How much of OpenCog will be finally opensource? 100%? Or will it be
partially open?
IMO the partial-open model still has the problems of both open and closed
source models: the open parts cannot make much money, and the closed parts
cannot recieve public input. Though, I appreciate that Ben
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/16-02/ff_aimystery?currentPage=all
I guess the moral here is Stay away from attempts to hand-program a
database of common-sense assertions.
--
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute
Well, Lenat survives...
But he paid people to build his database (Cyc)
What's depressing is trying to get folks to build a commonsense KB for
free ... then you
get confronted with the absolute stupidity of what they enter, and the
poverty and
repetitiveness of their senses of humor... ;-p
ben
Some thoughts of mine on the article.
http://streebgreebling.blogspot.com/2008/01/singh-and-mckinstry.html
On 19/01/2008, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/16-02/ff_aimystery?currentPage=all
I guess the moral here is Stay away from
Quality is an issue, but it's really all about volume. Provided that
you have enough volume the signal stands out from the noise.
The solution is probably to make the knowledge capture into a game or
something that people will do as entertainment. Possibly the Second
Life approach will provide
This thread has nothing to do with artificial general intelligence -
please close this thread. Thanks
Sorry, but I have to say that I strongly disagree. There are
many aspects of agi that are non-technical and organizing
one's own live while doing ai is certainly one of them. That's
why I think
On Jan 19, 2008 5:53 PM, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread has nothing to do with artificial general intelligence -
please close this thread. Thanks
IMO, this thread is close enough to AGI to be list-worthy.
It is certainly true that knowledge-entry is not my preferred
approach to AGI ...
This thread has nothing to do with artificial general intelligence -
please close this thread. Thanks
Bob Mottram wrote:
Quality is an issue, but it's really all about volume. Provided that
you have enough volume the signal stands out from the noise.
The solution is probably to make the
Breeds There a Man...? by Isaac Asimov
On Saturday 19 January 2008 04:42:30 pm, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/16-02/ff_aimystery?currentPage=all
I guess the moral here is Stay away from attempts to hand-program a
database of common-sense
I've posted a brief design document for the Texai bootstrap dialog system on my
blog.
http://texai.org/blog/2008/01/20/bootstrap-dialog-system-design
-Steve
Stephen L. Reed
Artificial Intelligence Researcher
http://texai.org/blog
http://texai.org
3008 Oak Crest Ave.
Austin, Texas, USA 78704
The article on the fate of the two AI researchers was interesting. Perhaps
many here share their belief that AGI will vastly change the world. It is
however unfortunate that they did not seek medical help for their symptoms of
depression - no one needs to suffer that kind of pain. They were
--- Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/16-02/ff_aimystery?currentPage=all
Turing also committed suicide.
Building a copy of your mind raises deeply troubling issues. Logically, there
is no need for it to be conscious; it only needs to
On Jan 19, 2008 8:24 PM, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/16-02/ff_aimystery?currentPage=all
Turing also committed suicide.
That's a personal solution to the Halting problem I do not plan to
Turing also committed suicide.
And Chislenko. Each of these people had different circumstances, and
suicide strikes everywhere, but I wonder if there is a common thread.
Joshua
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go
14 matches
Mail list logo
