On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013, omd wrote:
>> I submit a promise with title "???", text "???", and conditions for
>> author destruction "true", transfer it to myself, and cash it.
>
> Fails because:
>If a promise is possessed by the Tree, any play
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, omd wrote:
> I create (not submit) a promise with title "!!!", text "!!!" and
> conditions for author destruction "I CANNOT destroy this promise".
>
> I intend, with notice, to destroy "!!!".
>
> I CFJ on: "I CAN destroy '!!!' with notice."
>
> Arguments: This is j
I submit a promise with title "???", text "???", and conditions for
author destruction "true", transfer it to myself, and cash it.
I intend, with notice, to destroy "???".
I CFJ on: "I CAN destroy '???' with notice."
Arguments:
There is nothing out of the ordinary about this promise, but consid
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:46 PM, omd wrote:
>> 7439 1 woggle he -> e
> AGAINST per my comments about rewards
>> 7440 1 woggle When ., -> When ,
> AGAINST
I change my vote on both of these to FOR per woggle's promise. :)
On May 20, 2013 5:46 PM, "omd" wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:40 PM, omd wrote:
> > 7442 1 scshunt No Recordkeeping Burden
>
> CORRECTION: This proposal does not exist, as scshunt withdrew it and
> purported to resubmit it after inserting "'Enact a Rule with the
> text:', or other wo
On 5/19/13 14:24 , com...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW, although I prefer not to have disinterested proposals (because when we
> had them players seemed to more often mark good proposals as disinterested
> than the other way around, and even simple proposals stimulate the game), I
> do think these sh
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:40 PM, omd wrote:
> 7437 1 Roujo(untitled)
FOR, although I would prefer "Ended"
> 7438 2 ais523 Fix adoption index tracking
AGAINST
> 7439 1 woggle he -> e
AGAINST per my comments about rewards
> 7440 1 woggle When ., -> When ,
AGAINST
>
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Wes Contreras wrote:
> We submit a judgment of GUILTY, with a sentence of APOLOGY, giving a
> set of prescribed words including {ribbon, chartreuse, obfuscate,
> mortgage, macdonald}. We presume that the amusement value of such an
> apology will easily exceed any inconvenien
[Proto comes to mind with anniversary coming up, and also
the Lime ribbon working imperfectly/uninterestinly]
Amend Rule 2387 (Ribbons) by replacing:
(+L) If a proposal is adopted, and if only one Player
other that the proposal's author cast (and did not
retract) one
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:31 PM, omd wrote:
> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
>
> 7426 1 omd, etc. Non-reporting Office
>
AGAINST
> 7427 1 omd, etc. Dishonor Rolls
>
AGAINST
> 7428 1 omd, etc. Agoran arms in a rule
>
AGAINST per Wes
> 7429 1 omd, etc. Protection Racket
>
AGAINST. I
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM, omd wrote:
> Pool report: The Proposal Pool is empty.
>
> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
>
> 7435 2 scshunt Numericity
> 7436 3 scshunt De-persist commitments
I spend 2 VCs to increase my voting limit by 1; FOR both.
-scshunt
I cast one vote AGAINST, and the remainder of my votes FOR,
every decision to adopt a proposal currently in its voting
period. -G.
I submit a proposal, titled "Promises do an acceptable job of handling this,
but a specialized mechanism would probably be more convenient and less
error-prone":
Create a rule, titled "Trade Offers":
A person (the Seller) CAN create a Trade Offer by announcement,
specifying a set of
We create a Black Ribbon in our possession, having earned it by
assigning a Judgment in CFJ 3319.
--Wes
14 matches
Mail list logo
