On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:42 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I take the following actions if and only if they would result in me
>>> having more chits than before:
>>>
>>> {I RBoA-withdraw 8 0 crops. This costs
Without objection, I intend to transfer all the Lost and Found
Department's assets to myself.
--Warrigal of Escher
Did you guys get this? I got neither a "sorry, you're not subscribed"
nor an echo.
If the below message was not sent successfully, I send it now. I'll
see about subscribing that address to the lists.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:42 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take the following acti
I request subsid.
--Warrigal of Escher
I become a party to Peggy Bay.
--Warrigal of Escher, who likes calling the PBA "Peggy Bay"
Don't know how to vote? Don't waste your voice with PRESENT; vote LLAMA!
I vote as follows:
> 5794 O 1 1.0 Murphy Return of the Repeal-o-Matic
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5795 O 1 1.0 Murphy Stop letting the Mad Scientist double-dip
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5796 O 1 1.0 Ivan Hope CXXVIIGen
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, ihope wrote:
>> I CFJ on the following: A moment ago, I satisfied the Winning
>> Condition of Renaissance. Arguments: No rule said I didn't have a full
>> set of ribbo
I have a full set of ribbons. Therefore, I destroy one ribbon of each
color in my possession, satisfying the Winning Condition of
Renaissance.
I CFJ on the following: A moment ago, I satisfied the Winning
Condition of Renaissance. Arguments: No rule said I didn't have a full
set of ribbons, so it
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, it's about Ivan Hope deregistering emself by announcement in
>> #really-a-cow.
>
> Okay, that depends on CFJ 2211.
I was wondering where that CFJ went. I submit the following to it:
Evidence: The following was in the m
I pledge to cause teucer to gain a Note within 30 days of eir
registration if e registers within 30 days.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:16 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object to everything I can object to. I support everything I can support.
I retract all support and objections I can.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I object to everything I can object to. I support everything I can support.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:54 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 22:35 -0400, ihope wrote:
>> A recent quote from ##nomic on freenode:
>>
>> 22:29 < ihope> I agree to the following: {This is a pledge. The Bell
>> of Opening, the
I submit a proposal, adoption index 1 and title "Genocide I": "Remove
all instances of a letter H in all power-1 rules and titles of said
rules."
I strongly recommend all Agorans to avoid all use of H in future
messages except if necessary.
--Ivan ope CXXVII
A recent quote from ##nomic on freenode:
22:29 < ihope> I agree to the following: {This is a pledge. The Bell
of Opening, the Candelabrum of Invocation, the Book of
the Dead, and the Amulet of Yendor are singleton
assets, known as Artifacts. Ownership of Artifa
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I create the following contract:
> {
> 1. This is a public contract called the UNDAD.
> 2. Anyone can join this contract by announcement. Joining this
> contract is known as "degregistration".
> 3. comex CAN act on behalf of any p
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here and Gone Again: a Registrar's Report
>>
>> Date of this Report: Thu 9 Oct 2008
>> Date of last Report: Fri 3
I vote:
> 5779 O 1 1.0 comex Refresh
LLAMA (PRESENT)
> 5780 D 1 2.0 comex Fix Rule 1789
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5781 D 1 2.0 Murphy Expedited appeals
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5782 D 1 2.0 Murphy Fix panels
LLAMA (endorse ais523)
> 5783 D 1 3.0 Murphy F
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:39 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. With the consent of a majority of Llamas, I intend to amend the
> Llama Party by replacing "A valid vote cast by a Llama of LLAMA (X),
> where X resolves to FOR or AGAINST, is a party vote tow
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 5:37 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I refuse to become a party to Nomic 217 under Agoran law until I
> announce otherwise.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
While I'm at it, I refuse to become a party to the PerlNomic
Partnership. I am currently no
I refuse to become a party to Nomic 217 under Agoran law until I
announce otherwise.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
RFC 12: "Every player has a number of AP, which is initially 7 and
never more than 7. Every midnight UTC, every player gets an AP, unless
this would put them above 7 AP. Subgame actions generally require a
certain number of AP to perform."
