Charles wrote:
> Anyone want to take over Notary now that it's been caught up?
>
>
> Sure.
I nominate Charles for Notary.
I RBoA-deposit a 7 crop.
I PBA-deposit a 7 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 3 crop.
{
I create the following crops in woggle's possession: 7, 3, 4, 7, 5, 2, 1, 1
}
Reason: Harvested amended rule 106
{
I create the following crops in woggle's possession: X, 4, 7, 9, X
}
Reason: Harvested amended rule 911
{
I create the following crops in Taral's possession: 1, 9, 9, 6, 4, 6, 4, 0
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 20:20, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PF
>
>> = Criminal Case 2295 =
>>
>>BobTHJ failed to assign prerogatives for December in a timely
>>fashion before the beginning of the month, as required by Rule
>>20
I harvest 2307 (CFJ number) for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 2308 (CFJ number) for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 6011 (proposal number) for 4 points.
I harvest 6012 (proposal number) for 4 points.
I harvest 6013 (proposal number) for 4 points.
I harvest 6017 (proposal number) for 4 points.
I harvest 106 (amended rule n
I intend, without 3 objections, to amend the AAA contract by inserting
this text after the first sentence of section 16:
If the Federal Subsidy is ever less than 3, it is set to 3.
Wooble wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I recuse myself from all possible cases, go on hold, and suggest that
>> a Historian election be held.
>
> I nominate Murphy as Historian.
I accept.
Anyone want to take over Notary now that it's been caught
I mill 4 + 9 = 2.
I mill 3 + 7 = X.
I mill 4 + 9 = 2.
I mill 8 - 9 = X.
I mill 3 * 7 = X.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
PF
-- Forwarded message --
From: Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2295 assigned to Taral
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I harvest 106 (the number of a recently amended power-3 rule) for 8
> random crops.
> I harvest 911 (the number of a recently amended power-1.7 rule) for 5
> random crops.
Me too!
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let
I vote:
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6014 O 1 1.7 Goethe Re-streamline Appeals
>
FOR
> 6015 D 1 2.0 WarrigalMake notes not annoying
>
AGAINST
> 6016 D 1 3.0 OscarMeyr Order of the Hero
>
FOR
> 6017 D 1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 21
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recuse myself from all possible cases, go on hold, and suggest that
> a Historian election be held.
I nominate Murphy as Historian.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recuse myself from all possible cases, go on hold, and suggest that
> a Historian election be held.
Proposal: The AWJ's enough
{
Repeal Rule 2220 (Agoran History).
}
I recuse myself from all possible cases, go on hold, and suggest that
a Historian election be held.
--Warrigal
2285-86: TRUE
R1023(b)(1) does not specify any particular form of enumeration, and
the forms here are both enumerated in the ordinary-language sense.
2300: FALSE
Since the PNP is not first-class, R2170's "the first-class person
who ... most directly and immediately causes it to be sent" standa
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2304
>
> == CFJ 2304 ==
>
>It is a thing.
UNDETERMINED; "it" has no referent.
I PBA-deposit an X crop.
I PBA-deposit an X crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 0 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 2 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 2 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 4 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 4 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 4 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 7 crop.
I PBA-withdraw an 8 crop.
I PBA-withdraw an 8 crop.
I PBA-withdraw an
The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for ^8.
The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for ^9.
Using a Addition Mill, the PNP mills 4 + 4 = 8.
The PNP deposits one 8 crop into the PBA to gain ^26.
The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for ^10.
The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> == CFJ 2299 ==
>
>Pavitra has won on or about December 3rd, 2008.
As no arguments have been given, I recuse myself from this case.
--Warrigal
I recuse comex from CFJ 2260.
I recuse root from CFJs 2285-86 and 2294.
I inform the PerlNomic Partnership of the following criminal cases
against it, and invite it to rebut the argument for its guilt. (I
don't think it's capable of sending arbitrary messages in a timely
fashion, so I also unofficially invite its partners to so rebut.)
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cot
On 10 Dec 2008, at 20:37, Ed Murphy wrote:
Rule 2124 doesn't explicitly state that the objection must be posted
after the announcement of intent.
