o know what is offloaded.
>
>
>
> We stay with MT for routing. As it works and we are used to Winbox. Very
> efficient.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Josh Reynolds
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 8. Februar 2016 16:33
> *An:* af@afmug
speeds.
>>
>>
>>
>> Same is with UBNT offloading HW. You need to know what is offloaded.
>>
>>
>>
>> We stay with MT for routing. As it works and we are used to Winbox. Very
>> efficient.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* Af [
@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti EdgeRouters?
Does "use both" count? :)
Mikrotik has a much better GUI for network operators. It's fast and informative
and even works well on mobile. UBNT's is geared more to consumer-ish-es? :)
MikroTik has a larger price range/variety.
EdgeRouter
; Same is with UBNT offloading HW. You need to know what is offloaded.
>
>
>
> We stay with MT for routing. As it works and we are used to Winbox. Very
> efficient.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Josh Reynolds
> *Gesendet:* Mon
n one cpu and max it out. This does not mean the CCR cant
>> forward higher speeds.
>>
>>
>>
>> Same is with UBNT offloading HW. You need to know what is offloaded.
>>
>>
>>
>> We stay with MT for routing. As it works and we are used to Win