Re: [AFMUG] Stand off for 2.4 omni on Rohn 45

2017-09-15 Thread Dave
BOOM!! Mind Blown :) On 09/14/2017 10:05 PM, Steve Jones wrote: If you can find the archives from the old motorola forums. There was an in depth discusssion about this. The guy who did the flashlight comparison for atpc was the lead ( i really wish i could name him, hes the guy who walked

Re: [AFMUG] Stand off for 2.4 omni on Rohn 45

2017-09-14 Thread Steve Jones
If you can find the archives from the old motorola forums. There was an in depth discusssion about this. The guy who did the flashlight comparison for atpc was the lead ( i really wish i could name him, hes the guy who walked me through our first, and best performing 900mhz site, his company tag

Re: [AFMUG] Stand off for 2.4 omni on Rohn 45

2017-09-14 Thread George Skorup
Used to use a bunch of Andrew/CommScope S-200 sidearms with Cyclone 2450-360.15's mostly near the top of Rohn 25 and 45. 2' stand off seemed to work fine. On 9/14/2017 9:26 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: http://www.tiltek.com/doc/AppNote3.pdf I'd try 2-3ft, far enough to reduce pattern ripple and

Re: [AFMUG] Stand off for 2.4 omni on Rohn 45

2017-09-14 Thread Colin Stanners
http://www.tiltek.com/doc/AppNote3.pdf I'd try 2-3ft, far enough to reduce pattern ripple and tower shadow but close enough for some maintenance On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Jay Weekley wrote: > How far from a leg of a Rohn 45 would you put a 2.4 omni to

[AFMUG] Stand off for 2.4 omni on Rohn 45

2017-09-14 Thread Jay Weekley
How far from a leg of a Rohn 45 would you put a 2.4 omni to prevent or minimize any kind of shadow effect? I believe the omni we have is from KP Performance and the bracket will have the antenna about a quarter inch from the leg and the top of the tower is not available.