On 8 August 2013 06:53, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the degree to award to
ais523 for eir thesis Judge's Arguments and Evidence on CFJ 3381.
The eligible voters for this decision are the active players. Each
player's voting limit
On 5 August 2013 21:06, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I intend, with two support, to appeal on principle.
I support.
On 3 August 2013 02:32, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement using the mechanism
in rule 911.
I support.
On 1 August 2013 18:34, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7568 30 O omd, etc. Agora pulls a B + some ratifications
I vote FOR*1 proposal 7568.
I vote for ME.
I nominate myself, with a salary of Graham's number G Yaks.
I vote for omd in the general election.
On 4 July 2013 01:39, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with two Independent Support, to form the Inflationary Party with
the following Constitution:
I object.
Ditto. Happy birthday, Agora.
On 24 June 2013 12:58, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Arguments: I would say any number of wrappers would work.
I define f(n) to be I attempt to announce {{{, followed by f(n+1),
followed by }}}, whenever n ω, and f(ω) to be I call a CFJ on the
statement 'This is not a CFJ.', and then announce
I am tired, and I object to my being made inactive, and I vote PRESENT
on everything I can, and I register for Agora XX, and the first two
actions I do only in Agora, whilst the latter I do only in Agora XX,
my observation of tiredness not being counted as an action, have a
nice day.
On 7 May 2013 03:15, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7418 2 omd Higher order
PRESENT
7419 3 omd Clear the books
AGAINST
7420 3 omd We don't need to be that idiosyncratic un-derp
.. version
AGAINST
7421 3 G.What you WILL
I object, because AGAINT should never, by definition, be precisely defined.
On 10 April 2013 20:45, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
IDAI CHAMBER AUTHOR TITLE
7364 1.0 Ordinary G. Ribbon Evolution
7365 1.0 Ordinary RoujoMarket Failure
7366 1.0 Ordinary RoujoCascading Market Failure
7367 3.0 Ordinary scshunt
On 1 April 2013 19:14, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
WHEREAS, the Rule Richard Potato Boat continues to exist and this makes me
nervous, I intend to declare a Gerontocracy with 3 Elder support. -G.
I don't know, can I support this? If I can I so do.
On 11 March 2013 18:52, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Date of this report: ...
CoE: The date of the quoted report is not
I register. I become active.
On 28 January 2013 17:53, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
IDAI CHAMBER AUTHOR TITLE
7337 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Give those back
PRESENT
7338 3.0 Ordinary ais523 cleanup
AGAINST
7339 3.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Lesser cleanup
On 5 November 2012 03:17, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:31 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, with no hard feelings, I intend, with two support, to appeal
this judgement. ;p
I support and stuff am I even a player
I transfer all my elliott cards to omd.
On 21 September 2012 01:09, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
7310 1.0 Plutocratic scshunt Richard Potato Boat
FOR
Correction: I spend a ruble to increase my voting limit on proposal
7310 by one, and vote FOR it.
I submit (create transfer to the Tree) 25 copies of the following promise:
ZipZop Series G-002
Text: I object to any/all recently-posted intents to make a proposal
Democratic.
On 19 September 2012 16:32, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with 3 Agoran Consent, to set the Chamber of this proposal
to Democratic.
I object.
On 19 September 2012 18:03, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
NUM AI CHAMBER AUTHOR TITLE
7309 3.0 Ordinary scshunt Conditional Destruction
PRESENT
7310 1.0 Plutocratic scshunt Richard Potato Boat
FOR
7311 2.0 Ordinary Murphy Ink rationing
FOR
On 20 September 2012 17:05, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to, with 3 Agoran consent, flip the chamber of this decision
to Democratic.
I object.
endorse scshunt
On 28 August 2012 13:15, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
For each of players named above, I intend, without objection, to deregister.
I object.
I endorse G. in the Justiciar election.
