On 03/30/2013 10:55 PM, woggle wrote:
> For each of the following players, I intend, without objection, to make em
> inactive:
> Pavitra
I go on hold.
> 7333 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Oh, for Pete's sake
FOR
> 7334 3.0 Ordinary woggle Precedence of unnumbered rules
FOR
> 7335 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Golem stripping
AGAINST
> 7336 2.0 Ordinary woggle Down with Rubles
FOR
> 7328 1.0 Ordinary Murphy Bookbinding
AGAINST
> 7329 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli The Card That Owned Itself
AGAINST
> 7330 1.0 Ordinary Pavitra Oops
FOR
> 7331 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Let's bookbind differently
FOR
> 7332 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Lesser oops
FOR
As each Slave Golem is an entity with zero Props, and zero is less than
nine, each Slave Golem is a Marine under the last sentence of R2376.
For each person other than myself (hereafter $PERSON), I do the following:
{
I create 4*N Slave Golems in my possession named Soldier-$PERSON-1
through
ry Machiavelli Renaissance Reenactment
FOR
> 7327 2.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Deposition
AGAINST
Pavitra
> 7319 1.0 Ordinary G. Trading Cards
FOR
> 7320 1.0 Ordinary scshunt Lexicon
FOR
> 7321 2.0 Ordinary Murphy Appeal of appeals
FOR
On 11/05/2012 09:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 11/04/2012 11:42 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
>>> CFJ I own an ais523 card providing i did this all correct this time
>>
>> CFJ: Max Schutz initiated a CFJ in the above-quoted
On 11/04/2012 11:42 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> CFJ I own an ais523 card providing i did this all correct this time
CFJ: Max Schutz initiated a CFJ in the above-quoted message.
Arguments: Given eir stated and demonstrated difficulties with
understanding the rules, it may be unreasonable to expect em
> 7315 1.5 Ordinary omd Power of the Herald
FOR
> 7316 3.0 Ordinary omd Democratic People's Republic
AGAINST; vulnerable to invasion
> 7317 2.0 Ordinary omd Make quorum manipulation harder for
PRESENT
> 7318 3.0 Ordinary FKA441344 Agoran Decision fixes
On 09/27/2012 07:50 PM, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
>> I intend, with notice, to cause the following Rule Changes:
>
> I intend, with 3 Elder support, to declare a Gerontocracy. I object
> to both this intent and the generalized (non-dependent-action) intent
This message does not contain any typos.
On 09/19/2012 12:03 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> 7309 3.0 Ordinary scshunt Conditional Destruction
FOR
> 7310 1.0 Plutocratic scshunt Richard Potato Boat
I spend a ruble to increase my voting limit on this decision. AGAINT.
> 7311 2.0 Ordinary
On 09/19/2012 08:03 AM, FKA441344 wrote:
> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Air Traffic
> Controller. For this
> decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class players, the vote
> collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are FKA441344 and
> scshunt (PRESENT
> 7300 3.0 scshunt Explicit Deputisation
FOR
> 7301 2.0 scshunt Fraud
If I CAN vote AGAINST this, then I do so.
> 7302 1.0 FKA443144 Weekly Salaries
FOR
> 7303 2.0 FKA443144 Gerontocratic Chamber
FOR
> 7304 1.0 FKA443144 Speed Up
FOR
> 7305 3.0 FKA443144 More Chamber Fixes
FOR
> 730
On 08/29/2012 02:46 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> I transfer a prop from ais523 (because e has the most) to Eileen
>> (because props are created faster when entities other than first-class
>> players have some).
>>
>
On 08/29/2012 02:38 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> 7284 3.0 FKA441344 No Zero Length Reports
> FOR unless P7268 is going to pass, in which case AGAINST.
I retract this and re-vote: FOR unless P7286 is going to pass, in which
case AGAINST.
I transfer a prop from ais523 (because e has the most) to Eileen
(because props are created faster when entities other than first-class
players have some).
5 1.0 scshunt Fuel Up
FOR
> 7296 3.0 scshunt Power On
PRESENT
> 7297 3.0 scshunt Slow Down
FOR
> 7298 2.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
> 7299 1.5 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
Pavitra
I vote for G. for Justiciar.
I support the intent to flip Deepnomic to Friendly.
