Richard,
>SSR [susaro.com] .. is .. building .. AGI ..
>trying to stay as close as possible to the
>design of the human cognitive system.
>SAFAIRE .. is .. an AGI system..
>scheduled for .. release in 2010
What senses (/input formats) do you plan to support in the first version?
Any public info a
> [susaro.com]
> "This development environment goes by the name of SAFAIRE (which stands
for 'Safe and Friendly AI Research Environment', and is > pronounced *
sapphire*)."
Interesting... Sapphire is the name of my project.
---
agi
Archives: http://www.lis
Jiri Jelinek wrote:
Richard,
SSR [susaro.com] .. is .. building .. AGI ..
trying to stay as close as possible to the
design of the human cognitive system.
SAFAIRE .. is .. an AGI system..
scheduled for .. release in 2010
Ah, many questions.
What senses (/input formats) do you plan to suppo
ay, April 11, 2008 7:02:38 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] SAFAIRE project
Jiri Jelinek wrote:
> Richard,
>
>> SSR [susaro.com] .. is .. building .. AGI ..
>> trying to stay as close as possible to the
>> design of the human cognitive system.
>> SAFAIRE .. is .. an AGI system.
Richard,
>>Any public info about the user interface?
>No, this is the part that will become public last of all.
Is it because the ideas keep evolving?
Or would it just reveal too much about your unique ideas = possibly
hurting your business if published in early stages of development?
.. or somet
Jiri Jelinek wrote:
Richard,
Any public info about the user interface?
No, this is the part that will become public last of all.
Is it because the ideas keep evolving?
Or would it just reveal too much about your unique ideas = possibly
hurting your business if published in early stages of de
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Reed
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] SAFAIRE project
> Although not entirely applicable to every AGI project, here are my reasons
for using the GPL. I am also strongly in favor of open access for AGI/AI
acade
Mark wrote:
I wonder if you could clarify why you insistupon GPL as opposed to a
Berkeley-type or Apache-type license? I believevery strongly that both
ends of the open source to commercial *spectrum*are entirely unreasonable
and that there is a reasonable middle ground wherewe
ou're so misguided that you're not
succeeding at being altruistic).
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Reed
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] SAFAIRE project
Mark wrote:
I wonder if you could clarify why you insist
