I submit the following Diplonomic proposal, "Proposal Timing":
Amend Rule 8 by replacing:
"When a Proposal has received a number of non-withdrawn votes in favor greater
than half the number of Contestants, the Judge SHALL, in a timely fashion,
and CAN enact the proposal by publishing the new text
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:16 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal. For N from 2 to 5, I intend with N support
> to cause the following proposal to become pending.
With 2 support, I do so.
-Aris
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 1:59 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-official wrote:
>
> In the past day, a few proposals have passsed:
>
> "Order Clarification" by ATMunn (4 FOR — 0 AGAINST)
> {
> Amend Diplonomic Rule 17 to read in full:
>
> 17. There are four possible orders: Hold, Move, S
I submit the following as a Diplonomic Proposal:
{
If the previous Diplonomic Proposal submitted by ATMunn has not passed,
then amend Diplonomic Rule 17 by replacing the last sentence with the
following paragraph:
{
A Convoy order orders a fleet in a water province to move an army from
one c
I submit the following proposal, paying a Pendant to cause it to become
sponsored:
Title: Contract charities
Co-authors: G., Falsifian, P.S.S.
AI: 1
Text:
{
[Comment: The original version was by G., then resubmitted by Falsifian,
then again by me. :) P.S.S. also suggested a minor change, so I in
On 7/10/2020 6:55 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:35 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-business wrote:
On 7/10/20 1:15 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
These proposals were pended using pendants. However, because the rules
at the time did no
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:35 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-business wrote:
> On 7/10/20 1:15 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> > These proposals were pended using pendants. However, because the rules
> > at the time did not render them sponsored, they did not become so.
On 7/10/20 1:15 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> These proposals were pended using pendants. However, because the rules
> at the time did not render them sponsored, they did not become so. It is,
> in my opinion, an error that they were not rendered sponsored retroactively;
> as Promot