On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to make Normish Partnership 2 inactive.
>
> -Yally
I object.
--Warrigal--er, Thomas O'Malley
I intend, without objection, to make Normish Partnership 2 inactive.
-Yally
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Without objection, I intend to make Sgeo inactive.
I object.
This message serves to make votes on behalf of the PerlNomic
Partnership (a public contract).
The PerlNomic Partnership votes as follows. Each vote is made a
number of times equal to the maximum number of valid votes that
the PerlNomic Partnership can make on an ordinary decision on each
ordinary
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro's caste flips on or about Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:08:13 -0600
> were illegal.
I judge TRUE. I accept caller's argument that the holder of the Grand
Poobah office is only obligated, and thus only allowed, to correct
changes e made emself.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Taral wrote:
> I contest these CoEs.
You can't, but the CoEs don't have any legal force as a distribution
of proposals is not self-ratifying.