On 16 July 2012 02:22, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
7267 1 G. Still Crazy after all these Years
AGAINST
7268 3 G. allow secret votes
FOR
7269 2 FKA441344 not funny anymore
PRESENT
Ｉ ｖｏｔｅ ｆｏｒ ｓｃｓｈｕｎｔ．
On 10 July 2012 14:26, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ｉ ｖｏｔｅ ｆｏｒ ｓｃｓｈｕｎｔ．
Fine, I'll do it.
CFJ: I have cast a vote in the current Promotor election.
Arguments: I've honestly forgotten our precedent on this.
On 29 June 2012 23:36, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
AGAINST
7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
AGAINST
7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
AGAINST
7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
FOR
7255 2 441344 ANTI-SIEGE Mk II
On 21 June 2012 20:35, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 21 June 2012 20:29, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I support G.'s move to motion to reconsider CFJ 3214.
I support.
Oops; TTTPF.
I evoke the power of UNDEAD. I corrupt the bone stack. I reify the
transverse contractual chronoporting system. I command the horde to
send an identifying message to a public forum. I win the game. I say I
do, therefore I do.
On 20 June 2012 15:41, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I evoke the power of UNDEAD. I corrupt the bone stack. I reify the
transverse contractual chronoporting system. I command the horde to
send an identifying message to a public forum. I win the game. I say I
do, therefore
On 19 June 2012 03:07, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran consent, to flip the Speed to Normal.
I support.
On 5 June 2012 12:16, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to, Without Objection, destroy the Promise titled (2011-04-25
ehird).
Without Objection I do so.
I didn't notice this intent buried in all the others, but I don't see
why (harmless) currency needs to be destroyed like this.
I
On 4 June 2012 03:01, com...@gmail.com wrote:
I do what he just did.
CFJ: As [whatever Tanner's name is this month] didn't actually do
anything, this is ineffective.
Evidence: The following email sent by omd:
{{{
I do what he just did.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2012, at 4:20 PM,
On 29 May 2012 17:45, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Why?
In reaction to the allegation of scammitude, presumably.
I vote AGAINST on all proposals with even numbers and FOR all
proposals with odd numbers, then retract all those votes and vote
PRESENT on every proposal.
On 28 May 2012 03:40, Schrodinger's Cat ag...@lesidhetree.com wrote:
scat ag...@lesidhetree.coms *2 7 Aug 11
CoE: This email is incorrect. (Just making sure it doesn't self-ratify.)
I vote FOR all proposals I can vote for.
I vote to endorse omd.
I nominate omd for every office.
I register. If I'm a player, I vote on these:
On 9 April 2012 01:43, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7201 3 G. Untitled
PRESENT
7202 2 Murphy, etc. Effective ballot fees
FOR
7203 2 Murphy Vote early and often
FOR
7204 1 omd Golem fix
FOR
7205 1 omd
On 25 March 2012 21:49, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
CFJ: kcnomic is a player.
CFJ: kcnomic is mister snuggles.
Arguments: I'm trying to destroy Agora by systematically clogging the
courts with nonsense CFJs.
Evidence: This message.
On 14 March 2012 07:23, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CoE: You deregistered on or about Tue 28 Feb 17:39:40 UTC, so Rule
869's 30-day limit hasn't expired yet.
Admitted. Also, CoE: I am not bayes.
On 14 March 2012 08:16, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
CFJ: I am Mr. Snuggles.
CFJ: I am Spartacus.
I register.
--
bayes 2012-03-21 02:22:50 +
On 5 March 2012 01:03, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
I cause Mr. Incredible to change his name to '. I cause ' to deregister.
CFJ: omd is a player.
Arguments: If FKA's interpretation of omd's message is correct, then
Mr. Incredible's name was changed to what it was for the purposes of
omd
On 28 February 2012 01:54, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I intend to request reconsideration with 2 support. implicitly caused
it to explicitly is as much doublespeak nonsense as war means peace.
-G.
ok done
Me too.
Why are we deregistering?
On 28 February 2012 00:01, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
Fri 17 Feb 03:33 Mr. Incredible changes eir name to '. I cause'.
Fri 17 Feb 03:33 '. I cause' deregisters.
