On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/02/2008, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This causes real controversy in this discussion list, which pressures me
to build my own AGI.
How about joining effort with one of the existing AGI projects?
They are
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/02/2008, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This causes real controversy in this discussion list, which pressures me
to build my own AGI.
How about joining effort with one of the existing AGI
On 27/02/2008, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This causes real controversy in this discussion list, which pressures me
to build my own AGI.
How about joining effort with one of the existing AGI projects?
--linas
---
agi
Archives:
Ben, thank you for clarifying.
Ben Goertzel wrote:
I like the marketing technique at this mailing list. AGI developers
are claiming that they are building AGI but they are just building
narrow programs.
Personally I am working on both -- the former for RD purposes and the
latter to
Nice article. It's a white knuckle ride towards the singularity from now
on!
On 14/04/07, Bruce Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The creation of a superhumanly intelligent AI system could be possible
within 10 years, with an AI Manhattan Project, says Ben Goertzel.
Published on
