Sorry for spam.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Ekrem Erdal Bektas
erdalbek...@gmail.comwrote:
LinkedIn
Ekrem Erdal Bektas requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
Jean-Paul,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Ekrem Erdal
As far as I can tell right now, my theories that Solomonoff Induction is
trans-infinite were wrong. Now that I realize that the mathematics do not
support these conjectures, I have to acknowledge that I would not be able to
prove or even offer a sketch of a proof of my theories. Although I did
When we listen to music there are many elements that come into play that
create our memory of how the song goes. If you take a piece of instrumental
music, you have the melody, a succession of tones in a certain order,
duration of each note in the melody, timbre, or tonal quality, (guitar vs
Arthur,
The section from The Arthur T. Murray/Mentifex, FAQ, 2.3 What do
researchers in academia think of Murray’s work?, really puts you into a
whole other category in my view. The rest of us can only dream of such
dismissals from experts who haven't achieved anything more than the rest
of us.
David,
There must be a fair amount of cog sci/AI analysis of all this - of how the
brain analyses and remembers tunes - and presumably leading theories (as for
vision). Do you or anyone know more here?
Also, you have noted something of extreme importance, wh. is a lot more than a
step
Sure. Thanks Arthur.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 10:42 AM, A. T. Murray menti...@scn.org wrote:
David Jones wrote:
Arthur,
Thanks. I appreciate that. I would be happy to aggregate some of those
things. I am sometimes not good at maintaining the website because I get
bored of maintaining or
That's interesting, and I think I agree mostly, at least abstractly. So
this is really just a high-level comment on how to approach creativity,
correct? I guess the title Mathematics of Creativity is what confused
me. None of this suggests any real mathematical or computational
perspective that
Jim,
I'll argue that solomonoff probabilities are in fact like Pi, that is,
computable in the limit.
I still do not understand why you think these combinations are necessary. It
is not necessary to make some sort of ordering of the sum to get it to
converge: ordering only matters for infinite
Mike,
All chinese look the same for me. But for a chinese person they don't. Why
is this? Is there another clue here?
Thanks,
Deepak
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Mike Tintner tint...@blueyonder.co.ukwrote:
David,
There must be a fair amount of cog sci/AI analysis of all this - of how
It seems to me that the hardest thing for AI to comprehend would be the
evolutionary and social aspects of intelligence. What is good for today may
not be good for tomorrow or vice verse. As an example, the acceptance of
Stravinsky's The right of Spring as a great work of art/music. When it was
Deepak,
I have some insight on this question. There was a study regarding change
blindness. One of the study's famous experiments was having a person ask for
directions on a college campus. Then in the middle of this, a door would
pass between the person asking directions and the student giving
Deepak,
No it's basically a distraction from the problem. With time and closer
inspection, they will all look different.
Correction, it IS useful. It probably tells us something about how the brain
and an AGI must work
First you start with a round blob shape for a class of objects - a face
thanks Dave,
This means that there is a system in the brain that decides on the details
that we capture from our external environment. Something like an auto focus
or a system that increases or decreases the resolution of the picture as it
deems fit. We could call this an auto attention focusing
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Jim Bromer jimbro...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh yeah. I forgot about some of Arthur's claims about Mentiflex which
seemed a bit exaggerated. Oh well.
Jim Bromer
World War II was a bit of a tussle, too.
-Chris
---
agi
Okay Mike,
Let me write down my theory of this phenomenon. my intuition is that brain
learns in steps and deltas. The brain takes in a fixed amount of only new
information at a time. So when a person who doesn't have too much
impressions (image memories) of a chinese person sees a chinese, He
I'm not sure that's too diff. from what I'm saying.
The interesting question is what does the brain use as its general class model
against wh. to compare new individuals? It's unlikely to be a or the first
individual face/object as you seem to be suggesting.
Another factor here is that you
My theory is that there is no general class. What ever you see new is a new
class for you. If you see that again then this becomes a variation of the
earlier class. Basically the brain is able to detect if something it sees in
new and store it along with an emotion of excitement. This is why young
I saw the following post from Antonio Alberti, on the linked-in
discussion group:
ALife and AGI
Dear group participants.
The relation among AGI and ALife greatly interests me. However, too few recent
works try to relate them. For exemple, many papers presented in AGI-09
Jim,
Fair enough.
Oh, and Matt: kudos for being better at patiently explaining details than
me.
--Abram
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Jim Bromer jimbro...@gmail.com wrote:
Abram,
We all have some misconceptions about this, and about related issues. Let
me think about this more
19 matches
Mail list logo
