I suggest that there are more than 500
reasons that you shouldn't be in existence, yet you are.
If one of your 500 reasons were refuted, you would still have 499
to argue about. Not much point in discussing is there?
Stan (me), once bold, brash, cocksure, atheist and obviou
On 5/27/20 12:50 AM, Alan Grimes via AGI wrote:
It's not really clear to me how we can respond to this. I sure as hell
don't want a world dominated by Microsoft's AGI. I want AGI completely
unecumbered by external constraints for my own private use.
Microsoft has a culture of acting as if no o
Speaking of Architecture,
speaking to Immortal D.
What is in your architecture to deal with the purpose problem?
Note: I am not asking to start a discussion about "friendly AI."
What I want to know is how the heavily neural net construction of
Immortal Discoveries
On 5/25/20 2:36 PM, Alan Grimes via AGI wrote:
Ok, it seems we have lost a concept here, that of metaprogramming. In
classic interpreted languages such as Lisp, etc, it was possible to
write programs that write programs.
When you think of AGI that needs to optimize itself for its platform and
ou are is God's gift to you, what
you become is your gift to God.”On 5/23/20 6:02 AM, Matt Mahoney wrote:On Thu, May 21, 2020, 5:25
PM Stanley Nilsen <senil...@ghvalley.net>
wrote:
I don't see how belief in the possibility AI is rea
On 5/20/20 10:24 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
But anyone who believes that AI is possible must logically reject this
idea if they accept that all human behavior is computable.
It's probable that human behavior is computable - but it takes an
immense amount of data - both the present and the p
Watched a couple episodes of "Upload" on
Amazon Prime. It helps to give some perspective on the difference
between "continue to have experiences" and living life.
I personally look at eternal life as only being worth living
because it is a rich experience that was created
On 5/9/20 3:41 AM,
immortal.discover...@gmail.com wrote:I'm really excited if even just one of yous can advance the
AGI design I'm at. I've seen a lot of ANN variants like variants
of GANs, LSTMs, Autoencoders, etc etc, they seem to have things
like residual connection
On 2/22/20 1:22 AM, WriterOfMinds wrote:
...
I recommend looking up the "orthogonality thesis" and doing some
reading thereon. Morality, altruism, "human values," etc. are
distinct from intellectual capacity, and must be intentionally incorporated
into AGI if you w
On 2/21/20 9:24 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:On Fri, Feb 21, 2020,
12:03 PM Stanley Nilsen <senil...@ghvalley.net>
wrote:comments inserted below (always appreciate
Matt's posts.) On 2/20/20 8:05 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:The goal of AGI is to aut
comments inserted below (always appreciate
Matt's posts.) On 2/20/20 8:05 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:The goal of AGI is to automate human labor. It requires solving hard
problems like vision, language, robotics, art, and modeling human
behavior.
We may have different ideas of the goal of AGI.
Hi Tim,
Interesting that your talk mentions simplicity and Occam's razor but
doesn't seem to head in the simple direction.
Jumping down into the laws of physics is one example. Weren't people
fairly intelligent when they knew little about physics and the laws of
nature? Yes, there is the "re
On 10/5/19 6:00 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
It probably takes a few hundred bits to describe the laws of physics.
But an even simpler model, requiring vastly more computation, is that
all possible universes with all possible laws of physics exist, and we
necessary observe one where it is poss
"So exactly what do you hope to accomplish?"
Great question Matt. It haunts me and I imagine that others are
considering what their answer might be.
In re-reading your post there are a couple of statements that help to
clarify for me what I want to accomplish. For example:
"Automating lab
Greetings Alan,
I'm thinking that we may be like the blind men feeling the elephant.
Not sure we are looking at the same components. My concept of
abstraction and promoters is only meant to be a mechanism to solve a
very small function of an AGI. The problem to be solved is how to
choose
response's below
On 10/29/18 1:32 AM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI
wrote:
The question is, how should such a component of
abstraction/deabstraction be successfully engineered as a
component of an AGI service? Considering what you shared about
On 10/28/18 6:14 PM, Jim Bromer via AGI wrote:... thinking
of how abstraction might be used to produce recognition. First of all,
a useful abstraction might rely on an algorithm not only to get it out
of a data (or a 'text') but the data or some characteristic of the
data might need to be p
Steve,
My explanation relates to my view of intelligence and goes
something like this...
Life consists of accumulating know how and a set of values.
Together these lead a person to gain "opportunity." What is
important about opportunity is that it's not opportunity un
https://becominghuman.ai/the-third-wave-of-ai-1579ea97210b
and
https://medium.com/@petervoss/my-ai-articles-f154c5adfd37 From: Stanley Nilsen
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 11:10 AMTo: Stefan Reich via AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Architecture 101
user input, bot output &
facts.There are also meta rules and facts (those which
talk about other rules and facts).Stanley Nilsen <senil...@ghvalley.net>
schrieb am Fr., 31. Aug. 2018 04:59:A few
thoughts...If an
intelligent devic
A few thoughts...If an intelligent
device is to be planned and built according to a modular
architecture, it would be appropriate to determine what the
“storage” of the intelligence looks like. What will the device
contain that makes it intelligent? Are these “blocks” of
Greetings Duncan,
I looked at the document you attached. I appreciate that you at least
made an attempt to come to an "architecture." In the past (several
years) this list has discussed the AGI architecture several times.
Usually the discussion doesn't last long and quickly diverges to more
22 matches
Mail list logo
