On 6/28/09, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do partnerships require active players?
I submit the following proposal, Support Diplomacy, AI=2, II=0:
{
Amend Rule 2145 (Partnerships) by replacing active first-class players
with first-class persons.
}
I
I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
the server seems to be gone.
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
the server seems to be gone.
I object. The PNP sent a public message less than 32 hours ago, and the
contract provides for a new server to be set up in the event of primary
server failure. I would
On 6/28/09, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
the server seems to be gone.
I object. The PNP sent a public message less than 32 hours ago, and the
contract provides for a new
Sean Hunt wrote:
On 6/28/09, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
the server seems to be gone.
I object. The PNP sent a public message less than 32 hours ago, and the
contract