I take the following action within the Subgame: I cause th
I CFJ on the statement "Nomic 217 is a nomic." Arguments: The only
thing that could make Nomic 217 a nomic is RFC 2, which both its
current players have agreed to, making it effectively a rule. Its text
is as follows:
"When interpreting and applying the rules, the general intent of the
rules takes
I submit the following conditional votes and pledge not to retract them:
> 5746 O 1 1.0 Murphy The Notary web site is there to be used
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5747 O 1 1.0 Bayes Ordinary for a of
> f
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:58 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object. If you want to leave in a huff, do it the proper way (R1789).
>
> Although, I suppose it's presently broken...
>
> Proposal: Fix Rule 1789 (AI=2)
> {
> ehird is a coauthor of this proposal.
>
> Change the power of Rule
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 18:21, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5772 D 1 2.0 Murphy Loose ordering of ID numbers
>> LLAMA (PRESENT)
>
> The above vote is invalid per the Ll
I vote:
> 5765 O 1 1.0 Wooble
LLAMA (AGAINST)
> 5766 O 0 1.0 ais523 root made me do it
LLAMA (AGAINST), for obvious reasons
> 5767 D 1 2.0 Murphy Be careful what you start
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5768 O 1 1.0 Murphy One-way appeals
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5769
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here and Gone Again: a Registrar's Report
>
> Date of this Report: Thu 9 Oct 2008
> Date of last Report: Fri 3 Oct 2008
> Date last ratified : Fri 4 Jul 2008
> Ratified Report: Sun 29 Jun 2008
Without objection, I inten
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
>> CFJ 2151:
A moment ago, I revealed that my age is a composite number by
announcement.
>>
>> TRUE
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. I ask that the
> caller reveal whether
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:54, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Can you re-post the agreement so I can read it
For each of the following votes X, I make the following conditional
vote: LLAMA (X) if I am a party to The Llama Party, X otherwise.
> 5753 D 1 3.1 ais523 This one probably ought to fail...
PRESENT
> 5754 D 1 2.0 comex The Endless Repeals: 1023.a.6-8
FOR
> 5755 D 1 2.0
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:23 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Contract
>> Changes can be performed with the consent of a majority of Llamas;
>> this is the only way a person can join this contract.
>
> Can I join?
Well, nobody I've invited has wanted to join, and you're the only one
who's ex
So, the proposal "A Great Relief" will repeal all rules but five. This
will leave in place Rule 101, "Agoran Rights and Privileges"; Rule
217, "Interpreting the Rules"; Rule 1698, "Agora Is a Nomic"; Rule
104, "First Speaker"; and Rule 2029, "Town Fountain".
Rule 101, "Agoran Rights and Privileges
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:45 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Demoted to Epsilon: Bayes (not first class)
>
> Anyone up for Grand Poobah who won't prefer demoting partnerships?
I terminate the following:
0. Thi
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:16 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following: {This is a pledge. Ivan Hope CXXVII can
> terminate this pledge at any time. The Thing Of Purely Sentimental
> Value is a singleton asset whose recordkeepor is Ivan Hope CXXVII. If
>
I agree to the following: {This is a pledge. Ivan Hope CXXVII can
terminate this pledge at any time. The Thing Of Purely Sentimental
Value is a singleton asset whose recordkeepor is Ivan Hope CXXVII. If
Ivan Hope CXXVII claims to be the Ambassador while not the Ambassador,
any person CAN, as penalt
For every vote of LLAMA (X) I unsuccessfully attempted to make in the
quoted message, I vote X on the decision instead. (Also, I invite
ais523 and Sgeo into the Party as well.)
