged mode
That's a pico cell, micro cells are what you might find carrier-operated in
a shopping mall.
On Dec 26, 2014 6:14 PM, "timothy steele via Af" wrote:
> Just ran into a ATT microcell that would not work with the SM in NAT
> mode routers WAN was on a DMZ IP anyone else run into this?
>
> Thanks
>
>
MUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK
> Just ran into a ATT microcell that would not work with the SM in NAT mode
> routers WAN was on a DMZ IP anyone else run into this?
> Thanks
> —
> Sent from Mailbox
Af wrote:
> Is LAN IP 192.168.100.x?
>
> *From:* timothy steele via Af
> *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 12:13 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK
>
> Just ran into a ATT microcell that would not work with the SM in NAT mode
>
Is LAN IP 192.168.100.x?
From: timothy steele via Af
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 12:13 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK
Just ran into a ATT microcell that would not work with the SM in NAT mode
routers WAN was on a DMZ IP anyone else run into this
It's a known issue. I think the problem is fragmented packets, but
don't quote me on that.
It's fixed in 13.2, but that's only available on 430/450 PMP platforms.
I don't think it is on 13.1.2,. which (I think) is the last release for
FSK. Too bad, because there are several little niggling f
Just ran into a ATT microcell that would not work with the SM in NAT mode
routers WAN was on a DMZ IP anyone else run into this?
Thanks
—
Sent from Mailbox
10 matches
Mail list logo
