> On Dec 4, 2023, at 2:15 AM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-official
> wrote:
>
> PLAYERS INTERESTED IN JUDGING (does not self-ratify)
>
>
>Player Since
>
On 7/3/22 13:25, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> INTERESTED JUDGES AND THEIR MOST RECENT CASES
> ---
> Regular Judges:
> 3970 Jason
> 3971 Secretsnail9
> 3973 Murphy
> 3975 ais523
Sorry, 4st is interested and should be listed here. This will be
reflected in the
On 5/14/22 16:32, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
Overflow Judges:
[None currently]
I'd like to be an overflow judge please.
--
nix
Herald, Collector
On 9/6/2021 4:07 AM, Telna via agora-official wrote:
> INTERESTED JUDGES AND EIR MOST RECENT CASE
> ---
> Regular Judges:
> 3918 Gaelan
> 3921 Jason
> 3922 R. Lee
> 3922 Murphy
> 3925 ais523
H. Arbitor Telna, pls add me back to the judging list. thx! -G.
On 8/1/2021 10:33 PM, Telna via agora-official wrote:
> INTERESTED JUDGES AND EIR MOST RECENT CASE
> ---
> Regular Judges:
> 3911 Murphy
> 3915 ATMunn
> 3916 ais523
> 3917 G.
> 3918 Gaelan
> 3920 R. Lee
> 3921 Jason
H. Arbitor, I'm not interested in judging for the time
On 2021-06-22 10:55, Telna via agora-official wrote:
I deputise for Arbitor (the office is vacant) to publish the following
report:
I award myself a Cyan Ribbon.
I become an interested judge.
Gaelan
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 3:01 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> wrote:
>
> Agoran Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
> Sun 26 Jul 2020
>
> DEADLINES (details below)
> ---
> 3866 Assigned to ArisOVERDUE Thu 23
On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 14:29 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
wrote:
> Agoran Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
> Thu 16 Jul 2020 UTC
COE: This omits the case I called about Diplonomic proposals being
misinterpreted as Agoran proposals. (Sorry for forgetting to signal it;
I'm still used
On 6/9/2020 1:33 PM, grok via agora-business wrote:
>
> COE: CFJ 3837 was judged IRRELEVANT by grok
>
No official CoE needed (this doesn't self-ratify), but admitted- the
gazette was automatically generated before the correction to the 3837 case
file was made, the case file is now fixed so it
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, 12:48 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Arbitor's Weekly Report
>
>
> DEADLINES (details below)
> ---
> 3831 Assigned to Publius Due Sun 07 Jun 2020 19:20:12
> 3838 Assigned to Publius
On Wednesday, May 6, 2020 11:44:41 AM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> INTERESTED JUDGES AND THEIR MOST RECENT CASE
> ---
I'm interested in judging.
--
nch
I become an interested judge.
Gaelan
> On Jan 12, 2020, at 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> wrote:
>
> Arbitor's Weekly Report
>
> [I'm sure the error pointed out by Jason Cobb (now corrected) was not
> the only thing I missed in this messy bunch - corrections very welcome].
>
>
> INTERESTED JUDGES w/ LAST CASE ASSIGNMENT
> 3757 Falsifian (not before Aug 12)
Thanks, I'm back on duty now.
--
- Falsifian
On 8/2/2019 5:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Arbitor's Weekly Report
I earn 5 coins for publishing the above-cited weekly report.
I earn 5 coins for judging CFJ 3761.
I claim a 5 coin reward for judging CFJ 3744 and also a 5 coin reward for
judging CFJ 3745
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 3:54 PM Rebecca wrote:
> I judge CFJs 3744 and CFJ 3745 FALSE for the reasons below.
>
> Proposals (including this one), are usually styled as follows
> "Title:
> Coauthors
> AI
>
I judge CFJs 3744 and CFJ 3745 FALSE for the reasons below.
Proposals (including this one), are usually styled as follows
"Title:
Coauthors
AI
Text"
In this case, the proposals specified an invalid AI. This shorthand has
long been in use, but in my opinion, this case turns on what that shorthand
This finger pointing is valid, I impose a fine on omd for failing to judge
CFJ 3752 in the allotted time. The crime is tardiness which has a 2-blot
base value, but given that the finger was pointed just a day after the time
expired and I see no pattern of violations, I impose a fine of 1 blot.
On
I point my finger at omd for failure to assign a judgement to CFJ 3752
in a timely fashion.
Due 10 July 00:54:31 UTC, time as of writing is 11 July 12:26:xx UTC.
Jason Cobb
On 7/7/19 8:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
3752 Assigned to omd Due Wed 10 Jul 2019 00:54:31
I assign CFJ 3744 to R. Lee.
I assign CFJ 3745 to R. Lee.
