Oh my, I've been very tired the other day! (as my English there
shows...) I'm sorry for spamming the list.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak lukst...@gmail.com wrote:
I am initially interested but please consider other propositions as
If useful, my paper on http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.NE/0605065 has an
exhaustive bibliography up to 2005.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
I'm considering writing a paper on hypercomputation, and am wondering if
anyone on this list could suggest a good
That's great ... do you have knowledge of other more recent references as
well?
thx
ben
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Hector Zenil hzen...@gmail.com wrote:
If useful, my paper on http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.NE/0605065 has an
exhaustive bibliography up to 2005.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:03
I haven't followed the subject lately but there is a very recent book
published by Springer:
Apostolos Syropoulos, Hypercomputation: Computing beyond the
Church-Turing barrier, Springer, 2008.
However, I am afraid that I find it very mediocre in all aspects (from
full of typos to wrong
Thanks. This is transfer *within* a single domain (from simpler to more complex
levels)? Is anyone attempting transfer *across* domains - e.g. from a
Blocksworld domain to a Keepaway domain, and not just within them?
Ben:
I just read an interesting (somewhat mathy) paper on transfer
yes, there is work like that referenced on the other page linked to there
... but I happen to find the technique in this paper particularly
interesting even though the initial application is somewhat lame...
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Mike Tintner tint...@blueyonder.co.ukwrote:
Thanks.
I just read an interesting (somewhat mathy) paper on transfer learning,
and put the link here
http://www.opencog.org/wiki/Transfer_Learning
ben
--
Ben Goertzel, PhD
CEO, Novamente LLC and Biomind LLC
Director of Research, SIAI
b...@goertzel.org
I intend to live forever, or die trying.
--
Oh my, I've been very tired the other day! (as my English there
shows...) I'm sorry for spamming the list.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak lukst...@gmail.com wrote:
I am initially interested but please consider other propositions as
I'm considering writing a paper on hypercomputation, and am wondering if
anyone on this list could suggest a good bibliography on the topic ... I
want to read up on the latest literature to be sure my thoughts are original
before writing the paper...
thx
ben
--
Ben Goertzel, PhD
CEO,
From: Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org
I'm considering writing a paper on hypercomputation, ...
If I understand right, hypercomputation is theoretical computer
science arguments of the form If I had an oracle for the halting
problem, then... or If I had a machine that could complete an
infinite
I'm going to write a paper
A)
demonstrating completely clearly why
the idea of hypercomputation is scientifically useless
B)
pointing out that, while it *is* logically possible that AGI requires
hypercomputation, if so the implication is that AGI can
never be created or understood via scientific
Moshe and Ben,
I feel I understand much of Novamente, even parts that I haven't heard
explained, because it is quite similar to ideas I had developed before ever
hearing about Novamente.
But I have never quite understood the role of MOSES in Novamene.
I do not question the power of
Ed,
Consider a probabilistic implication of the general form
Context Procedure == Goal
meaning
(if Context C is present) (Procedure P is executed) == (Goal G is
satisfied)
Suppose that C and G are known but P is not known
Then, MOSES may be used to find P
That is, if the system knows what
Ben,
Thanks for your reply, It was helpful.
Your answer causes me to ask in what brain-like thinking processes would
MOSES be a win over just having the hypergraph itself compute candidate
solutions?
Hofstader's Copycat has shown that: (a) various relaxations of a given
multiple
14 matches
Mail list logo