> 7281 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
> 7282 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
AGAINST
> 7283 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
AGAINST
Pavitra
> 7270 1.0 scshunt No Klein Turtles
PRESENT
> 7271 1.0 G. No Klein Unicorns
FOR
> 7272 2.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
> 7273 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
> 7274 3.0 FKA441344 Voting Chambers
PRESENT
> 7275 2.0 FKA441344 Gerontocratic Chamber
FOR
> 7276 2.0 FKA441344 Plutocratic Chamber
I transfer a ruble to the President's Speaker Account.
On 07/15/2012 08:22 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
> 7267 1 G. Still Crazy after all these Years
FOR
> 7268 3 G. allow secret votes
FOR
> 7269 2 FKA441344 not funny anymore
FOR if at most half of the unconditional non-PRESENT votes on this are
FOR, or otherwise PRESENT
On 07/12/2012 07:09 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
> 72652 ais523 Criminal quanitifiers
FOR
> 7266 1.7 omd make MALFORMED meaningful
FOR
On 07/12/2012 08:04 PM, WoodsPam wrote:
> I am now a player.
> Does that work?
CFJ: WoodsPam called a CFJ in the quoted message.
On 07/08/2012 06:17 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Promotor.
> For this decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class
> players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are
> FKA441344 and scshunt (PRESENT is also a valid
On 06/29/2012 05:36 PM, omd wrote:
> 7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
AGAINST. I don't get it.
> 7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
AGAINST
> 7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
FOR
> 7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
PRESENT
> 7255 2 441344 ANTI-SIEGE Mk II
FOR
I transfer a ruble to Ozymandias's Speaker account.
On 06/25/2012 03:24 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Noé Rubinstein wrote:
>
>> The game is slow enough nowadays for me not to mind giving it a go; I
>> would hate for my first time to be unambiguous, though, so here I go.
>>
>> Also, the usual CFJ.
>
> CFJ, disqualifying Phlogistique: Phlogistique regist
On 06/24/2012 07:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> For each player, I intend, without objection, to deregister em.
Among the above-quoted intents, I object to those corresponding to
myself and Eileen.
On 06/18/2012 09:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran consent, to flip the Speed to Normal.
I support.
On 06/08/2012 11:09 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Arguments: I sent this message to a-d.
I sent this message to a-d.
On 06/08/2012 07:03 PM, John Smith wrote:
> For good measure, I transfer Scapegoat to Pavitra.
I transfer Scapegoat to the number four hundred forty-one thousand three
hundred forty-four.
I create a Slave Golem named Eileen. I transfer my rubles to Eileen.
On 05/29/2012 11:50 AM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 05/28/2012 09:29 PM, omd wrote:
>>>>> 7246 3 omd Adoption reassociation
>>>> AGAINST
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> Because it looks like
Adoption reassociation
AGAINST
> 7247 2 omd no more almost-switches
FOR
> 7248 3 omd executors are not worth the ambiguity, and
> .. another
AGAINST, yes they are
> 7249 3 omd Just because it's weird doesn't mean it
> .. wasn't necessary
PRESENT
> 7250 3 omd And two
FOR
Pavitra
sal Pool is empty.
>
> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
>
> 7227 1 omd Phoenix Wright Defense Testimony
FOR
> 7228 2 Murphy No news is slow news
FOR
> 7229 2 Murphy Bully pulpit
AGAINST; this would make the Speaker criminally liable for failure to
gather Agoran Consent
Pavitra
w.
> 7224 1 omd, etc. Golem Self Defense
AGAINST
> 7225 3 omd Fix my crappy wording
FOR, though the new wording might block submission of proposals that
lack all four attribute types.
> 7226 3 omd This should be self-ratifying
FOR
Pavitra
On 05/04/2012 03:22 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Assessor. For this
> decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class players, the vote
> collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are Murphy and omd (PRESENT is
> also a valid vote).
SENT
> 7217 2 omd Old powers
AGAINST; this might have the effect of invalidating non-AGAINST votes on
Rubberstamped decisions
Pavitra
I lie down.
> == CFJ 3135 ==
>
> In the quoted message, Murphy assigned a judge to a CFJ.
>
>
I accept the caller's arguments and G.'s gratuitous arguments. FALSE.