On 7/10/2019 5:03 AM, Rebecca wrote:
> I haven't gotten a cfj in a while. maybe it's because my judgements are
> never clear xD
You had a little self-interest on the last couple cases that were called,
but otw you were on top of the
I rescue from these two CFJs. Although I believe my reasoning was correct, I do
not feel strongly about it and the cfjs have engendered enough controversy that
I think it worthwhile for another judge to weigh in.
> On Jul 7, 2019, at 9:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> 3745 Motion for D. Margaux
On 7/7/2019 6:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
oh oops yes - I earn 5 coins for the above report. -G.
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 15:11, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 7/2/2019 6:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > [Quick! While it's still current!]
> >
> > Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
>
> By this announcement, 5 coins are earned by G. for publishing the above
> Arbitor's weekly report.
I don't
On 7/2/2019 6:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
[Quick! While it's still current!]
Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
By this announcement, 5 coins are earned by G. for publishing the above
Arbitor's weekly report.
On 6/30/2019 1:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Court Gazette (Arbitor's Weekly Report)
I earn 5 coins publishing the above report.
I earn 5 coins for the judgement of CFJ 3741.
-G.
On 6/18/2019 12:57 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
COURT GAZETTE (Arbitor's weekly report)
For this report, I earn 5 coins. -G.
I express interest in judging CFJs.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 6:26 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> COURT GAZETTE (Arbitor's weekly report)
>
> Disclaimer: Informational only. No actions are contained in this report.
> Information in this report is not
This is why the Caller should always provide arguments, because otherwise
the judge doesn't know the point of contention (e.g. if it was a question
about specific ballots, and not the proposal-language, the arguments should
reflect that).
I self-file a motion to reconsider this judgement.
On
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> 3691 called by Jacob Arduino 2 December 2018, assigned to G. 2
> December 2018: "'the last person to vote FOR a proposal' is the last
> person to submit a ballot regarding that proposal which evaluates to
> FOR."
I judge CFJ 3691 as follows:
The rules
I accept this CoE and will send a revised Gazette shortly. Thanks for
catching it!
Notice of Honour:
+1 twg (spotting errors in Arbitor’s weekly)
-1 D. Margaux (being careless with CFJ numbers)
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:11 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> On Friday, November 16, 2018 2:03 PM, D.
On Friday, November 16, 2018 2:03 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> 3682 (formerly CFJ 3678), called by twg 31 October 2018, judged FALSE
> by Murphy 4 November 2018: "Gaelan transferred a coin to me today."
CoE: It's the _actual_ CFJ 3678, "By sending a message at 3:35 PM Pacific on
October 27, G.
I ask to be placed on the Day Court. Thanks.
> On Sep 9, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
> COURT GAZETTE (Arbitor's weekly report)
>
> Disclaimer: Informational only. No actions are contained in this report.
>Information in this report is not self-ratifying.
>
>
> Open
Put me down to judge. Obviously is a shortage of them (not to mention
players)
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> COURT GAZETTE (Arbitor's weekly report for 7 May 2018)
>
> Disclaimer: Informational only. No actions are contained in this report.
>
> 3630 Assigned to G. (due Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:10:44)
CFJ statement:
> In the below message, Cuddlebeam supported one or more intents.
Evidence ("below message" of CFJ statement including context):
> On 3/2/2018 4:30 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >
> > I do as stated in this video
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
> COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 28 Jan 2018]
> 3614* Assigned to o (due Fri, 15 Dec 2017 ~23:51:00)
If I am assigned to this case (unclear to me):
I judge
CoE: CFJ 3607 was never properly called, as VJ Rada did not own a shiny at the
time.
On 11/26/2017 6:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 26 Nov 2017]
Open Cases (CFJs)
I recuse myself from 3591. I have tried to come up with a way to read
the rules consistently. However, I have been unable to find a way to
read it that follows all of the rules. I am very sorry for any trouble
that I have caused or will cause.
On 11/19/2017 03:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
Yeah that's a good explanation that makes sense. I retract my intent (is
this possible again?)
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Madeline wrote:
> Alright, so, the idea of it was that the sentence made two claims. Claim 1
> was (hopefully obviously by now) false. The question
I support, with the following arguments:
One reason the judge gives for judging as e does is that the case has
been rendered moot by a rule change. This is not always a bad choice,
but forgets that it's not moot for the Herald-initiated Agoran decision
that may or may not be ongoing.
On Mon,
I don't understand 3594 either. I intend to call a motion for
reconsideration with two support on the grounds that 1: the judgement
seemed to consider best interests of the game using facts after the calling
of the CFJ, rather than the best interests of the game with each blanket
interpretation of
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 12 Nov 2017]
I claim a 5-shiny reward for this report. -G.
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 22 Oct 2017]
I claim a 5-shiny reward for this report. -G.
I re-publish the below report.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 4 Oct 2017]
>
> [comments welcome!]
>
>
> Open Cases
>
> [* =
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 4 Oct 2017]
>
> I claim a 5-shiny reward for this report. -G.
If the above shiny
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 4 Oct 2017]
I claim a 5-shiny reward for this report. -G.
44 matches
Mail list logo