I object to all future dependent actions.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:16, The PerlNomic Partnership
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6014 O 1 1.7 Goethe Re-streamline Appeals
SELL(2VP - FOR)
> 6015 D 1 2.0 WarrigalMake notes not annoying
SELL(1VP - AGAINST) - This should have add
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 18:57, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Defendant BobTHJ pleaded guilty, I trivially find em GUILTY.
>
> Not publishing a weekly report of information that can change weekly is a
> serious offense. On the other manipulatory appendage, vacation is a time to
>
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6014 O 1 1.7 Goethe Re-streamline Appeals
> 6015 D 1 2.0 WarrigalMake notes not annoying
> 6016 D 1 3.0 OscarMeyr Order of the Hero
> 6017 D 1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 2140
TTttPF, I vote SELL(2VP) on all o
On 10 Dec 2008, at 17:16, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
6017 D 1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 2140
Incidentally, I loop a cfj against the PNP for violating rule 1607 by
distributing a retracted proposal.
On 10 Dec 2008, at 17:15, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, with the support of 2 of {BobTHJ, root, Murphy} to cause the
panel to judge AFFIRM, accepting the trial judge's arguments as a good
faith attempt to resolve the case.
good faith attempt does not apply an appropriate judgment.
On 10 Dec 2008, at 17:16, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
6017 D 1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 2140
CoE: This proposal was retracted.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 6014 O 1 1.7 Goethe Re-streamline Appeals
AGAINST * 5
> 6015 D 1 2.0 WarrigalMake notes not annoying
AGAINST
> 6016 D 1 3.0 OscarMeyr Order of the Hero
FOR
> 6017 D 1 3.0 E
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2282a
>
> Appeal 2282a
I intend, with the support of 2 of {BobTHJ, root, Murphy} to cause the
panel to judge
On 10 Dec 2008, at 15:40, Elliott Hird wrote:
I object to both of these.
Oh, and I CoE the most recently published FLR and SLR as they are
incorrect.
On 10 Dec 2008, at 15:38, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most-recently published
version of the Short Logical Ruleset, with a scope of the text of each
rule.
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most-recently published
version of the Full Logical Ruleset,
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most-recently published
version of the Short Logical Ruleset, with a scope of the text of each
rule.
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most-recently published
version of the Full Logical Ruleset, with a scope of the text of each
rule.
I submit the following AI-2, II-0 proposal entitled "Trapping":
{
Amend the Best Mousetrap Yet contract by appending the sentence "Any
person CAN cause Warrigal to deregister emself by announcement."
}
I PBA-withdraw 4 VP
I RBoA-deposit 4 VP
I RBoA-withdraw 3 9 Crops
I PBA-deposit 3 9 Crops
Wow, the bank rates are almost rational...
--
Elysion
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following pledge
>
> {This is a pledge, and a public contract, called "Redefined Zooping".
> To zoop a criminal CFJ means to intend to initiate it with 2 support,
> acting on behalf on anyone the person zooping can a
Heck, how about this:
"This is a public contract and a pledge known as The Best Mousetrap
Yet. Parties to this contract are known as Best Mice Yet. This
contract is also the rules to a game known as Bolero III; playing
Bolero III therefore indicates that one agrees to this contract.
Warrigal CAN a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You quoted it yourself:
> "The PerlNomic Partnership shall act by using the
> mechanisms of the PerlNomic game to send messages to the appropriate
> Agoran fora. This is the only mechanism by which the PerlNomic
> Partner
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:28:31 +
Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 13:19, Joshua Boehme wrote:
>
> > I submit the following proposal.
>
> You know, the appeals processes aren't done.
>
> I'll return it if the scam is judged to have worked myself,
> and if it didn't,
I harvest 2298, a recently assigned CFJ number, for 2 WRVs.
--
Elysion
I submit the following proposal.
Proposal: Resurrect Rule 2140 (AI=3)
Create a rule entitled "Power Controls Mutability" with Power 3 reading as
follows:
No entity with power below the power of this rule can
(a) cause an entity to have power greater than its own.
(b) adjus
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:02:34 -0800
The PerlNomic Partnership <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This distribution of proposals 6004-6009 initiates the Agoran
> Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible voters for ordinary
> proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
> p
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal has repeatedly shown knowledge that the PerlNomic metarules
> include a provision that by playing the game one agrees to be bound by
> the PNP contract, and with this foreknowledge e registered as a
> PerlNomic pl
43 matches
Mail list logo