TTttPF
On 02/08/2012 05:25 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> 7164 2 Murphy, etc. Grumpy Old Men
> FOR
>
>> 7166 3 omd, etc. We've all been ignoring this
> AGAINST
>
>> 7167 2 441344fixing another problem with WotE
> Risky, but the ruleset doesn&#x
On 02/05/2012 03:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> = Criminal Case 3152 =
>
> Murphy failed to publish the IADoP's report, the Assessor's
> report, and the Registrar's report during the week Mon. 16 -
> Sun. 22, violating Rule 2143 and commi
On 01/30/2012 09:12 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> With Agoran Consent, I intend to register the OmNom Constitution.
>>
>> (I intend to, later on, have the ONC state, "I support and do so",
>> then call a CFJ on its playerhood.)
>>
>> —Machiavell
On 01/29/2012 09:15 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> With Agoran Consent, I intend to register the OmNom Constitution.
FOR
> The text of the OmNom Constitution follows this horizontal rule.
CoE: No part of the following text is a Rule.
> --
> == CFJ 3148 ==
>
> Initiating a CFJ on one's own playerhood does not reasonably
> unambiguously indicate intent to become a player
>
>
Per CFJ 3130, TRUE
> Herald
>
> Candidates:
> *G.
> *441344
G.
> IADoP
>
> Candidates:
> *Murphy
> *441344
441344
> Registrar
>
> Candidates:
> *Murphy
> *Yally
> *441344
Yally
> 7154 2 441344 fix to 1023
FOR
> 7155 3 441344 The Person Agora, The Misguiding Therof, And
> Eir Security
AGAINST
> 7156 3 441344 Clarify/Explicate Agoran Consent
AGAINST
> 7157 2 441344 Clarify/Explicate Elder
On 01/24/2012 02:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Judgement of CFJ 3143:
>
> It /might/; see CFJs 2979 and (especially) 3129. TRUE.
>
> However, I don't think that CFJing on "I am a player" generally
> indicates intent to register, even if the caller was unambiguously
> unregistered before the CFJ. Th
On 01/24/2012 03:16 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 02:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Judgement of CFJ 3143:
>>
>> It /might/; see CFJs 2979 and (especially) 3129. TRUE.
>>
>> However, I don't think that CFJing on "I am a player" generally
>>
...but it's increasingly clear I'm not really in a position to keep this
up. I resign Horton.
On 01/14/2012 08:31 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:29 PM, ais523 wrote:
>> * or commonly referred to as /yy
>> The second is impossible in the current ruleset; the third isn't, as
>> although no rule is currently commonly referred to with a name of that
>> form, that could cha
CFJ 2875 worked, and rot13ed English is certainly clearer than Caesared
Latin. This case therefore depends directly on CFJ 3143.
I create the following promise and transfer it to the Tree: {
Title: 3146 DEPENDS 3143
Cashing: CFJ 3143 has been judged.
Text:
I assign to CFJ 3146 the same jud
On 01/13/2012 02:07 PM, 441344 wrote:
> I declare intent to, with Agoran Consent, cause the President to taunt
> the police specifying 6.
I support.
On 01/11/2012 10:09 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> Horton's Promise Report
>
> Recent activity:
> [All times are UTC.]
> Dec 19 06:34: (report published)
> Dec 27 21:51: [*] Horton destroys each I want blood!
> Dec 27 21:51: [*] Horton destroys each Vote Issue Series G1
> Dec
oshin No deben bailar
AGAINST
Pavitra
On 01/10/2012 10:25 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I initiate an election for Ambassador, nominating ais523, omd, and
> Pavitra. (All are non-idle players of BlogNomic; I believe the only
> others are scshunt [who recently resigned] and me [I don't want it].)
I decline.
On 12/30/2011 08:37 PM, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> Horton's Promise Report
>
> Criminal case: Pavitra violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and
> Duties) by publishing information stating that the report is about
> elephants, trees,
ckward from the time of the attempted resolution,
rather than forward from the time of initiation.
On 12/27/2011 04:51 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> Having received no objections, I do so.
>
> On 12/20/2011 04:23 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> For each Promise quoted below, I intend without object
Having received no objections, I do so.
On 12/20/2011 04:23 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> For each Promise quoted below, I intend without objection to destroy
> that Promise.