CoE: I believe its name was in fact a single quote mark; it's the only
reasonable interpretation of omd's message. (My
On 26 February 2012 19:23, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone wanna support this? Regardless of what you think about the
scam, the judgement is flawed.
sure ok whatevs alright done
On 17 February 2012 03:20, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I announce that I want to deregister.
CFJ: comex is a player.
CFJ: comex would be a player if the quoted statement were sent to
agora-business.
On 7 February 2012 17:21, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Having received support from Yally and ehird, I request reconsideration
for CFJs 3140 and 3141.
CFJ: I supported the intents to reconsider CFJs 3140 and 3141.
Evidence: The message Murphy quoted, containing two U+3003 DITTO MARK
I taunt the police specifying the highest valid taunting number and
don't even know what this does.
On 30 January 2012 03:15, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
With Agoran Consent, I intend to register the OmNom Constitution.
I object.
I vote G. for Herald.
I vote Murphy for IADoP.
I vote Yally for Registrar if Yally reports, else Murphy.
On 24 January 2012 09:30, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Oh, I vote PRESENT on absolutely everything. Including elections.
ditto
On 24 January 2012 21:33, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
7154 2 441344 fix to 1023
PRESENT
7155 3 441344 The Person Agora, The Misguiding Therof, And
Eir Security
AGAINST
7156 3 441344 Clarify/Explicate Agoran Consent
FOR
On 13 January 2012 20:07, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
I declare intent to, with Agoran Consent, cause the President to taunt
the police specifying 6.
I supplant.
On 3 January 2012 00:15, David Jackman davidcjack...@gmail.com wrote:
I object.
You leave me with no choice!
CFJ: {David Jackman is a player.}
Arguments: R101.
Evidence: R101.
On 7 December 2011 01:08, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Support. omd's text within quotes differs from the statement by a
period and an instance of whitespace, but is nevertheless reasonably
close, whereas no other well-formed statement or yes/no question is.
I support.
On 7 December 2011 19:55, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I support.
Uh, and do so. I forgot that newfangled mechanism.
On 8 December 2011 00:04, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I support and do so.
Erm, I just support instead. I'm not two people. (Mister Snuggles supports.)
On 6 December 2011 08:54, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Do or did I register. ?
CoE: That is not the text of the CFJ. (Sure, whitespace is usually
treated as equivalent, but it's almost the entire point here.)
Do or did
I register.
? (CFJ.)
On 25 October 2011 18:25, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
(2011-04-25 ehird) [has served its purpose]
I object. I still need to make ais give me something for that one.
CoV: this ain't yer first post
I deregister.
On 28 September 2011 12:59, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
For each player other than me, I intend, without objection, to make
that player inactive.
I support.
With 3 Agoran Consent, I intend to try to take over the game, and
enact a new trophy rule detailing how awesome the
On 11 August 2011 18:25, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip the Speed to Normal.
I support.
On 8 August 2011 17:08, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to file a Motion to Reconsider for CFJs 3040
and 3041. Arguments: in my mind, brute-forcing a SHA-512 hash of any
size is an unreasonable effort to undertake in order to understand a
message. The
On 6 August 2011 18:34, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 6 August 2011 11:36, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I decline these nominations. For both of the Promotor and Rulekeepor
elections, I nominate the following players, who are active and hold
On 30 July 2011 23:21, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to deregister.
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to withdraw all
previous support or objection to this intent, and to then support it.
I intend, with Agoran Consent,
On 6 July 2011 00:48, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I support.
ttpf
Happy birthday Agora
I reward myself a magenta ribbon
Am I doing it right
On 16 June 2011 21:31, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote for myself.
I vote for omd.
On 21 June 2011 23:21, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Gratuitous arguments: Perl is moderately liberal with boolean
evaluation, treating (for example) the string '0' as false. It's
possible that AGAINST (or perhaps PRESENT) might evaluate to false.
Arguments: We have precedent
On 18 June 2011 05:22, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
I object.
I intend, without objection, to deregister Sgeo.