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:55 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote:
>
>> 5740 O 1 1.0 Pavitr
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:15 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since the action taken by the caller of CFJ 2200 does not require
>> reporting or announcing any kind of information, the action of
>> initiating
I vote:
> 5740 O 1 1.0 Pavitra More Reasonable Monster Deputy v.2
LLAMA (FOR)x1635
> 5741 D 1 3.0 Murphy Namespace conflicts (players)
LLAMA (FOR)x1635
> 5742 O 1 1.0 OscarMeyr Give the Monster a Haircut
LLAMA (endorse BobTHJ)x1635
> 5743 D 0 3.0 Wooble
I agree to the following:
{The name of this contract is "The Llama Party." This is a public
contract. Parties to this contract are known as Llamas. Contract
Changes can be performed with the consent of a majority of Llamas;
this is the only way a person can join this contract. Any Llama can
cause
PF.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:02 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I leave the Church of Agora.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I leave the Church of Agora.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:45 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, titled "A Great Relief", with
> adoption index 3: Repeal all rules except Rules 101, 104, 217, and
> 2029.
I retract that proposal. I submit the following proposal, titl
I submit the following proposal, titled "A Great Relief", with
adoption index 3: Repeal all rules except Rules 101, 104, 217, and
2029.
Note that Rule 101 implies that CFJs still exist, implying that the
CotC, offices, players, public fora, etc. still exist, which sets the
precedent for lots of ot
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:39 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Legal tender assets are defined by the currency's backing document,
>> not by the legal tender assets' backing docume
I vote:
> 5727 D 1 2.0 Ivan Hope CXXVIILegal Tender
FORx1635
> 5728 D 1 2.0 Ivan Hope CXXVIIWhat, still?
FORx1635
> 5729 D 1 3.0 comex switch off the fountain
AGAINSTx1635
> 5730 D 0 2.0 comex Fix the ratification error
SELL (1VP)
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I submit the following proposal, titled "Legal Tender", with an
adoption index of 2:
{Append the following paragraph to rule 2166:
{The face value of a currency in itself is 1. The face value of any
other asset in a currency is whatever the currency's backing document
says it is, or 0 by default.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5710 D 3 3.0 Murphy Pragmatic rights and privileges
> AGAINST
>
> You probably want to insert the words "more than" in R101, (6) after
> "penalized" so that it reads "Not be penalized [more than] once
I submit a proposal, titled "What, still?", with adoption index 2:
{Change Rule 869's power to 2. At the end of the first paragraph, add
the sentence "Changes to citizenship are secured." Remove ", unless
prevented by the rules,". Change Rule 1504's power to 2. Replace "An
exiled entity CANNOT reg
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:07 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote:
>
>> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
> SELL (2VP)
Wait, I'm no longer Indebted, am I? I cease to be a slave, retract all
votes of SELL (2VP) (and cancel their respective tickets), and vote
FORx
Disclaimer: The remainder of this message is not necessarily true.
I CFJ on the following statement: This CFJ will exist one second from now.
Disclaimer: The above disclaimer is not necessarily true. This
disclaimer takes precedence over the above disclaimer.
I argue for FALSE, as it would be us
I CFJ on the following statement: Including "From: root
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" in the email header constitutes a claim to be Ian
Kelly (a.k.a. root).
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2008, at 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This message hereby informs the Agoran community that this email address
>> is one that I will occasionally use to send messages to Agora, and
>> messages
>> from this ad
I vote:
> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
SELL (2VP)
> 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ
FORx1635
> 5710 D 3 3.0 Murphy Pragmatic rights and privileges
SELL (2VP)
> 5711 O 1 1.7 Murphy Community service
SELL (2VP)
> 5712 D 1 3.0 Murphy Relax
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:07 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 13:47 -0400, ihope wrote:
>> With the consent of all its parties, I intend to amend The Normish
>> Partnership by adding the following item to the end of its ordered
>> list: "
With the consent of all its parties, I intend to amend The Normish
Partnership by adding the following item to the end of its ordered
list: "6. Normish Point Vouchers are a currency whose recordkeepor is
The Normish Partnership. Any party to TNP CAN act on its behalf to
publish an NPV report."
And
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:21 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For the purposes of this message, Mr. Elbow is defined as an entity I
>> can act on behalf of by announcement.
