On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2065a
Appeal 2065a
I intend to announce the following on behalf of the panel with panel
support:
The judge's arguments are
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to announce the following on behalf of the panel with panel
support:
The judge's arguments are reasonable, and the Appellant's arguments
do not convince this panel otherwise. This panel moves to AFFIRM.
I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2065a
Appeal 2065a
I intend to announce the following on behalf
Taral wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're too concerned with the facts of this case.
Patent nonsense. BobTHJ, your arguments lead me to believe that you
have no basis other than personal (or contractual) bias on this issue.
Agreed. BobTHJ
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
I think the appropriate response at this point would be to call a
press conference and announce how I tried to work for a bi-partisan
compromise but the other side was unwilling to
Having received the necessary support, I submit the following on
behalf of the panel for 2065a:
The judge's arguments are reasonable, and the Appellant's arguments
do not convince this panel otherwise. This panel moves to AFFIRM.
-Goethe
