You’re right, Bill. The filter rules I mentioned are not necessary. I was
thinking of the NAT masquerade rule.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 11:01 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] accessing router behind canopy NAT
If
all rules then the MT won’t pass any traffic.
> You still have the 4 accept rules (2 forward and 2 input) in there right?
>
> Mike
>
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 11:39 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subj
s (2 forward and 2 input) in
there right?
Mike
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 11:39 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] accessing router behind canopy NAT
no havn't tried different port numbers
Kurt Fankhauser
: [AFMUG] accessing router behind canopy NAT
no havn't tried different port numbers
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com<http://www.wavelinc.com/>
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:50 PM, J
no havn't tried different port numbers
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> If it's DMZed I can't imagine why you wouldn't be able to talk
If it's DMZed I can't imagine why you wouldn't be able to talk to it, have
you tried different port numbers on the MT?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I disabled all the fir
I disabled all the firewall rules so nothing should be blocking.
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Uhm... No interfaces at all? Do you
If we have a managed router (specifically MT) behind the SM we generally
bridge the SM.
bp
On 3/31/2015 9:36 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
If you manage the customer router (such as a Mikrotik) do you
generally run the SM in NAT or bridged mode? I have been doing NAT on
the Canopy SM's with the
Uhm... No interfaces at all? Do you have the default config on there
blocking it?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 31, 2015 12:42 PM, "Kurt Fankhauser" wrote:
> Which way Josh? With the NAT doing the DMZ trick? I dunno it just
Which way Josh? With the NAT doing the DMZ trick? I dunno it just doesn't
work for some reason.
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Why c
Why can't you access MT routers that way?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
wrote:
> If you manage the customer router (such as a Mikrotik) do you generally
> run the SM in NAT or bri
If you manage the customer router (such as a Mikrotik) do you generally run
the SM in NAT or bridged mode? I have been doing NAT on the Canopy SM's
with the DMZ trick to the first IP address but when doing that I can't
access the Mikrotik routers that way. Kind of wanted to keep the NAT in
place be
12 matches
Mail list logo