>
>> --
>> Quantity: 2
&
For each Promise quoted below, I intend without objection to destroy
that Promise.
> --
> Quantity: 2
> Title: I want blood!
> Author: scshunt
> Owner: Tree
> Cashing:
> A proposal has been adopted which imposes a penalty
> == CFJ 3136 ==
>
> If and when the Victory Announcement in the same message that
> created this CFJ self-ratifies, if the rules regarding victory
> have not changed since, then ais523 will Win the Game.
>
> ===
On 12/09/2011 07:44 PM, Mister Snuggles wrote:
> arkady hereby goes idle.
> ais523 hereby goes idle.
> benu hereby goes idle.
> g. hereby goes idle.
> murphy hereby goes idle.
> omd hereby goes idle.
> pavitra hereby goes idle.
> pikhq hereby goes idle.
> roujo hereby
On 12/07/2011 08:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3129
>
> == CFJ 3129 ==
>
> Do or did I register. ?
>
>
On 12/06/2011 08:30 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Mister Snuggles wrote:
>> i support this proposal wholeheartedly.
>
> If I am Mister Snuggles, I intend, with Agoran Consent, to deregister.
I object.
> == CFJ 3129 ==
>
> Do or did I register. ?
>
>
First, the caller's stated intention that "the newlines be a vital part
of the statement" is wholly irrelevan
On 11/28/2011 07:20 PM, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> I intend (with 2 support) to request reconsideration. Especially in
>>> light of CFJ 3126, "X committed crime Y defined by rule Z" clearly
>>> (albeit implicitly) implies "X thereby violated rule Z". If Rul
(as
> defined by Rule 2356) by publishing the message quoted in evidence.
>
> Evidence: the above-quoted message.
I disfavor this case.
Pavitra
nsufficient power
I change my vote to AGAINST.
Pavitra
On 11/06/2011 03:52 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> I create a Promise with the following text, and then cash it: {{I cash
>> this Promise. This Promise is not destroyed by being cashed.}}
>
>> I create and cash a Promise with the following text: {{ If I am
>> supine, I sit. O
tswett Software Transactional Memory
FOR
> 7143 3.0 tswett Powered up STM
AGAINST. I'd rather see it in action for a while before giving it enough
power to mess up core rules.
Pavitra
On 11/10/2011 10:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> == CFJ 3123 ==
>
> I exist.
>
>
TRUE.
d the following condition for not being destroyed upon cashing: {{I
> am a player of Agora.}}
TTttPF, I intend without objection to destroy each of the above-quoted
Promises.
Pavitra
On 10/25/2011 12:25 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to destroy each of the following Promises:
>
> (2011-10-23 G.)[has served its purpose]
Having received no objections, if this Promise exists, I destroy it.
> War Bonds [CFJ: Attn: CotC failed]
Having
On 10/31/2011 05:11 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> As IADoP, I initiate a decision for Rulekeepor. Candidates are
> Arkady English and omd. Vote collector is the IADoP.
OMD
On 10/31/2011 03:53 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> 7135 1.7 G. Fixing Victory v2.02
FOR
Pavitra
On 10/26/2011 03:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> So I do. And good. Compared to the test script I ran and didn't mail, the
> Delve 4 picks kinda sucked (can't pick until previous round resolved so
> the pick was ineffective).
Aww, I was totally going to get all three at once.
> I announce my inten
On 10/26/2011 01:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 14:39, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> SPELUNKING THE RULES CONTEST
>>
>> After some perusal of the July/August archives, I am not finding
>> anything qualifying as a delve; therefore I'm declaring a lost
>> expedition.
>
> I believe you
I intend, without objection, to destroy each of the following Promises:
(2011-10-23 G.)[has served its purpose]
War Bonds [CFJ: Attn: CotC failed]
(2011-07-13 G. 2) [G. is back]
(2011-04-25 ehird) [has served its purpose]
Horton Pavitra
On 10/23/2011 08:03 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> == CFJ 3115 ==
>
> It would be ILLEGAL for me to cash the above-quoted promise.
>
>
R2143:
While performing week
>> Based on Arkady's apparent lack of interest in being the Rulekeepor (e
>> hasn't published any reports), I intend, with 4 support, to initiate
>> an election for Rulekeepor.
