3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no party's
constitution currently does so.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no party's
constitution currently does so.
I intend to appeal this
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This may be, though, when second-class players had a Right to Participate
in the Fora, so some mechanism had to be inferred for doing so.
As I described in the caller's arguments for that CFJ, they still do:
the duplicate
On 3 July 2013 19:21, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:50 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
On 3 July 2013 19:21, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its