>
> Then Mr. E
I agree to the following: {This is a pledge. The Twin Sisters are
non-fungible assets. There are exactly two Twin Sisters. Initially,
both Twin Sisters belong to Ivan Hope CXXVII. Ivan Hope CXXVII can
terminate this pledge by announcement.} If possible, I transfer a Twin
Sister to Wolfram Blitzen.
For the purposes of this message, Mr. Elbow is defined as an entity I
can act on behalf of by announcement. Mr. Elbow explicitly and
willfully agrees to the following: "This is a pledge. Mr. Elbow SHALL
register as soon as possible."
I CFJ on the statements "Mr. Elbow is a person.", "Ivan Hope CXX
With the consent of all parties, I intend to amend The Normish
Partnership 2 by adding the following paragraph to the bottom:
"Any person CAN act on behalf of this contract to transfer all its VP
to Ivan Hope CXXVII; after this has been done, any person CAN act
amend this contract by removing this
I recuse myself from all possible cases and flip my posture to supine.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I CFJ on the following: Normish is a nomic. Arguments: Normish
contains, is, or runs on a Linux server which contains a script
allowing its users to alter the server's contents arbitrarily.
Treating this as a nomic ruleset, this makes Normish a nomic.
I also CFJ on the following: If two persons ag
Five seconds ago, I retroactively make this a power-4 rule with title
"The Dictator" and ID number 16290: "Ivan Hope can retroactively
create rules by announcement."
It just doesn't work. The presence or absence of a Temporal Prime
Directive has no bearing on any of this.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I go on hold. Please don't try to assign a sentence to CFJ 2107, as
that is not possible and will only cause confusion.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OscarMeyr wrote:
>
>> With the consent of my fellow panelists Murphy and root, I intend to
>> cause the appeal panel to judge SUSTAIN in CFJ 2107b.
>
> I believe SUSTAIN is R754(1)-synonymous with AFFIRM.
>
> I support.
I tran
I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the first game shall be
Michael Norrish. I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the current
game of Agora shall be Michael Norrish.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:26 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Because the Speaker isn't elected and can't be kicked out? -Goethe
>
> Nonsense. It can be done with an AI=1 proposal to award someone a
> win. Award it to
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:22 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd be willing to support REASSIGN
I agree to all contracts I am currently a party to.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
> "judicial finding" is not defined by the rules. However,
> the best interests of the game and common sense dictate that such a
> finding should not include a judge's statement that e "finds" X in the
> reasoning behind a judgment completely unrelated to X, but rather an
> appealable direct judgm
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2107
>
> = Criminal Case 2107 =
>
>Ivan Hope violated R2149 by making the untruthful statement
>"UNDECIDABLE is
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Two contracts CAN have the same name.
And the arguments:
> I believe the answer to this question hinges on the meaning of
> "Rule-defined" in Rule 1586. Individual contracts seem to be defined
> not by the rules but by the
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I CFJ on the following: I owe 31 VP to the Cabal.
I withdraw this CFJ.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I CFJ on the following: I owe 31 VP to the Cabal.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I vote:
> 5686 D 0 2.0 Goethe Contract Security
SELL (1VP) * 1626
> 5687 O 1 1.0 Goethe MwoP Instances
SELL (1VP) * 1626
I highly recommend that nobody fill any of these tickets except the
first of each.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the RBoA has at least one WRV, I withdraw one.
> If the RBoA has at least one WRV, I withdraw one.
I transfer one prop from root to BobTHJ for not stating the number of
chits this cost.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I call a CFJ on the following statement: {People will thank me for
> this first CFJ.}
> I call a CFJ on the following statement: {People will thank me for
> this second CFJ.}
> I call a CFJ on the following statement: {Peopl
On IRC, this happened:
I found this nomic called "Agoroo A": {Any player can
change the rules with the consent of all other players. If the rules
of Agoroo A change, the rules of Agoroo B change to match, and vice
versa.}
I found this nomic called "Agoroo B": {Any player can
change the rules wit
I vote:
> 5682 D 0 2.0 ais523 Eligible Monsters
FORx1622
> 5683 D 1 2.0 Wooble Fix Elections
FORx1622
> 5684 D 0 2.0 Wooble Correct Ribbons
FORx1622
> 5685 O 0 1.7 ais523 Active Monsters
FORx1622
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2108
>
> == Equity Case 2108 ==
>
>Ivan Hope has failed to increase eir VP holdings above 50 within
>the allott
I don't remember anything disagreeable about any proposals, so here goes.