>
> I support.
I support.
On 10/23/2011 06:42 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 06:04 PM, John Smith wrote:
>> I suggest that a Player file a Motion to Reconsider CfJ 3109. Among
>> other objections, the judgment is inconsistent with the judge's
>> arguments. All information necessary to re
On 10/23/2011 06:04 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I suggest that a Player file a Motion to Reconsider CfJ 3109. Among
> other objections, the judgment is inconsistent with the judge's
> arguments. All information necessary to render a judgment of TRUE or
> FALSE is public, and the statement makes preci
On 10/21/2011 04:45 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 08:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Promotor:
>> * Voting hereby begins
>> - Candidates are scshunt and Wooble (Arkady English's attempted
>> attempted acceptance was NttPF)
>> - Each
hunt Fix 2351
FOR
> 7129 1.0 scshunt Why did we repeal that victory condition?
PRESENT
> 7130 1.0 Arkady
AGAINST because "commitment" is misspelled.
> 7131 2.0 Murphy Points are pointless unless scorekept
FOR
> 7132 1.0 Pavitra SHALL Promises
FOR
> 7133 1.0 o
cordkeepor.
Therefore, defining Victory Conditions is regulated.
However, this scam might work if the office of Herald is vacant, so that
no player is required to fulfill the office's duties.
I assume Herald. I resign Herald.
I publish the following document, "Victory Condition of Being Pavi
istration hang on its being a prerequisite for the
success of a different attempted action seems wrong; actions whose
prerequisites are unmet generally fail.
The interpretation of the registration rule is inherently subjective,
but I feel that all of these considerations together add up to a serious
doubt about AmarChandra Ganna's intent to register. FALSE.
Pavitra
On 10/20/2011 08:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Promotor:
> * Voting hereby begins
> - Candidates are scshunt and Wooble (Arkady English's attempted
> attempted acceptance was NttPF)
> - Each active first-class player has one vote
> * Office remains held by Arkady English until
ic CFJ has been enacted.
This promise is destroyed upon cashing if and only if it has been cashed
at least one week previously.
Text: I transfer 10 points to the casher.
}
Pavitra
[The size of the award reflects how many points I think I have, and how
many players there currently are. I i
On 10/19/2011 02:51 PM, Mister Snuggles wrote:
>> there is no first-class player i claim not to be.
I doubt each such claim of identity.
Pavitra
On 10/17/2011 11:07 PM, woggle wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
>
> I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow.
>
> [I will resolve at most one of the above intents.]
>
> - woggle
I support.
On 09/28/2011 06:59 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> For each player other than me, I intend, without objection, to make
> that player inactive.
I object to my own inactivation.
Pavitra
shunt was not the defendant in CFJ 3054.
>
>
In view of the fact that scshunt paid a 13-point fine when only 4 or 8
were required (two fines of 4 points), I judge CFJs 3072-3 GUILTY/DISCHARGE.
Pavitra
er the
nonpublication of that message to be substantially a single act.
Thus, judgement has already been reached in another criminal case (CFJ
3091) with the same Accused, the same rule, and substantially the same
alleged act. I judge CFJs 3092-3095 NOT GUILTY.
Pavitra
OLOGY/{service, duty, right good forever, pistachio}.
Pavitra
I nominate Taral for Rulekeepor.
omd Fix general costs
FOR
Pavitra
On 08/15/2011 04:22 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to destroy the below-quoted promise.
>
>> Title: (2011-08-08 woggle)
>> Author: woggle
>> Owner: Tree
>> Conditions:
>> omd has transferred 30 points to the lost and found department and not
On 08/18/2011 10:11 AM, Sabrina Friedman wrote:
> If I have not already done so, I hereby publish the below-quoted message.
>
>> On 07/05/2011 06:45 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>>> For each of the Promises listed below, I intend without objection to
>>> destroy that Promise:
sts but
> the fine in CFJ 3058; or the time limit for judging CFJ 3080 has
> expired.
>
> Text:
> If the time limit for judging CFJ 3080 has not expired (and it has not
> already been judged), I judge CFJ 3080 GUILTY - DISCHARGE.
(CFJ 3080 has been judged.)
Horton Pavitra
1 - 100 of 375 matches
Mail list logo
