Peter Voss wrote:
Thanks, Ben.
The technical details of our design and business plan details are indeed
confidential. All I can really say publicly is that we are confident that we
have pretty direct path to high-level AGI from where we are, and that we
have an extremely viable business plan to
Mark Waser wrote:
he makes a direct reference to goal driven systems, but even more
important he declares that these bad behaviors will *not* be the result
of us programming the behaviors in at the start but in an MES
system nothing at all will happen unless the designer makes an explicit
de
Thanks, Ben.
The technical details of our design and business plan details are indeed
confidential. All I can really say publicly is that we are confident that we
have pretty direct path to high-level AGI from where we are, and that we
have an extremely viable business plan to make this happen. In
Peter has some technical info on his overall (adaptive neural net)
based approach to AI, on his company website, which is based on a
paper he wrote in the AGI volume Cassio and I edited for Springer
(written 2002, published 2006).
However, he has kept his specific commercial product direction tigh
... on this:
http://www.adaptiveai.com/news/index.htm
" Towards Commercialization
It's been a while. We've been busy. A good kind of busy.
At the end of March we completed an important milestone: a demo system
consolidating our prior 10 months' work. This was followed by my annual
pilgrimag
Several comments . . . .
First, this work is hideously outdated. The author cites his own reading
for some chapters he produced in 1992.
His claim that the dominant paradigms for studying language comprehension
imply that it is an archival process is *at best* hideously outdated -- if
indee
Preparation for Situated Action
http://psychology.emory.edu/cognition/barsalou/papers/Barsalou_DP_1999_situated_comprehension.pdf
This is what Stephen and I were discussing a while back - but it neatly
names the alternative approaches to language. Most AGI language
comprehension treats it as i
he makes a direct reference to goal driven systems, but even more
important he declares that these bad behaviors will *not* be the result
of us programming the behaviors in at the start but in an MES
system nothing at all will happen unless the designer makes an explicit
decision to put some
Kaj Sotala wrote:
Richard,
again, I must sincerely apologize for responding to this so
horrendously late. It's a dreadful bad habit of mine: I get an e-mail
(or blog comment, or forum message, or whatever) that requires some
thought before I respond, so I don't answer it right away... and the
> From: Mike Tintner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> John:The synchronous melodies of the crickets strumming their legs,
> changes
> harmony as the wind moves warmthness. The reeds vibrate; the birds,
> fearing
> the snake, break their rhythmic falsetto polyphonies and flutter away to
> new
> pastur
The environmental complexities are different. NYC has been there for
hundreds of years. Human brain has been in nature for hundreds of thousands
of years. A manmade environment for AGI is custom made in the beginning; we
don't just throw it out on the street or into the jungle. It can start off
in
11 matches
Mail list logo