On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:33:13PM +, Russell Wallace wrote:
What simulation algorithms did you have in mind with that data
Anything vaguely physical, and doing long-range interactions
by iteration of overlapping local neighbourhoods. It's not much of a
constraint. Of course, you have to
On 3/7/07, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anything vaguely physical, and doing long-range interactions
by iteration of overlapping local neighbourhoods. It's not much of a
constraint. Of course, you have to add more data to the volume
element, depending on what you want to do.
I'm
I can confirm from practical experimentation that 8bit integers are too
coarse to be able to model the probability density of a three dimensional
space using the classic occupancy grid mapping method, but that you can just
about get away with using 16bits for some applications. Personally I'm
Just noticed this on Slashdot.
Open source but not free software, for those of you for whom this makes a
difference.
http://www.numenta.com/for-developers/software.php
Josh
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
It might however be worth thinking about the licence:
Confidentiality. 1. Protection of Confidential Information. You agree that
all code, inventions, algorithms, business concepts, workflow, ideas, and
all other business, technical and financial information, including but not
limited to the
That's pretty evil. I wouldn't use the Numenta software simply on the basis
of this licence.
On 07/03/07, Shane Legg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might however be worth thinking about the licence:
Confidentiality. 1. Protection of Confidential Information. You agree that
all code,
On 2/19/07, John Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Logical deduction or inference is not thought. It is mechanical symbol
manipulation that can can be programmed into any scientific pocket
calculator.
[...]
Hi John,
I admire your attitude for attacking the core AI issues =)
One is
On 3/2/07, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about English? Irregular grammar is only a tiny part of the language
modeling problem. Uaing an artificial language with a regular grammar to
simplify the problem is a false path. If people actually used Logban
then
it would be used in
I agree with Ben and Pei etc on this issue. Narrow AI is VERY different
from general AI. It is not at all easy to integrate several narrow
AI applications to a single, functioning system. I have never heard of
something like this being done, even for two computer vision programs.
IMO what we
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 10:34, YKY (Yan King Yin) wrote:
I discovered something cool: computational pragmatics. You may take a
look at Jerry R Hobbs' paper: Interpretation as Abduction, ...
Nice. Note that one of the reasons that I'm going the numerical route is that
some powerful methods
YKY (Yan King Yin) wrote:
I agree with Ben and Pei etc on this issue. Narrow AI is VERY
different from general AI. It is not at all easy to integrate several
narrow AI applications to a single, functioning system. I have never
heard of something like this being done, even for two computer
--- YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/07, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about English? Irregular grammar is only a tiny part of the language
modeling problem. Uaing an artificial language with a regular grammar to
simplify the problem is a false path. If
On 3/7/07, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A more interesting question to think about, rather than how to represent
a story in a formal language, is: How would you convince yourself that
your AGI actually understood a story? What kind of question-answers or
behaviors would convince you
Well - that's one way to steal work. Thanks Jeff!
No wonder they are letting people at it. They must be using the same
lawyers Microsoft uses :-o
Thanks for the heads up Shane. I'm very bad about just blindly
accepting terms of use, and licenses.
~Aki
On 7-Mar-07, at 10:02 AM, Bob
14 matches
Mail list logo
