2008/5/28 Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sounds interesting. Can you give us a little more detail (or link). What
> kind of robot, where? Doing what? Watching what movie? And how does it dream
> - optimise/correct actions?
Link:
http://code.google.com/p/sentience/
A picture of the robot:
h
Bob: I'm doing stuff with robotics which is mostly about processing
sequences of images (I call the offline playbacks used for parameter
optimisation "dream sequences"), although probably what I'm doing
doesn't qualify as AGI in a strict sense - it's more reminiscent of
the Grand/Urban Challenge
2008/5/28 Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No one's yet actually trying to develop "movie AI/AGI" - an intelligence
> that can live in and/or respond to a continuous movie[s] of the world, are
> they? Ben's system, from the v. little I saw, gestures at this, but falls
> short.
I'm doing stuff
Steve/Stephen: I am planning to archive all conversations .This is pretty
simple with text, but when things move into real-time moving images from which
to understand the world, this takes a little more storage.
No one's yet actually trying to develop "movie AI/AGI" - an intelligence that
c
ue you raise.
>
No, it makes things WORSE by factionalizing rather than drilling down to the
underlying false assumptions. This is how wars are needlessly made.
Again, I am amazed by my apparent TOTAL failure to communicate. Can someone
here please debug this?
Steve Richfield
//texai.org
3008 Oak Crest Ave.
Austin, Texas, USA 78704
512.791.7860
- Original Message
From: Steve Richfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:23:37 PM
Subject: Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
Steve,
gt;
> To: agi@v2.listbox.com
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 2:28:32 PM
> Subject: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
>
> 2008/5/26 Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Regarding the best language for AGI development, most here know that I'm
> > using J
Hi Stephen,
>
> I observe that you are building a sandbox. Will it be open source?
>
Yep, eventually it will be open source. Although sandbox gives the
wrong impression. I want most of the code for the computer system (AI
or otherwise) to be running inside it so it can self manage it in the
lon
Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 5:39:40 PM
Subject: Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a good use case for a resource-control agent th
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a good use case for a resource-control agent that watches over
> memory utilization in its JVM. Likewise it points out the need for a higher
> level process to ask each to-be-launched skill-performance what its res
: William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 2:28:32 PM
Subject: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
2008/5/26 Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Regarding the best language for AGI development, most here know that I'm
> us
2008/5/26 Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Regarding the best language for AGI development, most here know that I'm
> using Java in Texai. For skill acquisition, my strategy is to have Texai
> acquire a skill by composing a Java program to perform the learned skill.
How will it memory manage b
12 matches
Mail list logo
