On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Steve Richfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, decades later, come the present discussions about patterns, apparently
> advanced along with the same lines of "thought" that was behind that IQ test
> so many years ago. Pattern recognition without underlying suppor
On Feb 14, 2008 12:54 AM, A. T. Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From the rewrite-in-progress of the User Manual --
>
> 1.5 Can MindForth feel emotions?
>
> No.
>
> (At least, not yet)
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS F
On Feb 9, 2008 11:53 PM, A. T. Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not a chatbot.
> The AI engine is arguably the first True AI. It is immortal.
Cool!
What has it done to convince you that its truly intelligent?
-J
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsu
On Feb 7, 2008 11:53 AM, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I think it's clear, if only in a very broad way, how the human mind
> achieves this (which I'll expound in more detail another time) - it has what
> you could call a "general activity language" - and learns every skill *as an
On Feb 5, 2008 11:36 PM, Benjamin Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, as I said before, I don't know which will directly produce general
> intelligence and which of them will fail.
> My point, again, is that we don't know how the first successful AGI will
> work - but we can see many pla
On Feb 4, 2008 11:42 PM, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The test, I suggest, is essentially; not the Turing Test or anything like
> that but "The General Test." If your system is an AGI, or has AGI potential,
> then it must first of all have a skill and be able to solve problems in a
> g
On Feb 4, 2008 7:38 PM, Bob Mottram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well if you take something like the "talking heads" experiment
> (http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/cited2/steelsthetalkingheadsexperiment.html)
> and ask what it would take to scale this up to human-like language
> abilities inev
On Feb 4, 2008 12:12 PM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The robotics path to AI is a lot like the evolutionary path to natural
> intelligence...
>
> Create a system that learns to achieve simple sensorimotor goals in
> its environment...
> then move on to social goals... and language eve
On Feb 4, 2008 11:27 AM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
> > integral to mathematics.
>
> The counterargument is that no one has yet made an AI virtual chimp ...
> and nearly all of the human brain is the same as that o
I doubt that 3D object recognition is integral to 'genuine
intelligence'. Theoretically, if we had an AGI we should be able to
put it in a simulated 2D world and it would still act intelligently.
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics. If you th
10 matches
Mail list logo
