Here's the worst case scenario I see for ai: that there has to be
hardware complexity to the extent that generally nobody is going to be
able to get the initial push. Indeed, there's Moore's law to take
account of, but the economics might just prevent us from accumulating
enough nodes, enough
--- Bryan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the worst case scenario I see for ai: that there has to be
> hardware complexity to the extent that generally nobody is going to be
> able to get the initial push. Indeed, there's Moore's law to take
> account of, but the economics might just
On Monday 10 December 2007, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> The worst case scenario is that AI wipes out all life on earth, and
> then itself, although I believe at least the AI is likely to survive.
http://lifeboat.com/ex/ai.shield
Re: how much computing power is needed for ai. My worst-case scenario
acc
--- Bryan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> > The worst case scenario is that AI wipes out all life on earth, and
> > then itself, although I believe at least the AI is likely to survive.
>
> http://lifeboat.com/ex/ai.shield
SIAI has not yet so
On 11/12/2007, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://lifeboat.com/ex/ai.shield
That's quite amusing. Safeguarding humanity against dancing robots.
I don't believe that technology is something you can run away from, in
a space lifeboat or any other sort of refuge. You just have to t
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> --- Bryan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Re: how much computing power is needed for ai. My worst-case
> > scenario accounts for nearly any finite computing power, via the
> > production of semiconductant silicon wafer tech.
>
> A human brain
--- Bob Mottram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SIAI has not yet solved the friendliness problem.
>
> I've always had problems with the concept of "friendliness" spoken
> about by folks from SIAI. It seems like a very ill-defined concept.
> What does "friendly to humanity" really mean? It seems t
--- Bryan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> > --- Bryan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Re: how much computing power is needed for ai. My worst-case
> > > scenario accounts for nearly any finite computing power, via the
> > > production
