Re: [agi] Computer monitoring and control API

2006-10-02 Thread Stephen Reed
Hi Andi, I too have thought about using the human/computer interface as sensors and actuators for an AI. This would accomplish a few things: 1. Grounding of symbols in a real world that is mostly symbolic and precise to begin with. 2. Behaviors and actions could be developed that are useful

Re: [agi] Computer monitoring and control API

2006-10-01 Thread Andrew Babian
I wrote: I just had a notion. The proper sensory input and motor output for an AI is the computer screen (and sound input and regular keyboard and mouse input). One thing that needs to exist is a freely available standard API for these things, so people can work on them, plus

[agi] Computer monitoring and control API

2006-09-29 Thread Andrew Babian
I just had a notion. The proper sensory input and motor output for an AI is the computer screen (and sound input and regular keyboard and mouse input). One thing that needs to exist is a freely available standard API for these things, so people can work on them, plus implementations for the

Re: [agi] Computer monitoring and control API

2006-09-29 Thread Richard Loosemore
Andrew Babian wrote: I just had a notion. The proper sensory input and motor output for an AI is the computer screen (and sound input and regular keyboard and mouse input). One thing that needs to exist is a freely available standard API for these things, so people can work on them, plus

Re: [agi] Computer monitoring and control API

2006-09-29 Thread Bob Mottram
I would dearly love to have some intercompatible standards for robotics interfaces. There have been a few attempts to define a standard in the past, but none of them have been very successful so far. A few years ago I remember there was something called the Robotics Engineering Task Force which