You are inactive and raising the quorum.
On 16 June 2011 18:33, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this case due to the possible
conflict of interest.
I support, and submit the following arguments:
Have you considered the reading that I immediately assumed, i.e.
I nominate myself
On 3 June 2011 01:05, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I change my vote on 7070 to AGAINST.
Ditto.
On 4 June 2011 05:07, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7074 2 Walker Spending Points v2
AGAINT
7075 3 scshunt Proposals Are Atomic
AGAINT
7076 1 omd No harm in knowing there's a betting market
AGAINT
means FOR
On 4 June 2011 05:23, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7077 3 omd Fix fixed flexibility
AGAINT
7078 1.7 omd 7050 fixes
AGAINT
7079 3 scshunt New Name V2
AGAINT
7080 1 scshunt VC
AGAINT
means FOR
On 4 June 2011 06:10, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Not infinitely divisible; not sure about quantity of coins. Not yet sure how
to handle players coming in and out - thoughts?
As another take, the number of coins could be directly tied to the
number of players; if a player
On 2 June 2011 06:16, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Does it really (asks the Assessor, expecting the unexpected)?
I vote AGAINT proposal 7068.
god why so many proposals
in following FORA is a synonym for FOR unless ais or Murphy votes
AGAINST in which case AGAINST; if one votes FOR and one votes AGAINST,
then PRESENT instead
On 31 May 2011 23:46, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7046 1 Walker, etc. The Machine
AGAINST because
On 19 May 2011 05:18, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with two support, to make this case Notable.
I support.
On 18 May 2011 02:53, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
7053 2 omd Encourage controversial proposals
FOR
7054 2 Walker Point Speaker
AGAINST
7055 2 scshunt Quickly, now
AGAINST
7056 2 Tanner L. Swett Speed notation
PRESENT
On 15 May 2011 05:46, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I accuse G. of lying per CFJ 2070.
I
ÆÞE®ðßŋþŊ’ÞÞºłě©æėæłe\-
On 13 May 2011 20:33, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to become a player.
Nice try.
But you can't fool me; I vote AGAINST.
On 25 April 2011 22:24, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I create a Promise: I become inactive.
I unofficially offer to trade this Promise for a similar one owned by
someone else.
I create a Promise with the condition {a Promise whose author is
ais523 with the text I become inactive is in
I create a Promise with the same text as the public message I
originally wrote this sentence in, and transfer it to whoever cashed
this Promise, or if that is meaningless, the Tree.
On 26 April 2011 03:35, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I intend, with two support, to file a Motion to Reconsider this because the
lack of an FLR published on that date makes the claim vacuously true, not
false.
Um, no.
Um, yes? All
On 24 April 2011 18:42, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
7025 2 Murphy Disinterested proposals
PRESENT. I think authors deserve compensation for fixes, but I realise
that grudges and competition can prevent legitimate fixes from
passing.
7027 3 omd
On 24 April 2011 04:30, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
7021 1 Walker Intention
FOR
7022 1.7 Walker, etc. Not worth the paper it's not printed on
AGAINST; the Rulekeepor is Wise, and should be allowed some discretion.
7023 3 omd Flexibility
On 25 April 2011 04:05, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I intend, without two objections or with Agoran Consent, to set the Weekly
Salary of the Assessor to 12.
I object.
On 25 April 2011 05:08, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I object.
On second thoughts I retract my objection. Did that stop being a thing
that is possible?
On 19 April 2011 01:08, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
7016 1.5 omd Patent Title
FOR
7017 3 Murphy Just in case
FOR if Murphy replies to this message confirming that the amount of
zeroes in the time given actually match when omd supposedly
I find the precedent of CFJs two-nine-nine-one and two-two-nine-two
(my number keys are broken) disturbing, and intend, with two support,
to Motion to Reconsider them.
On 19 April 2011 19:00, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I find the precedent of CFJs two-nine-nine-one and two-two-nine-two
(my number keys are broken) disturbing, and intend, with two support,
to Motion
1 - 100 of 729 matches
Mail list logo
