On Jun 3, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Mike Tintner wrote:
Thanks. I must confess to my usual confusion/ignorance here - but
perhaps I should really have talked of "solid" rather than "3-D
mapping."
When you sit in a familiar chair, you have, I presume, a solid
mapping (or perhaps the word should be
- Original Message
From: Steve Richfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
3-- integrative ... which itself is a very broad category with a lot
of heterogeneity ... including e.g. systems composed of wholly
distinct black boxes versus systems that have intricate real-time
feedbacks between different c
Steve Richfield trolled like an Alaska fisherman:
>
> It has come to my attention that some of the mysterious
> masked men here are located in the Seattle/Bellevue area,
> as I now am. Perhaps we should get together face-to-face
> and discuss rather than type our thoughts?
>
> Steve Richfield
B
Richard,
On 6/8/08, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You also failed to address my own previous response to you: I basically
> said that you make remarks as if the whole of cognitive science does not
> exist.
Quite the contrary. My point is that not only does cognitive science f
Ben,
On 6/8/08, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must be
> first overcome " - Dr Samuel Johnson
... to whose satisfaction? Here on this forum, there are only two groups of
"judges":
1. The people who are actually writing the
Matthias,
On 6/8/08, Dr. Matthias Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In short, most people on this
> > list appear to be interested only in HOW to straight-line program an AGI
> > (with the implicit assumption that we operate anything at all like we
> appear
> > to operate), but not in WHAT to
Bob,
On 6/8/08, Bob Mottram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/6/8 Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Those of us w/ experience in the field have heard the objections you
> > and Tintner are making hundreds or thousands of times before. We have
> > already processed the arguments you're makin
Jim, Ben, et al,
On 6/10/08, Jim Bromer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ben wrote:
>
> I think that AGI, right now,
The thing that "stumbled" me when I first got here, is understanding just
what is meant here by "AGI". It is NOT the process that goes on behind our
eyeballs, as that is clearly an
Ben wrote:
I think that AGI, right now, could also be analyzed as having four
main approaches
1-- logic-based ... including a host of different logic formalisms
2-- neural net/ brain simulation based ... including some biologically
quasi-realistic systems and some systems that are more formal an
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Ricky Loynd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vladimir, that's a nice, tight overview of a design. What drives the
> creation/deletion of nodes?
>
In current design, skills are extended through relearning and
fine-tuning of existing circuits. Roughly, new memories are
10 matches
Mail list logo
