On 6/13/06, William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is not meant so much to replace our discussions on list but todisplay the various questions people have asked and the variousanswers to them in a persistant and easy to use fashion. Will
Well I'm not sure if this requires group effort. If so
ited out by a random user. It serves the purpose best, when the knowledge is already established.
SanjayOn 6/13/06, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Sanjay,On 6/12/06, William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 10/06/06, sanjay padmane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:&g
notification with a link, when someone replies
to a watched thread. But I doubt it can notify for all threads. May
need some custom programming.
Sanjay
On 6/10/06, Russell Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/10/06, sanjay padmane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel you should disco
I feel you should discontinue the list. That will force people to post there.
I'm not using the forum only because no one else is using it (or very
few), and everyone is perhaps doing the same.
Another advantage is that it will expose the discussions to google and
it will draw more people with in
On 5/30/06, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shane,I'm not a neuroscientist either, but I do know there is definitelyplenty of evidence about localization of specific types of memory inthe brain:Thats true (based on readings from the web). It seems that the storage starts right at sensors (t
On 5/30/06, Yan King Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We need to identify AGI bottlenecks and tackle them systematically.
Basically the AGI problem is to:
1. design a knowledge representation
2. design learning algorithms
3. fill the thing with knowledgeWhat do you expect it to do after that? Or
o did not fly in the face of
convention and did not need to endure the discouragement of mediocre
minds.
From: sanjay padmane
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:31
PMTo: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Logic and
Knowledge Representation
On 5/7/06, Gary
On 5/7/06, Pei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AIdoesn't necessarily follow the same path as how human intelligence isproduced, even though it is indeed the only path that has been provedto work so far.IMO, if a machine achieves true intelligence via a system that is entirely different from brain,
On 5/7/06, Gary Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My
opinion on the most probable route to a true AI Entity
is:
1. Build
a better fuzzy pattern representation language with an inference mechanism for
extracting inducible information from user inputs. Fuzziness allows
the
language to un
Who needs Qrio when we can have these - http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/06/0610_050610_robot.htmlSanjay
On 1/30/06, Sergio Navega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the epitome of the chicken and egg problem.Robotics researchers give up their projects becausethey don't know how to do c
Not exactly a case of self awareness, but its interesting, and a step in the right direction imo ...http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20051219/awarerobot_tec.html?source=rss
Sanjay
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbo
I guess their top most leader needs some general intelligence urgently and they are searching for it all over the Internet.;-)It doesn't look like they are spying or trying to identify 'over ambitious' people, they wouldn't do so openly. And they should know that someone interested in its misuse or
On 12/12/05, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Textured surfaces would massivelyincrease the number of polygons in the sim world which would increasethe processor load required for vision processing Of course, its not possible to model each and every tiny detail on a surface (eg, the roughnes
Hi...I agree that the models will be very "clean" compared to real things.I can't say whether it will be possible to add noise, but the agent will not only sense, it will also interact with these 3D models. We are making each object (including the house) in three levels of detail, which go from sim
Hi...I fully agree here, AGI can be very dangerous in wrong hands.But same is the case with any powerful tech. Controlling the knowledge is only a temporary measure. In fact, general wisdom says that limiting the knowledge to a chosen few can be more dangerous. Power corrupts easily. Its misuse can
15 matches
Mail list logo
