I demonstrate the following Rulebending Form:
-
The five Eastman weeks of each month are hereby named:
Chaos, Discord, Confusion, Bureaucracy, and The Aftermath.
-
On this, the 6th day of Discord in August
Year of Our Lady of Discord 3186
On 2020-08-09 18:21, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
PROPOSAL 8482 (Offices are complex v2)
AUTHOR: Trigon
CLASS: ORDINARY
CHAMBER: EFFICIENCY
SPONSORED: YES
FOR (9): Aris, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian%, Gaelan@, Jason*, Murphy%, Publius
Scribonius Scholasticus, Trigon, nix%
AGAINST (0):
PRESENT
I vote as follows:
On 2020-08-10 23:30, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
ID Author(s)AITitle
---
8488*^ Falsifian, Jason, omd3.0 Empty the escalator v1
FOR
8489e^ Jason, Trigon
On 8/13/20 8:55 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
> Having been authorized by Rule 2629/0, I, Trigon, Treasuror of Agora
> Nomic, hereby initiate an auction.
>
> Whereas the Lost and Found Department owns no cards or products, the
> lots of this auction are as follows: (1) a new Victory
I bid 77 coins.
Gaelan
> On Aug 13, 2020, at 5:55 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-official
> wrote:
>
> Having been authorized by Rule 2629/0, I, Trigon, Treasuror of Agora Nomic,
> hereby initiate an auction.
>
> Whereas the Lost and Found Department owns no cards or products, the lots of
> th
Oh, okay, I think that's substantially different enough to require a new
intent, so I intend, with Agoran Consent, to award the Badge of
Diplonomic to ATMunn, G., Jason, Aris, Falsifian, R. Lee, omd, Trigon,
Ben & Claire of BC System, and P.S.S..
Thank you for getting their perspective, so that w
On 2020-08-09 20:02, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
FORBES FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY-SIX
or
TREASUROR'S W
On 2020-08-13 17:44, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
FORBES FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY-FIVE
or
TREASUROR'S MI
On 2020-08-07 01:45, Falsifian wrote:
I pay a fee of 47 Legislative Credits to Dragon QuickExchange to
recieve one Pendant.
I believe Dragon QuickExchange currently owns:
* Two Victory Points
* Two Blot-B-Gones
* Five Pendants
* One Extra Vote
I intend without objection to ratify the followin
On 2020-08-14 03:09, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
On 2020-08-07 01:45, Falsifian wrote:
I pay a fee of 47 Legislative Credits to Dragon QuickExchange to
recieve one Pendant.
I believe Dragon QuickExchange currently owns:
* Two Victory Points
* Two Blot-B-Gones
* Five Pendants
* One Ext
I create and become a party the following contact, titled "Somewhat Annoying
Experiment": {
The Eligible Revocation can be calculated as follows:
Let x be the lowest integer that, represented as a decimal number in ASCII, has
the SHA256 hash
9b722e5d98390e12c7f29dc74d30a52f2c152a35fd47f9614e35f2
I agree to the following contract (delimited by {...}).
The Weekly Assignment is currently owned by the contract (since the
owner is not otherwise determined).
I submit the following contract summary:
"Coordinates Agoran journalism and payment for same. If you want to
report on the current week
The Editor is the recordkeepor for Credits. The player Assigned to the
previous week is the recordkeepor for Credits, or Falsifian if nobody is
Assigned.
This is my weekly report as Editor of the Agoran Press contract.
No Credits exist.
--
Falsifian
Title: Agoran Press
{
Purpose: support the documentation of Agoran events in a way that
informs current players and non-players and also supports future
research.
Whereas the Agoran Press rewards its members only for the honourable
work of Reporting, which is surely for the better of our goo
I am interested in becoming a judge.
(I vaguely remember something about announcements in subjects not
counting, so I repeated in the body just in case)
Argument for FALSE:
Rule 1742 says that
"The portion of a contract's provisions that can be interpreted with
reference only to information that is either publicly or generally
available are known as its body; the remainder of the provisions are
known as the annex."
and
"A party to a contract
> On Aug 13, 2020, at 10:36 PM, Byron Krane via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Gratuitous arguments: There is probably no lowest integer with this
> property, because integers include negative numbers.
Ah, yep, duh, so my revocation definitely failed.
I consent to, and do, amend the contract
17 matches
Mail list logo
