G. wrote:
> I think Jason's qualification on the extraneous CAN gets it right:
>
> > though this could be interpreted as making
> > a document purporting to be a Notice of Honour an actual, official
> > Notice of Honour. I do not rule on this matter here, this is simply on
> > observation.
>
> This
> === CFJ 3809 ===
>
> CuddleBeam bid in an auction in the quoted message.
>
> ==
CFJ 3809 Judgement
The judgements of 3793 and 3817, taken together, have found
> === CFJ 3817 ===
>
> Falsifian initiated a zombie auction this month.
>
> ==
CFJ 3817 Judgement
The authorizing text for zombie auctions is in R1885/9 (Power=2
On 2/19/20 10:20 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3810. I assign it to Jason.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3810
>
> === CFJ 3810 ===
>
> It is generally POSSIBLE to act on b
I intend to clean, as stated by r2221, the rule pertaining to
regulations (2493), replacing every instance of "an" with "a" (as every
instance of it is incorrect), if there is no objection.
(I don't think this requires a proposal, right?)
I vote as follows:
El 26/02/2020 a las 8:20, Aris Merchant via agora-official escribió:
8342j Gaelan, [1] 2.0 Calls with Memoranda
For
8343j twg 1.7 Judicial Jocularity Act
Against.
8344* Alexis 3.0 Unsubstantive interpreta
I vote as follows, and act on behalf of o to vote as follows:
> 8342j Gaelan, [1] 2.0 Calls with Memoranda
AGAINST. These should not become part of precedent but should change/be
removed with a change in officer, OR make it clear that an administrative
opinion is only a part of
I vote FOR all because they seem cool.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:20 AM Aris Merchant via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this d