> 5674 O 0 1.0 ais523 Monstrous Deputies
FORx1621
> 5675 O 1 1.7 Goethe Simple Equity Imposition
FORx1621
> 5676 D 1 3.0 tusho Repeal Rule 101!
FORx1621
> 5677 O 0 1.5 Ivan Hope CXX
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:00 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without objection, I intend to amend the Note Exchange contract by
> replacing "Ivan Hope CXXVII is the recordkeepor of Credits and
> Markers, and generally cannot create them by announcement." with "
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:37 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> So, can anyone explain to me what is going on and what I need to do
>>> using two syllable words or less?
>>
>> The rule says you SHALL (list of actions), bu
Without objection, I intend to amend the Note Exchange contract by
replacing "Ivan Hope CXXVII is the recordkeepor of Credits and
Markers, and generally cannot create them by announcement." with "The
recordkeepor of Credits and Markers generally cannot create them by
announcement."
--Ivan Hope CXX
I nominate myself for Grand Poobah. I agree to the following:
0. This is a pledge and public contract.
1. If I become Grand Poobah before the end of September 2008, then I
pledge to determine demotions and promotions by a random means that
gives probabilities for promotions and demotions among the
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:48 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> I vote as follows
>> 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test
> FORx1 (it's Democratic).
> --
> ais523
>
Me too.
--Ivan
I submit the following proposal, with adoption index 3:
{In Rule 2170, "Who Am I?", insert the following paragraphs before the
last paragraph:
"A person can act on behalf of another person (the Absentee) to send a
message if and only if the Absentee consents to this. The Absentee
agreeing to a co
I submit the following proposal, with interest index 0:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 5:46 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adoption index 1.5, interest index 0 (or 1 or something):
>
> In rule 2198, remove the phrase "if, before the dependent action is
> resolved, no par
I register. I recuse myself from all judicial cases, especially that
one I was supposed to judge years ago. I become sitting.
Now to propose those things that I suggested and nobody else actually proposed.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Hope
> SELL - 1VP - making the specified votes on the specified proposals
I retract this ticket.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
I transfer 80 VP to The Normish Partnership 2. I decree that 50 of its
VP are really mine. Disclaimer: They aren't.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:32 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend to amend TNP2 to read as follows:
>
> And somehow .gnupg got deleted... wow... third key?
>
> I intend to amend TNP2 to read as follows:
> mQGiBEih4EgRBA
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:45 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:32 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend to amend TNP2 to read as follows:
>> (Now we have a domain, normish.org, so new email address and public
>
> I consen
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:32 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to amend TNP2 to read as follows:
> (Now we have a domain, normish.org, so new email address and public
I consent.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:50 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:48 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> With the consent of all parties, I intend to terminate this contract.
>>
>> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
> I consent.
I terminate the contract.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:55 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following:
>
> {
> 1. This is a public contract known as "The Normish Partnership 2".
I agree.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:52 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:43 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I agree to the following:
>>
>> {This is a public contract known as "The Normish Partnership". Any
>> enti
I agree to the following:
{This is a public contract known as "The Normish Partnership". Any
entity CAN cause TNP to act by causing Normish (a.k.a. rootnomic,
which, as of August 9, 2008, was a server located at 209.20.80.194 and
will, prima facie, continue to be that server) to send an email
mess
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/4 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Please read newly-adopted proposal 5640. -Goethe
>
> Whoops.
>
> I initiate an equity case regarding the pledge regarding Nethack
> mentioned
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/3 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> My arguments: UNIMPUGNED is appropriate. Merely not ascending is
>> permissible, as long as I do ascend in a reasonable amount of time.
>>
>
1 - 100 of 373 matches
Mail list logo
