Re: [AFMUG] ptp400 4.9

I would be interested in them. I still have some up we use for low bandwidth radio IP links. If you want to sell them give me a shout. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:35 PM That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > do these integrated units have any value to anybody, we have them, we

[AFMUG] ptp400 4.9

do these integrated units have any value to anybody, we have them, we couldnt use them even if we wanted to -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 5800-09-02 SW

offlist On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: > Can someone send me this or let me knwo where to grab it from. I have an > old radio link I need to match up to. >

[AFMUG] PTP400 5800-09-02 SW

Can someone send me this or let me knwo where to grab it from. I have an old radio link I need to match up to.

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 SW

Sent offline On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: > Does anyone have the latest SW? I ought some used units and they have > different versions on them. >

[AFMUG] PTP400 SW

Does anyone have the latest SW? I ought some used units and they have different versions on them.

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400

inferring SNR from bit error rate. From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 2:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 i believe thats one of the stats you can use to find out what direction youre misaligned in, I dont remember how On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Ty

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400

i believe thats one of the stats you can use to find out what direction youre misaligned in, I dont remember how On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > An error on the vector. Sorry, too easy to pass up. > > Vector Error: The vector error measurement compares the received signa

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400

An error on the vector. Sorry, too easy to pass up. Vector Error: The vector error measurement compares the received signal's In phase / Quadrature (IQ) modulation characteristics to an ideal signal to determine the composite error vector magnitude. The results are stored in a histogram and expres

[AFMUG] PTP400

What does vector error indicate?

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 to PTP450 comparison?

: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 9:10 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 to PTP450 comparison? It is going to be -12F tomorrow, plus windchill. I hate the idea of R&D in the cold weather. I’ll give $150 on paypal for decent info with comparisons PTP400 upgraded to PTP450, using the

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 to PTP450 comparison?

want in a test plan & I will share it when we do our R&D. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joe via Af Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 1:22 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] PTP400 to PTP450 comparison? Has anyone played with direct comparisons of swapping

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 to PTP450 comparison?

The PTP450 comes in a connectorized version. -- bp On 11/24/2014 8:47 PM, TJ Trout via Af wrote: You can't swap PTP400 to 450 and keep the same antenna? PTP 400 is integrated or N-connector and a 450 is a SM style like the BH10/BH20?? On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Joe via Af

Re: [AFMUG] PTP400 to PTP450 comparison?

You can't swap PTP400 to 450 and keep the same antenna? PTP 400 is integrated or N-connector and a 450 is a SM style like the BH10/BH20?? On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Joe via Af wrote: > Has anyone played with direct comparisons of swapping a PTP400 out > directly for the PTP450, keeping ex

[AFMUG] PTP400 to PTP450 comparison?

Has anyone played with direct comparisons of swapping a PTP400 out directly for the PTP450, keeping existing antennas in place? Anything on noise floor / power level / throughput / distance on the PTP400 compared to the Link Planner, and then changed out to the PTP450 with same measurements?